But take a long view and you will be amazed by Nepal. My Nepali friend, Prashant Jha, author of a path-breaking new book on Nepal that will be out in a few weeks, says that Nepal has gone from war to peace, monarchy to republic, theocratic to secular state, a monolithic hill-centric nationalism to inclusive citizenship, and possibly, from unitary to federal state. In fact, it is mainly the issue of federalism that remains to be resolved. These are processes that countries and societies have taken decades to achieve. Nepal is leap-frogging in no time — and when you see it this way, you stop being contemptuous of an acrimonious polity unable to agree upon a new constitution for five years now.
I realised there is something different about Nepal when I discovered it has possibly the least internet censorship in South Asia (just some people worrying about porn). Unlike the rest of us, Nepal doesn’t seem to have politicians trying to censor social media criticism. Nepal also allows news on private community radio — contrast this with the Indian government’s colonial-minded insecurity about allowing community radio beyond a few NGOs and universities, and not allowing any news on private radio. In many years of having widespread community radio, there has been only one incident of violence caused by radio.
The kind of attitudes that a state and society bring to free speech are important indicators of the state of democracy in general, and the indicators about Nepal are heartening. This is reflected in other areas. The representation of Dalits amongst elected leaders in Nepal has gone from negligible to 49 in the span of a decade. Nepal was the first country in South Asia to decriminalise homosexuality. The Nepali Supreme Court did so in 2007 and even asked the government to legislate in favour of equal rights to sexual minorities. The constituent assembly has been debating the same and even has an openly gay legislator amongst themselves.
The Nepali war years — 1996-2006 — left 16,000 dead, 1,300 disappeared and thousands of people displaced. In a world full of conflict, these numbers appear small. But a world full of conflict also needs to learn from the Nepali example of sorting out the changing nature of its society and politics through constitution-making, slowly but steadily, like cooking good dum biryani!
The Indian Constitution and the formative years of the Indian state were helped by a domineering Nehru, who had little political challenge. In Nepal’s case, the polity is bitterly fractured between a declining feudal order and an assertive subaltern politics. Between this tension are many political processes underway, which will thus take time. As both sides compete for power, the last thing India needs to do is meddle in Kathmandu politics. Alas, New Delhi behaves as though Nepal is its responsibility. Instead of this paternalistic attitude, what India needs to do in ‘tiny’ Nepal is to learn from it. As does everyone else.
None of this is to downplay the great challenges Nepal faces. Splinter factions of the Nepali Maoist party (which went from revolution to election) are taking to violence because they don’t want an election now. They first want a caretaker government. Some argue there was no need for fresh elections to the constituent assembly but the Supreme Court ordered one needlessly. These events in Nepali politics can make you despair; the political process seems to go two steps backward every time it has taken one step forward.
In the worst of times, Nepali politics can make you wonder if the Nepali state even exists. But look closer and be surprised to find a state more progressive than any other in our part of the world.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 15th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (20)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
most of the Indians I met, displease Napalis. they considered them good for nan bais and other low jobs. only British considers Ghorkhas good for their army and now started offering equal salaies to goras. Nepal has open border with India and is totally dependent on them. Infact govt is formed after blessing of Dehli and kings were removed. Infact nepal should build a dam on its rivers and ask India to buy electricity.
The comments of Nepalis here and the fact that one of the commentators is giving tips to his fellow Nepalis on why they should not 'resent' India, should indicate to us all how comprehensively allegiance to a nation state trumps bonds of religion/caste etc. Godspeed to Nepal.
A non resenting Indian.
