Kashmiris shun polls as Modi fear weighs heavy

India’s sizeable Muslim minority is wary of BJP leader, who they blame for the communal riots in Gujarat.


Reuters April 25, 2014
BJP’s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE

ANANTNAG:


Mohammad Amin Pandith, a smallholder and father-of-three from Indian-controlled Kashmir, was lured from his home at night by a man in army uniform, dragged along a potholed lane and shot in the back of the head.


His execution, one of three deadly attacks on village elders in the last week blamed on militants determined to derail elections, spread fear through the hamlet of Gulzarpora and led locals to boycott India’s general election on Thursday.

It also underlined how hard it will be for India’s next prime minister to reach a lasting political settlement in Jammu and Kashmir, a Muslim-majority region that has been largely pacified by a huge security presence, yet is not at peace.



“People are very afraid,” Pandith’s brother Abdul Rahim told Reuters before the vote. He said Pandith’s ‘crime’ had been to act as village headman for a regional party now in opposition. The 45-year-old did the job, which paid $30 a month, not out of conviction, but to pay for his children’s education.

India’s election, which runs in stages until May 12, may well propel Hindu nationalist leader Narendra Modi to power, a prospect that has Kashmir’s 12.5 million people scrabbling to determine what it would mean for them.

India’s sizeable Muslim minority of 150 million is wary of the 63-year-old, whom many blame for failing to prevent communal riots in 2002 in which more than 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, were killed in Gujarat, where he is still chief minister.

Modi denies the charges, and says they are repeated by allies of the ruling Congress party to tarnish his reputation at a time when opinion polls make his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) favourite to lead the next government. In its election manifesto, the BJP vows to uphold India’s territorial integrity and abrogate a clause in the constitution that grants Jammu and Kashmir a degree of autonomy.

India or independence?

That puts Modi at odds with locals in Gulzarpora and many beyond who have long favoured independence from India. Of more than 30 men gathered at a neighbour’s house to discuss Pandith’s murder, not one expressed allegiance to a mainstream political party.

Asked if they preferred independence to staying with India, given the choice, all raised their hands. By mid-afternoon on Thursday, nobody from the village had voted, election officials said. Youths threw stones at police in a nearby town, in one of several disturbances in Anantnag, a constituency that lies in the broad Kashmir valley.

In the district where three people, including two council heads, were killed on Monday, only one vote was cast. In another sign of a more assertive policy should Modi come to power, during a recent campaign speech in Kashmir’s Hindu-majority district of Udhampur he criticised the ruling Congress party for being soft on Pakistan, which also claims the region.

Udhampur has already voted - elections to the region’s six seats are staggered for security reasons. The BJP candidate there, Jitendra Singh, came to support a colleague in Anantnag. “We do not wish to enter into a dialogue with Pakistan from a position of weakness,” Singh said at the BJP’s heavily-guarded office in Srinagar, the state’s summer capital.

“We cannot allow terrorist attacks and a dialogue to continue at the same time.”

Pakistan is playing a waiting game on Kashmir until India’s new government shows its hand on the issue. Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif promised to revive Kashmir talks and made this a focal point of his own election campaign last year, but the efforts stalled after a spate of violence on the disputed border in August. 

Published in The Express Tribune, April 25th, 2014.

COMMENTS (34)

Roy | 9 years ago | Reply

Ideally seperatists should have told Kasmiri population to go and vote for whosoever they want. If they are not interested in the process, they should have gone for the NOTA(none of the above) option. That statistic would have given a strong message to both side, be it Indians be it seperatists. But sadly that would expose the true refrendum and seems separtist forces do not want it. Kashmiris have been reduced to pawns in the game of thrones. There are guns on both side, and people are being forced to choose one.

Lalit | 9 years ago | Reply

@Aun Zaidi yes India is a secular country...thats why it can't let Kashmir go on the basis of religion.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