He’s hard to look at, Geert Wilders. A set of mean little eyes makes one think of dead fish. They sit under a mane of Heseltine hair, bleached with peroxide. It’s only when people get beyond the grey eyes and frozen blonde tips that they pay attention to what Wilders has to say. And what he has to say isn’t pretty either.
More importantly, what he has to say doesn’t bode well for a tolerant Netherlands. Wilders, you see, is a card-carrying Nazi, and like all good fascists, his rise to fame was based on bashing a minority (Moslems, who else), and railing against immigrants turning Europe into a Eurabia.
Parallels with fellow fascists abound. Much like the BJP’s win following Modi’s massacre, Wilders’ Freedom Party (the PVV) is succeeding because of its stance on Muslims, not in spite of it. And the usual cliche — that all chest-thumping hypernationalists were once confused little boys — ties it all together. As with the theory that Hitler’s grandfather was probably a Jew, Geert Wilders may be guilty of the same self-loathing: his ancestry is Indonesian, a fact he lies well and often about.
In an enjoyable take on the issue, anthropologist Lizzy Van Leeuwen chalked up Wilders’ politics to the same biases his mixed-race forefathers (Indonesia was once a Dutch colony) faced after moving back to the Netherlands. Summarised Dutch paper NRC, “Van Leeuwen describes how these people were put in the ‘cultural minority box’… (but) always felt very patriotic toward the Netherlands.” She also mentioned how they fell in with the far-right, “supporting the Dutch Nazi party in Indonesia in the 1930s”.
But pop psychology only takes us so far. Whatever his demons, Wilders has gone from being another visa reject to becoming the (literal) golden boy of the Dutch right. His PVV bagged 15 per cent of seats in 2010; today it has as many seats in the House of Representatives, and 10 out of a 75-seat Senate. Items on the PVV to do list are economic (taxing headscarves), international (kicking Turkey out of Nato), irrational (abolishing the Senate), racist (recording the ethnicity of repeat offenders), and plain stupid (repealing anti-smoking laws).
A bill of goods that spree-shooters like Anders Breivik could get behind. Breivik has made no secret of his fondness for Wilders; what’s disturbing is that the latter’s appeal goes beyond White Might mass-murderers. “I think we have really the best chances of becoming the main party in the Netherlands,” says the man once mocked as Blonde Geert. Yet, even across the rest of Europe, outfits like Wilders’ are edging into the mainstream.
As this week’s Economist points out, Europe’s own little Tea Parties are “likely to do better in 2014 than at any time since the Second World War”. They’re a tough crowd; from the UKIP led by weird old Nigel Farage in Britain, to France’s National Front led by Marine Le Pen. And between Farage’s endearing oddness and Le Pen’s laundered past, the far-right is trying to shake itself dry. Even where it isn’t, it’s not doing half badly: Greece’s Golden Dawn, a pack of thugs best known for chasing rival football fans and thrashing Pakistani fishermen, bagged 18 seats in Greek parliament… with a semi-swastika as party symbol.
Yes, though they come in different shapes and sizes, it seems skinheads with flagpins are winning across the continent. But cause for alarm though it is, there’s nothing organic about the rise of the Eurofascists. They are unclean, unstable and, ultimately, unsustainable. Most ‘parties’ are one-man operations where the One Man is often autocratic, incompetent, or both. If infighting won’t implode them, the business of actually running things will. And though we’re in for a tough 2014, long-run rest and recovery will take the bite out of their message, and make them unloved and unwanted again.
None of this holds true for South Asia. India isn’t inching toward a hardliner holding government hostage — it’s heading for a government led by its hardest hardliner. Narendra Modi is thought the future; a solution to feeble Singhs and clueless Rahuls and corrupt Congress. That this is a man bathed in blood has been said enough in these pages. No one’s listening.
And over the border here, our right is also abdicating to the psychos on the fringe. Witness the JI, so lost after losing the late Qazi sahib, co-opt the same killers that murder our soldiers in the north. Or watch sectarian monsters run in elections and take over Twitter to spread rage and hate, mushrooming across the south. If ever there was a silent majority wedged in the middle, some sample of common souls with common morals and common dreams, it’s running scared.