Thank you for this article! It helps when you read about ones own country through fresh eyes. I agree with most of your ideas, but there are still a lot of problems within the system. Nepal is still bound by stringent caste system, corruption still exists. There is still the question of work ethic in Nepal. Socially progressive we may be, but as one of the readers pointed out so well, we are still economically backward - this can be attributed to the fact that we have no private investors willing to invest in Nepal because of our unstable political conditions. If we start listing things, I guess the list goes on and on about what and how things have gone awry in Nepal. However, I will contradict myself by mentioning that coming across this article makes me question why we as Nepalese do not see the same good things that you seem to have so wonderfully pointed out. Thank you again! :)
Well said. It was impossible to be any more comprehensive at this word limit. Shivam deserves Kudos for bringing those issues to fore which are ignored so often on any discourse related to Nepal.
Particularly the comparison of the dimensions of liberty in Nepal was impressive. There are more dimensions of the difference in the way South Asian states respond to the people's aspiration to more openness and freedom.
What I would like to add in the same vein is this: while corruption is endemic in Nepal and the bouts of anarchy give a rather grim picture of the country, the extent of institutionalization of corruption seems, to me, less than that in India and elsewhere in South Asia, and the anarchy factor is potentially more manageable than that in parts of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, in longer term if capable politicians emerge.
(For a more comprehensive assessment of why Nepal may not be all that behind the southern neighbor: Five reasons why Nepalis need not resent India
@suresh: I have been to Nepal several times (as I am found of trekking) and yes, I agree to all that you said. If anyone has visited Nepal he can testify that Nepal is one of the most progressive and open (in south Asia).
It it invests in human capital it can do even better. Its bigger neighbors are inadequate in that and will suffer even more from this failure as time passes.
So Nepal is a secular federal republic that has decriminalized homosexuality. That is true for India also. How does this make it more progressive than India?
Usually nations progress economically and then become socially progressive. Nepal is weird. It is a socially progressive nation with a very, very backward economy.
Nepal is doing well, because it has too progressive giants India and China around it - no Pakistan in the neighbourhood...
If Nepal was best then why are about 10% people of working age( 18-45) are migrant worker toiling on desert of Arabia and jungle of Malaysia???? Economy of Nepal has become almost stagnant and it does to provide work for young people and they are forces to migrate. In these process numbers of them die on inhospitable working condition like in Qatar. So don't be fooled by some liberal policy Nepal has adapted !!!
Nepal is also doing its bit on cracking down on terrorists using nepali soil for nefarious activities. All the terrorists such as Yasin Bhatkal and Tunda who are "captured on India-Nepal Border" are actually captured in Nepal and handed over to India.
My best wishes to Nepal to become a Happy and prosperous place
@T
When people are unable to say anything that sounds intelligent they usually resort to ad hominen attacks, like in your case
For all non Nepalese readers, this is exactly what we feel about our own country. The situation in Nepal is just exaggerated in the international media, including in India. Election will go through and we will have constitution in place very soon.
also u dont need momey to do censorship , despite economy not growing nepal has always been the darling of donor agencies , so it is not good but money is never the prblm
@ sid , u definitely dont have any idea about nepal. n nepalese migrating to india is not illegal it is under ur constitution n my constituition as well . also there are equal number of indians working , living in nepal , just ask anybody from nepal they will tell u all the labourers farm workers all r from up and bihar . so its a two way thing , also nepal fespite its all kind of problems is most progressive country in sa, caste system is very minimal, we domt kill our gorls as u do , literacy os quite high, people are very awRe of their rights . no country has gone through so many change as nepal in last 10 years , thanks
Nepal's future is bright, just watch Chinese firms investing in Nepal to provide the impetus for the positive multiplier effect. Nepal can become the Switzerland of Asia.
@sid, You obviously have no clue about anything except Jats and Khap Panchayats (leave alone Nepal) and yet enjoy being the biggest of the loudmouths here. The question is, why.
legalizing homosexuality cannot be a barometer for progressiveness.Nepal is a lawless country....... Internet is uncensored because it doesn't have money to censor it.Kidnappings, ransoms etc are taken as normal......Most of the young women in the south of the country are in brothels of Mumbai........millions come to India as illegals to work......They have not been able to form govt for years now(But Nepalis are good people)
Don't write articles just for the heck of writing man.