White House vows CIA will not use vaccine programs for covert ops

Promise made following complaint that CIA used such a campaign, conducted by Shakil Afridi, in its hunt for bin Laden.


Reuters May 20, 2014
The lobby of the CIA Headquarters Building in McLean, Virginia, August 14, 2008. PHOTO: REUTERS

WASHINGTON: The White House promised on Monday that the CIA will not use immunisation programs for its operations following a complaint that the spy agency used such a campaign in its hunt for Osama bin Laden.

The deans of 12 public health schools had complained about a reported vaccination program conducted by Dr Shakil Afridi who used a hepatitis immunisation survey in Abbottabad where bin Laden was later killed in a secret US mission.

The CIA orchestrated the survey to try to obtain fluid containing DNA from relatives living near the bin Laden residence, the Washington Post reported. It said the effort failed and the surgeon, Afridi, was sentenced to 23 years in prison.

Caitlin Hayden, spokesperson for the White House National Security Council, said Obama homeland security adviser Lisa Monaco had assured the deans in a letter that CIA policy as of August 2013 makes clear "the CIA will make no operational use of vaccination programs, which includes vaccination workers."

"Similarly, the agency will not seek to obtain or exploit DNA or other genetic material acquired through such programs. This policy applies worldwide, and to US persons and non-US persons alike," she said.

COMMENTS (23)

Aziz | 10 years ago | Reply

The program has stopped now so we should feel very grateful and obliged to the US for yet another "favour" done to us.

This was an illegal and immoral enterprise from the outset and against medical ethics. Why has the American Medical Association not spoken as yet against it?

Joan | 10 years ago | Reply

The good old USA has done a lot more damage to Pakistan and the World than any other country has done.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