And unlike in Europe, better economics can only fix so much — not that we’ve got that going for us either. Economics would be the baseline; the hard part would mean revising curricula, teaching tolerance, encouraging thought, giving the individual a stake in the state. It would mean good men standing up. Until then, we can thank ourselves that said psychos haven’t been voted in yet. With the love and care the state lavishes on all places other than Lahore and Islamabad, that too will change.
As for elsewhere, it may be best to avert our eyes. Modi’s fans think bloody hands a superpower make; Wilders’ voters think he can safeguard Charlemagne’s Europe from the Moors. They should look back to Walter Benjamin, that poor, tormented German philosopher who said, “One reason why fascism has a chance is that in the name of progress its opponents treat it as a historical norm”. Chances are they won’t. Instead, Wilders’ hair will get blonder and his party will get bigger. Modi will likely win Delhi, and win it well.
And Walter Benjamin? He committed suicide while trying to escape the Nazis, and Germany lost one of its finest thinkers. Things weren’t quite the same again.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 7th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (54)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Let's take a step back - Modi's role in the Gujarat riots has been examined in the courts and he has come out unscathed. In our own country, we had thousands who go about killing tens of thousands of innocent people in the name of religion, none of them have ever faced justice and we want to cast stones at Modi. This kind of myopia is amazing.
@mind control - Excellent reply - Unfortunately, the religious bigots and fascists can't see the fascism and bigotry of their own kind in spite of being shown mirror multiple times.
Please write more articles about the Fascist Modi and don’t mind the upper-class Hindus getting offended and writing excuses on SS Modi’s behalf. They should spend more time working for the betterment of their community rather than write one-liners on Pakistani papers
People objecting to the author of this article base their thesis on the idea that the Indian justice system can be accepted as non-biased and non-corrupt. This is of course not the case. The Indian justice system has made quotas based on 'criminal caste', 'other backward caste' to this day. This is a system that has not really challenged ideas based on caste straightaway and only made excuses (despite what they say, we know these men are corrupt to the core). It doesn't really matter what their opinion on the instigators of babri masjid incident is for example. How can we trust these people? Truth is, Modi is backed by fascists who won't let jodha-Akbar play in cinema halls because it hurts their ego and perceived ideas about 'hindu culture'.
@mind control:
You must control your mind; do not confuse Fascism with Resistance or acts of terrorism or of criminal nature committed by people who happen to be of muslim faith or mostly of Asian and African origin. Gaert wilders and his kind do not differentiate between muslims and non muslims, each of these individuals and groups are concerned primarily with people whom they regard of non indigenous category in their community, most if not all are usualy from their former colonies.
Rex Minor
@Gratgy:
Compare with Jinnah and Modi will look as if he's better than god!
@Saad
I am affected by events happen in my life time. The history written I can take it with pinch of salt.
@mind control: Your history starts from 1999?
@lol: Stop trolling over on Pakistan websites then. You're not welcomed here.
Fascism goes global
A. September, 1999, Buynaksk, Moscow, and Volgodonsk - Russia
B. 24th Dec, 1999, IC 814 Kathmandu, Lahore, Kandhar
C. 9/11/2001, New York, Washigton, Pennsylvania- USA
D. 13th December, 2001, Parliament, New Delhi, India
E. 23rd October, 2002, Moscow Theatre, Russia.
F. 11th March, 2004 Train Bombing Mdrid- Spain
G. 7/7/2005 London Tube, Bus- UK
H. 26th November,2008 Mumbai- India
l. 10th January, 2013, 16th February,2013 Quetta and 3rd March Karachi- Pakistan
J. 29th December,2013 Volgogard, Russia.
Yup, Fascism indeed has gone global.
PS- How many of these can we lay at the door of Geert Wilders?
Fan of your work. Good piece.
Bit of a random Modi swipe, which may or may not have had a few other motives behind it. Be less cynical than that Mr Khan. I personally feel that you are one of the better writers on here, with Saroop Ijaz and Fahd Husain. An excellent article overall.
