Earlier this year on a trip to India, I was asked by an Indian Muslim, as to why Pakistan was created. Obviously, I gave the oft-repeated answer that it was created so that Muslims of India could live their lives in ‘freedom’. “Ah,” said this Indian Muslim, “now tell me when you go to a mosque in Pakistan, are there police checks, fear of being blown up?” I bowed my head in sadness and said, “unfortunately, yes.” With a smile on his face, he said, “I don’t.” And that was the end of the conversation. This Indian Muslim had made his point. Over 60 years later, Muslims in Pakistan are more unsafe and suffering than those in India. The fact that there have been three Muslim presidents of India, four chief justices, numerous chief ministers and cabinet ministers, including the current foreign minister, speaks volumes of how far both Indian Muslims and India itself have come in the way of national integration. The three premier Indian Muslim universities — Aligarh, Jamia Millia and Osmania — are also among the leading universities of India, and, dare I say, much better academically than any university in Pakistan. All this gives us a lot to ponder on.
As independence dawned, people expected great changes. Jinnah noted in his August 11 speech: “This mighty revolution that has taken place is unprecedented” and Nehru echoed the same and said, “A moment comes, which comes but rarely in history, when we step out from the old to the new, when an age ends, and when the soul of a nation, long suppressed, finds utterance.” On both sides, people were expecting their lives to be transformed. Years of yearning for independence had created a sense of almost divine purpose and mission.
In his speech of January 9, 1941, Franklin Roosevelt, outlined the “Four Freedoms”. He said: “In the future days ... we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms. The first is freedom of speech and expression ... The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way ... The third is freedom from want — which ... means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants ... The fourth is freedom from fear — which ... means a worldwide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbour ... ” Judged by these Four Freedoms, Pakistan is still not completely ‘free’. We do not have real freedom of speech; we do not have freedom of religion, for Muslim denominations, let alone non-Muslim religions; a very large number of our people live in poverty, illiteracy and disease; and we live not only under the fear of war and violence without but also within.
Therefore, on this independence day, perhaps, we should simply think about what ‘real freedom’ means. Not in its notional sense, but in its substantial meaning. The country aside, are we even individually ‘free’ in Pakistan, I wonder. These are grave issues, but the current state of the country should make us more aware and reflect on such realities. Let me leave you with the words of the founder of the country from that famous speech: “Now what shall we do? Now, if we want to make this great state of Pakistan happy and prosperous, we should wholly and solely concentrate on the well-being of the people, and especially of the masses and the poor. If you will work in co-operation, forgetting the past, burying the hatchet, you are bound to succeed. If you change your past and work together in a spirit that every one of you, no matter to what community he belongs, no matter what relations he had with you in the past, no matter what is his colour, caste, or creed, is first, second, and last a citizen of this state with equal rights, privileges, and obligations, there will be no end to the progress you will make.”
Hope we can listen to him.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 15th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (68)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Mr. Bangash If you are not able to answer indian on your country ideology , please don't write articles to represent Pakistan
@Milind: Highly ill informed and ridiculous analysis. No comments pls....
@Rajesh: Shabana Azmi in her interview with Leading Indian Journalist Mr Karan Thapar expressed her utmost Frustration that despite being a celebrity she could buy house in Mumbai.. because no hindu was ready to sell their house to a muslim couple.
@Romm - "I can bet Azam Premjee being muslim won’t be allowed to buy a house in a decent locality of any Metropolitan."
Before any Hindu allowing Azim Premjee any space in his locality, I feel Azim Premji would be lynched by true Muslims for belonging to the wrong sect, not being a believer (he is an agnostic/atheist for whom work is God). FYI his daughter-in-law is a Hindu. Muslims are not allowed places in metro locations because most of the rich Hindus communities are vegetarians and Muslims are unable to forgo barbaric practices like open animal slaughter, which is anathema in the civilized world.. In fact non-vegetarian Hindu communities too find it difficult to get places to stay amongst veggie Hindus.. ET - Pls publish
@Iqbal: Well articulated.It is no use throwing brickbats or counter arguments,facts and figures.they only mean to somebody who are interested in improving their knowledge.Do you,know , why there are more fools in this glorious world of ours?Because education,wisdom & knowledge are hard to accquire,to be a fool,all it takes to believe that you need nothing,one has what one need-Stupidity.It is still pleasure once in a while to find a small nugget of diamond in a pile of rock,that's how all great diamond are found.Even in this futile blog very few have made a difference,no minds are changed,every one is'Lakir ka Fakir',period.If I have to cut the chase,muslims all over the world have tough times,there are many reasons,some less some more.One things stand out, modern education and fertility.Unless something is done by Muslims themselves,it is waste of time,whisling in strong wind,no one will hear.I know one thing as I have lived and educated in Osmania,HYD,more harm is done to decent vast majority of Muslims(indian) have been harmed by Pakistani mindless behavior,I earnestly hope,Pakistani Muslims will earn Allah's blessing if they butt out from 'helping' Indian muslims. Indians muslims a vast majority have become suspect in their own land ,just because their fore fathers made the mistake of converting.There is nothing one can do about it,if I were a Muslim,I will remain a Muslim,but would feel the way you feel.Be good,nice day.H.Mani
@Iqbal: Iqbal, the first requiste for progress is to accept the problem. I wish, hope and pray that are more people (of all communities) like you, the writer of the article and some others who have been ratiional and accept the truth and try to improve themselves. Education is very important and people who believe in the koran must accept that it was meant for that time with general guidelines for posterity, not each and every word. Most religious books have a philosophy for all time as it aims at theprogress of the human spirit while the rest of the part in each book deals with the problems of the time. All, including believers in the Koran, have to accept this fact to progress. An example of how ignorance and selfishness can harm is by looking at some people who say they believer in the Koran and smoke and take drugs because they say the Koran does not forbid them to do so while they do not drink saying it is forbidden!
@Taha: I guess that's because Pakistan is an 'Islamic republic' while I ndia is secular, at least in name...
@Feroz: Well said!
@Uza Syed I have a Temple in my House & my spouse is still Hindu, so what? I think i have read somewhere that: "You go to your faith & I will go to mine"
Friend that is a fundamental problem of majority of Muslims & we should overcome this Evil
TO ALL PAKISTANI FRIENDS: My name is AN Excellent example of Freedom & Equality in India. People tells u better than any Propaganda, Just think about it what i said Gulam Rasool kuldeep sharma New Delhi
@Zeeshan Ali: When you add all the numbers you mentioned above, the figure you obtain is less than the no. of muslims killed in Pakistan last year! Stop worrying about people of other nations, get your house in order first!
@Akbaruddin: Even as an Indian I say this to you sir -- one of the BEST REPLIES I have ever seen!!
@ET whats wrong with u if some1 tries to expose imperialists?what stops u from publishng this FACT that Division of India was division of muslims and nothing else and in accordance with divide and rule. Disappointg!where is freedom of speech
@Romm - "Pameerji is married to a HUNDU lady is itself an arguement to support my point. Cheers!" - What is your point? Is it that if SRK hadn't been married to a Hindu girl then he wouldn't have been as successful? What about Dilip Kumar, Waheeda Rahman, Nargis (she was successful before she got married), Meena kumari, Shabana Azmi? No matter how hard you try, the truth is that people don't wear religion on their sleeves in this country. Religion is considered a personal matter of an individual and no one gives a damn about who is married to him except for a very small minority of fundamentalists.
read more about the real freedom of Pakistan.. http://rationalinferences.wordpress.com/2013/08/15/independenceofpk/
@Sagheer Ahmed:
Even based on the Sachar committe statistics, muslims in India are better off than Pakistan (per captia income, Literacy level etc.).
As a true Pakistani Muslim, my heart bleeds when I know the plight of Muslims in India, China, Burma, Srilanka, Palestina, UK and USA but not in Pakistan because there are no real Muslims.
@Sagheer Ahmed: If your stastics are true in spirit, why Malala was forced & shot. May you explain? Am i wrong.
@Rajesh: Pameerji is married to a HUNDU lady is itself an arguement to support my point. Cheers!
@Singh: And that is not counting what the Pakistani Army did in what was then East Pakistan in 1970-71. More than 3,00,000 civilians raped, tortured and killed.