Let me try once again if my comments reach the ET mod. It was a real delight to read the article, his satirical writing style and his fluent intellect trying to link west with east or the otherway around. The people of wilders and le pen type are extreme nationalists of some sort, they have come and gone; there have been well organised crusades of Paulus and Petros christian majority community Nations against the barbarian mussalman arabs who had intruded into the Andalus peninsula and occupied all medetrenian countries from Valencia to Naples, and other mussalmans from the land of Anatolia defeating the Byzanteens of the orthodoxy going deep to the capital of holy Roman Germanic Empire, occupying today's Budapest for centuries. This is the history of Abendland Europe. Fascism is however not the specialty of East but was born and established in Italy by Mussolini. It is an ideology and a doctrine still patented by his family. Both Hitler and Mussolini are also responsible for entering into a concord with the Vatican and gave birth to secularism, separating the authority of church from the Government. But this is nother subject.
Rex Minor
@Bakhtiyar Ghazi Khan: "Reading the comments mostly from Indians, it proves without a doubt who exactly are Modi’s supporters. Most of then are Hindu fanatics who thirst for the blood of Muslims, especially Pakistani and Indian Muslims. If India elects Modi, they should prepare for international sanctions from the Muslim world and be prepared to live without oil, gas, work, and trade for the foreseeable future."
Facts are not your strongest suit are they? Far from boycotting Modi, Muslim nations are willing partners in Modi led Gujarat's progress. http://muslimmirror.com/eng/five-muslim-nations-including-saudi-pakistan-to-attend-gujarat-summit/ The fact that his state has been riot free for close to 12 years gives lie to your statement that Modi is a Islamophobe. Oh and Muslims in Gujarat voted for Modi led BJP in recent Local elections in Gujarat. So per your definition they too are baying for Muslim blood?
@optimist: Indians do ot dispute factual criticism e.g. when someone talks about poverty in India or even the favorite of Pakistanis - open defecation. But rebutting lies with facts does not amount to 'sensitivity'.
@Desi Samachar: It is true that even Hindus grilled Modi. But after all this intense scrutiny what has emerged with regards to Gujarat riots is - given the scale of the riots, Modi requested police help from neighbouring states like Maharashtra who refused. - He then requested army intervention but because of the Parliament attack in Dec 2001, the army was at the borders and it took a day for it to get to Gujarat. After day 3 peace was restored in Gujarat. - Modi has ruled riot free since then in the past 12 years - No one has been able to come up with a single hate speech from Modi or a single poolicy from Modi that discrimnates against people based on religion or caste.
I do not know who your idea of secular party is but it surely cannot be Congress whose record we all know about - starting from encouraging Bhindrawalle to undermine Akali Dal, Nellie massacre, 1984 riots 1993 Mumbai riots and so on. TOken appeasement of minorities is not secularism. Treating all Indian citizens fairly regardless of their religion is.
@It Is (still) Economy Stupid: Or how Zia turned Pakistan into a minority bashing nation under the euphemism of Blasphemy.Blasphemy has come as a blast for minorities and they are are never sure of their lives or their future.Modi is good for India.
@Truth Told- "False it goes back to Hindu chauvinism and its maltreatment of Muslim minority in British India which caused Muslim insecurity and the popularization of the demand for Pakistan"
After the Muslims, Britishers were ruling us. When did Hindus get a chance to rule and mistreat the Muslim minority? Muslims seem to be insecure by nature, even amongst themselves (case Pakistan)... Why blame others for their insecurities.
@Eman:
Thanks Edward Alleyn! I am so sorry I pointed out a flaw in the Lion's (Asad) poetic gibberish!
There is no such thing as "Christian" Europe! If you had ever been to Europe, you would know. Just like in our land of the pure full of holier-than-thou Muslim sects, Europe is divided amongst Catholics, Protestants, Anglican, Orthodox, Calvinists, Huguenots, Baptists, Methodists....an on and on and on, who hate each other pretty much as much as they hate any "outsiders."
That some idiot stands up and vomits anti immigrant rants does not mean he is defending Charlemagne's Europe against Moslem Moors--he is just a racist, pure and simple. Each country has its own set of rabid haters--do you think Geert Wilders likes black Africans, most of whom are in fact christians?