@Zeeshan Ali: Your total is 11845 in 67 Yr. & according to claim by by your own govt more than 100K been killed in last 10 yr. due to various reason.
mr bangash india is a big country we can't generalize,if muslims in india feel secure and happy, we should be happy for them, but sadly that's not always the case, in places likke gujarat they are forced to live in ghettoes. according to sachar report 3% of undergraduates and 1% of post graduates in indian universities are muslim. since muslims are 15% of india's population that means they are vastly underrepresented. to make muslim a president that's no big deal, as mj akbar once said give muslim unemployed 10,000 clerical jobs is better than making muslim a president.
@Sagheer Ahmed: Your argument seems to be flawed. You seem to be suggesting that muslims are discriminated in India but conveniently ignore that all is OK in Pakistan. This report highlights the hatred towards hindus: http://beta.dawn.com/news/672000/pakistan-schools-teach-hindu-hatred To best judge whether hindus or muslims have progressed or not is to look in a region where none of them are in majority and where better then in the West where there has been a lot of research into this. This 2002 report published by the UK Government highlights how people from the sub continent have progressed in UK: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/feb/20/race.immigrationpolicy You will note that the hindus have progressed so well in the West that they have also overtaken the local people. The muslims continue to go downhill partly because we do not take education seriously and blame others for the wrongs we do. The madrassa education has not helped and the bearded mullahs are running the agenda. I note you have mentioned that the prison population in India has 40% of muslims. You appear to be suggesting that they are discriminated. Now compare the same prison statistics of UK in this Government report: www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn04334.pdf You will note on page 11 that the muslim population in UK is 4% but the prison population is a whopping 13.1% implying that we are more then 3 times likely to commit a crime. The hindus share 1.5% of UK’s population but their prison population is only 0.5%. You ask any mathematician and he or she will tell you that when you compare the same results to India’s prison population the muslim population in their jails should be more and not less. You and I have to accept that we muslims are now failing and we need to address it. You and I are paying the price for the wrong decisions taken by our ancestors. I have accepted it, I hope you will.
@Romm:
SRKs wife happens to be Hindu. So he has a temple in his house. What is so wrong?
@Romm: And if Premji's father had made the mistake of moving to Pakistan, he'd be a potential target by now for simply being an Ismaili Shia Khoja. Also, least of all, it would have been highly unlikely that he'd be the owner of a multi-billion dollar IT business if he were a muslim living in there today.
@Raw is War
Not even a single Indian here who is honest.
"I can bet Azam Premjee being muslim won’t be allowed to buy a house in a decent locality of any Metropolitan. To survive in ultra polarised and well propagated so called secular Indian Society Shah Rukh has to pretend be ultra secular by making Hindu temple in his house. Isn’t this Incredible." - Premji lives in a locality where 99.9999999999% of Indians can only dream of living and is less rich than just 3-4 Indians anywhere in the world. If you think that is discrimination then nothing can be done about your false perception. Shah Rukh doesn't have to pretend to be ultra secular because he is married to a Hindu who didn't convert her religion. No one can help if you have any issues with him having a temple in his house because in civilized world your comment would be perceived as 'religious bigotry".
Soul-searching is imperative for all of us. A small correction--- While most of the students of Aligarh, Jamia and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad ( a central varsity based in Hyderabad) universities are muslim, I wonder if one can call them muslim university. Osmania University, the first university with Urdu as a medium of instruction, is english medium institution since 1950s. However, all these institutions are rated as among the top.
Instead of getting into unnecessary debate about India vs. Pakistan. One should accept our failing and seriously search for a solution of the issues that threaten our very existence from within. This is what I understood what Mr Bangash is wisely asking us all here.
I can bet Azam Premjee being muslim won't be allowed to buy a house in a decent locality of any Metropolitan. . To survive in ultra polarised and well propagated so called secular Indian Society Shah Rukh has to pretend be ultra secular by making Hindu temple in his house. Isn't this Incredible.
@Faqir Ipi: Shahrukh Khan is probably the highest earning Muslim entertainer in the World. How much does the richest non Muslim in Pakistan earn ? Have you heard of Azim Premjee ? His net worth is around ten billion Dollars. He must have been heavily discriminated against to have earned that fortune, isnt it ? Time to come out of the Gulag you have been living in.