An idle mind is the devil's workshop and all these wannabe scholars are always plagiarising stale ideas from crap magazines--tomorrow, it could be the mating habits of pygmies because Aasd saw a reference to it in Time magazine! The useless writers at ET are an utter waste of time--birds of a feather, always flock together.
at heart every non muslim hates muslims. People like wilders are vocal about their hatred and hence come under the fascist group. even the so called liberal non muslims do not like it, when they see a bearded muslim guy praying in a public park, but they are diplomatic about it.
As a muslim, I prefer the diplomatic and tolerant non muslims. I am also tolerant of other faiths.
This is excellent journalism. Seems like the Indian trolls have swamped this article. In their hearts, every one knows, that Modi is a necromancer. And will lead India closer to the cliff's edge. However, no one dare write anything less than glorifying about the Great Indian Hope.
Look closer and you will find avatars of European fascists lurking in the land of the pure. The case of Modi is just a red herring injected to obfuscate and deflect attention away from Pakistan's poor record in treatment of its ethnic, religious and sectarian minorities.
You always win me! Keep writing.
Asad Rahim's the only reason I read ET on Tuesdays. @John the Baptist
'Charlemagne's Europe' implies Christian Europe. 'Moors' implies Muslim conquerors. Both are not meant to be read into pedantically. You Googling it is distressing.
PS I love this author's lyricism.
@Desi Samachar: "Every incident of religious intolerance in the sub continent traces back to creation of Pakistan." False it goes back to Hindu chauvinism and its maltreatment of Muslim minority in British India which caused Muslim insecurity and the popularization of the demand for Pakistan. As regards Modi, his name is still not cleared as an appeal is pending in the Indian Supreme Court. There are several versions and accounts of Modi’s involvement in the 2002 Gujrat communal riots. These range from his innocence to his abatement by not calling in the law enforcers and the army soon enough to premeditated conspiracy. If Modi were totally innocent, he would not have become controversial. Besides, Modi has been accused of threatening the witnesses and if so justice has been obstructed. The whole truth will never be known. About Pakistan sponsoring terrorism, let it be known the country is itself the biggest sufferer and is trying its best to overcome it. India, should also worry about its own home-grown terrorism and stop meddling in Pak affairs for the sake of amity and peace in the region.
It is scary how such nutcases get published in ET. ET, wake up. We come here to read some thing better. This was extremely disappointing.
wilders, farage and edl are too late muslims and immigrants in general in europe are in too greater number, the other fact is europe needs immigrants because of low birth rate otherwise its economy would grind to halt. muslims are 25% of population of Rotterdam and amsterdam 30% of brussels and over 25% of bradford and birmingham.
our choice.... our call.......stop poking ur nose in our affairs....worry about the blast that might happen outside ur house..............
In your fervour to impress with lyrical, rambling facts, you got the order of things wrong again!
The Moors invaded Europe in AD 711, a full 31 years before Charlemagne was even born. It is NOT Charlemagne's Europe that Geert Wilders wants to protect from the Moors--wrong metaphor!
And anyways, this is all old news. Perhaps you should have subscribed to the dud magazine called "The Economist" at least a decade ago.
"No one’s listening." Who are you to advise the people of another country to listen to you? You have forgotten the rights "enjoyed" by the minorities in your own country. You have forgotten about the existential threat coming from extremist elements nurtured and encouraged by your own govt earlier. You have no right to criticise a CM and a PM contestant who has been elected three times by the people of his state. The people of India know whom to elect and whom to reject and they don't need your advice, which anyway, no one in India will heed.
Does the Author know that when the riots broke in 2002 (which started when a train wagon of hindu pilgrims was burnt by muslims leading to a backlash) Modi asked for police assistance from the neighboring states ruled by Congress and they all refused. So much for the so called secular congress wanting peace and harmony between communities. Modi asked for army intervention on the 3rd day as the local police could not handle the situation and in some situations was party to the violence. The 2002 riots is one of the first times that police personnel as well as politicians have been given jail sentences for enticing violence in a riot. Does the author remember what Rajiv Gandhi said during the 1984 riots where 3000+ Sikhs were killed after Indira Gandhi was assassinated. He said "when a big tree falls the ground shakes" referring to the murder of Sikhs by Congress workers. No politician or anyone of note has been convicted so far but I don't hear the author or anybody saying that Rajiv Gandhi and his family are covered in blood. Food for thought I think.