At least one Pakistani who is honest.
@Sagheer Ahmed: A few reasons for this: Muslims are concentrated in UP and Bihar, where the economic situation and literacy rates are low for everybody. Muslims tend to have larger families. Girls tend to get married at an earlier age, there is an extra generation in the span of a few decades. The Muslim population which was 11% at the time of partition is now around 16%. An answer has already been given to you about the Sachar Committee Report.
@Arifq: @Faqir Ipi: @Zeeshan Ali: @irfan iftekhar: @Sagheer Ahmed:
Next time you want to see the reason why Pakistan is a failed state, stand in front of a mirror and you will be staring at the answer.
@Ali Tanoli
"India or Pakistan both have same Grumpy Raj laws where getting justice is like spending twenty years in Israeli jail and still calling great democracy in Mideast and its a same india’"
Why did you bring Israeli jail? Do you know Israeli jails well?
Forget Israel man. Israel has got nothing to do with the subcontinent. They don't care about us. let them be.
Mr.Bangash, You are a rare individual, I admire your honesty.
@Sagheer Ahmed: If discrimination and oppression by Hindus is the reason for muslim backwardness, Pakistan and Bangladesh should have become Superpowers after 66 years. Especially in the case of Pakistan, you have nearly 100% eliminated the Hindu population. You should be the most progressed top notch country of the world ;-)))
oh you are still so back ward, and disintegrating because you have a Hindu neighbor...never mind.
This is going out to be an all out war where Pakistanis would bring up issues of Godhra riots etc and Indians would talk about the shrinking of Hindu Population from 25% to 1%....
But at the end of the day,lets say India persecutes its minorities,what difference does it make to a common man in Pakistan who is always looking at the sky for signs of a drone
or what difference does Pakistan make to an common Indian who is working hard in the world of corrupt officials and politicians to make his ends meet....
Its Independence Day,so lets try to build our country rather than focussing on others....South Korea never loses sleep on the human rights violations in North Korea.....
Author "Indian Muslim, “now tell me when you go to a mosque in Pakistan, are there police checks, fear of being blown up?” I bowed my head in sadness and said, “unfortunately, yes.” With a smile on his face, he said, “I don’t.”
Indian Muslim did not complain or ask how he can move to land of PURE? He just asked one question and proved his point that Pakistan is a dangerous place.
@Romm: Did you read the article ? The author was told; now read carefully (if you know how) - “Ah,” said this Indian Muslim, “now tell me when you go to a mosque in Pakistan, are there police checks, fear of being blown up?” I bowed my head in sadness and said, “unfortunately, yes.”
With a smile on his face, he said, “I don’t.”
Bas itni si baat hai...
@Atheist secular liberal Indian:
@Atheist secular liberal Indian: If for instance I do agree with your finding that Muslims are narrow minded and don't want to study Science etc. then why same Muslim in Pakistan are having higher literacy rate. According to the World Bank Indicators – (2008)
Literacy rate; youth female (% of females ages 15-24) in Pakistan 61.3 Ratio of young literate females to males (% ages 15-24) in Pakistan 77.1 Literacy rate; youth male (% of males ages 15-24) in Pakistan 79.4 Literacy rate; youth total (% of people ages 15-24) in Pakistan 71.1
According to 2013 ranking there are three universities of Pakistan among the top 200 world universities as while seven universities in to the list of top 250 Asian universities and none of these offer degree in Islamic studies as you mentioned.
i'm a british citizen what i'm going to say is not because of spite or animosity towards british, just merely stating the facts. british weren't interested in providing universal free education to indians during their rule, nor were they interested in industralising it, what was in their interest they did, built railways which served dual purpose, troops as well as goods movement. built a few major cities and ports. provide education and health facilities in major cities. whole swathe of indian territory was hardly touched by british rule basically left to their own devices. the british also played the game of divide and rule, this isn't some indian invention, iv'e read it myself in british school text book.
the post colonial state of pakistan has more or less done same, concentrate development in major cities. when we look at other countries that successfully developed, japan, china they developed whole country, not just a few cities. india has probably done better than pakistan, but not much.