No Indian will vote for Modi if they actually believed that Modi "bathed in blood" as the author so eloquently put it. The author makes it sound as if Modi was running with a sword killing Muslims and ordering the hindu mobs/police/politicians etc. to do the same. If that were the case he would have been caught by now. The Indian judicial system, Congress controlled CBI, tons of governmental and Non-governmental organizations have not found any corroborating evidence linking Modi to the killings in the 2002 riots. I would be the first to pull Modi up for incompetence for not controlling the riots properly but don't think any leader could have controlled the spontaneous eruption of the riots.
Also just a fact that the Author should know is in spite of the riots, Gujarat is one of the few states in India where muslims have proportional representation in the police, civil/administrative services, local govt. bodies etc. Whether Modi wins in 2014 or not will not be because he is perceived to be a fascist/hindu nationalist or right wing but because he has shown a model in Gujarat where sustained growth and development has been seen with limited corruption across religious backgrounds. As an economist I would question the high debt of the state of Gujarat if anything but as no other leader has been able to provide even close to the level of governance Modi has they are all quiet about this.
Im going to support Aam Admi Party by the way. But lets have some perspective before passing sweeping statements that have little basis on reality cause all it reflects is igorance.
Hope the moderators let this though.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/655236/this-is-not-my-quaids-pakistan/
pls read this article that appeared in ET today before preaching about the world at large.
@SM - brilliant comment.
Democracy is about choice, good or bad. It is far superior to any other form of Government known to man. Those who can deliver governance and a better tomorrow provide hope. If they do not perform, they are booted out. The people of every country make their choice based on very simple considerations, they do not need lectures from others on what will be best for them. Either we like it or have to lump it, there being no third choice.
This fellow is in dreams all the time. Write op-eds on issues in the country where you are living,atleast it will make few people to think of it. Dont behave as if you are living in some western country and analyzing others. None of your op-ed's won't help to anyone, except you simply tried to show your stupid knowledge where you sit and copy stuff from different articles for 20 days and come-up with some article. Grow-up, no one cares your analysis.
very few knows that creation of Pakistan paves for creation of Israel on religious grounds that paved for global hatred on religious grounds. Any state created on basis of religion is bound to suffer violence & hate. Modi is now generous towards muslims because he knows the secularism is founded in constitution and it can't be taken away. He also knows that killing of Muslims is not a solution for Indian problems especially when India has second largest muslim population. He is a transformed person now. He can't have a rouge image at national level. So he has now adopted a developmental approach that improves conditions of hindus and Muslims alike.
Why Indians are so insensitive about criticism on India? If there is no mention of India and a report is on Pakistan, they start comparing and telling us how big they are, like kids used to do in my school when comparing our houses, presents etc... . Usually great countries don't care about opinions and editorials because they are too busy developing. The comments of Indians give me a very bad image of 'greatest democracy'!!!
Dear Sir, I have gone through the article. The young author's comments about Narendra Modi do not correspond to facts. The utter truth is that Modi has undergone the most intense scrutiny by the Indian criminal justice system and has come out clean. There are currently no cases against him in any Indian court. The young author must be careful about throwing mud against blameless people and do more in depth research before taking a stance on issues. As regards the situation in Europe is concerned Europe presently is undergoing a severe economic downturn and local people are finding it very difficult to get jobs so some feelings against foreign immigrants from distant cultures and countries are inevitable. Can the young author name me one Islamic country (there are sixty of them) where minorities are treated in a civilized fashion? To the best of my knowledge there is not a single one. thank you sir
I rather live under modi's facism than mullah jihadism.
But when has not voting them in ever stopped your establishment? or do you mean to say, taliban//Jihadist were created and trained by elected representatives of Pakistan? though i somewhat agree with your views on Modi and even Geert, the innocence by which you let your own scum off is troubling! Remember causality is base for everything in this world, Hitler was direct causality of German humiliation and terms piled on it, by winners of WW1. You would do well to trace the causality too my brother, even for the rise of right in India, which you have no one else to blame but extremism spread by your kind.
PS: i challenge you and anyone else who would like to take this challenge, trace the causality of current terrorism(in Pakistan/ South Asia, everywhere), and tell me if any of it would have happened if you would not have jumped in Afghanistan with your patron USA? If your precious Jinnah would not have pushed the Agha Khani's red shirts aside ? And yes sadly, if your feudal overlords would not have tricked your muslim sheep into believing "Islam Khatre main hai" ?
Pakistani LIberals are a unique breed, bah..
Muslims are innocent victims thoroughout the history and throughout the world. :-)
Pakistanis see fascists and bigots in every country in the world except their own.
why don't we just focus on our own massacres. There is a news item in the front page 2,700 muslims were killed in just one year in Karachi all by muslims.
Author is biased to the core. He has no qualm of NATO/USA etc attacking Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan Mali, Somalia etc etc. People who died in these wars were mainly Muslims. On the other hand what treatment Muslim are giving to minority in their own country is not an issue for him. He has not written anything on Christians, Ahmadiyas, Shia or Hindu in Pakistan or Muslim killing fellow Muslims. He has not written on treatment of non Muslim countries in Middle East as they are not even allowed to have basic rights to establish a place of worship for a religion of their choice. Author has no time for women (who are 50% population) rights such as a right to drive among other in the middle east Muslim countries. This article is a prime example of Mind is a terrible thing to waste!
@Desi Samachar:
Excellent analysis.
Modi will be great for Pakistan.
He might be mad and authoritarian, but he'll put Pakistan in its place.
Try another Mumbai and its bye bye.
Take a poll on the world stage around what is associated with fascism around the world today - what do you think would be the answer? I don't even need to say anything - the editors of this newspapers will sensor their own thoughts on this one.
Very scary article, man.
That this is a man bathed in blood has been said enough in these pages. No one’s listening.
Comparison with Nawaz Sharif and Zardari make Modi look like angel personified. Lets not even talk about the Pakistani right wing and the DPC. How many Ahmedis and Shias have been slaughtered under their watch. As far as the Pakistani establishment goes, they still have the blood of 3 million Bangladeshis on their hands.
I guess Pakistani op-ed columnists has developed some type of mechanism to ignore the headlines on the news papers they write for. How else one write about fascism, railing against it all the time forgetting that all type of hatred is found first in Pakistan itself than anywhere else. Pakistanis papers are almost red everyday reporting on deaths, targeted killings, bomb blasts and casual barbarism to sort of one where dead are denied graves, inhuman really. And still they find time to rail against everyone else in the world, pointing their fingers at others showing their shortcomings. It is not my case that Pakistanis have no right to point fingers at others, but one can only point fingers at others when there is peace and tranquillity with one and thus they are worried for others. As for Wilders of Netherlands and Modi of India, I think the citizens of those countries have a right to elect anyone they please as it is their right. However, I know of one country the citizens of which files the largest numbers of asylums in Western Europe and North America, and the name of that country starts with a P as in Pakistan. Lets first worry about that, shall we!
Every incident of religious intolerance in the sub continent traces back to creation of Pakistan. Pre-partition RSS and it's likes had no major following or public support. As soon as Muslim League started stoking fear in Muslims against Hindus, RSS started stoking fear in Hindus against Muslims. Post partition Pakistan attacked India thrice. This gave enough fuel for extremists Hindu to fuel more hatred towards Muslims throughout last 6 decades. It is only after 26/11 when Pakistani terrorists massacred innocent civilians in most cowardly and barbaric manner that people started getting more inclined towards Hindu extremist leaders. Modi has been a leader since more than a decade. He was grilled heavily even by Hindus in India for his incapability to prevent Godhra riot. Most of these people became his supporter after 26/11. The day Pakistan gives up it's policy on supporting terrorism and sincerely uproots terrorism out of it's land, Indians in general will fall back to more secular Government. Stop justifying Jihad for every problem which you are incapable of solving amicably. Else you will push the entire sub continent to a chasm of religious extremism.