@ Author after writing such a lengthy and controversial piece of paper in a Pakistani Website while teaching in a pakistani University, u still say, We in Pakistan do not have FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION. Undoubtedly Hypocratic.
@Atheist secular liberal Indian
You seem to have gotten the meaning of the term "narrow minded" the wrong way. Although I did get what you meant to say, I just hope others ignore that mistake and understand your point, especially the Pakistani commenters here. As for Pakistanis, instead of trying to find faults in Indian Muslims or how Muslims are "treated badly in India", it would be better for your own self if you try to fix your own nation and not worry about Muslims in India and elsewhere. Because no matter what your own beliefs are about the conditions of Muslims in India, I can assure you they are definitely way better than the ones in Pakistan. Not just the Muslims, all communities are safer and prospering in India. The "evil Hindus" have not forced them to convert into Hindus, so you better focus on your own country. And try to learn the message from this article of this author who himself is a Pakistani. He means well and I'm pretty sure he is not a RAW agent.
@ Jat i do not think i mentioned that word RAW in my post.and i had just replied to what he said about that muslim guy he met in india.and yes i am living in a free country put muslims aside wt happened to all minorities in india you need facts here they are 1969 Gujarat riots 430 muslims killed 1980 moradabad riots nearly 2000 muslims killed Nellie massacare in Assam 2100 muslims killed 1984 anti sikh riots 4000 sikhs killed 1984 haryana riots 36 sikhs killed 1987 hashimpura riots 44 muslims killed 1989 baghalpura riots 1100 muslims killed bombay riots 1992 -1993 1125 muslims killed sopore masacare 55 muslims killed 2002 gujrat 790 muslims killed gulbarg riots 70 muslims naroda ahmedabad 95 muslims
In the eyes of the average Pakistani - state is religion and religion is state. The two are inexorably muddled in their minds. That is diametrically opposite from the concept of separating religion and faith that is so cherished and so dearly safeguarded in every liberal and secular society that is in existence today.
Ironically enough, Pakistan does neither statehood nor religious freedom right. The shining examples of religious coexistence come from those aforementioned liberal, secular societies.
There was a mention in another article that quoted Jinnah as saying "Islam invented democracy 1400 years ago" or something to that effect. There is not one single example of such an Islamic democracy anywhere. Almost all successful democracies are modeled on Western model.
I can't talk to the conditions that prevailed 1400 years ago but here in the present time mixing religion and state is a terrible idea and one that has been shown to fail over and over again.
During the creation of India and Pakistan it was thought that India is impractical due to it's diversity and Pakistan a practical idea because of it's homogeneity 66 years down the line you find the reverse the reason is that the idea of India was inclusive and the idea of Pakistan exclusive in nature so even though the differences are many and many are poor as somebody pointed but still are part of our nation because of it's inclusiveness and many Pakistanis have now become Balochis,Sindhis,Punjabis,Ahmadis,Shias and Sunnis despite the homogeneity because of exclusiveness
Indian muslims are in far better shape than Bengaladeshi Hindus.
Sure riots happen every decade or so but nothing compared to Pakistan.
As for minorities. Again the Pakistani space program has a better track record vis a vis India than its Minorities Ministry.
Pakistanis who are Muslims first regard freedom very differently. Where the western educated person talks of worldly narratives, Pakistanis regard the same world as a temporary abode, more of a holding place. Our real destination is the afterlife, therefore for us freedom can only come by being liberated from this world.
U need to go into the root cause...all those people saying that muslims in India are unemployed and all.......first of all....Muslims are not a narrow minded society....they never want to read science,commerce or history......all they want to do is read relegious books and make world invention and patents...which is not possible in this pragmatic world...u need to see the world from practical perspective...Indian's are best in saving money and money is spent on education which is the no 1 priority of Indian middle class...be it muslims/hindus etc...and let me give u a staraight example...................Jains/sikhs/parsis are no hindu..............but they contribute almost 100% of their community in well being of this country......among jains/sikhs/parsis literacy rate is 99%................how come a non hindu about 5-10 crore in number grew up in india......the answer my friend is simple..........they are narrow minded and knows the importance of science/commerce and arts .............on the other hand whenever I heard of a pakistani Phd or masters he might have own a degree in Islamic studies or muslim studies.............I am yet to witness an Indian who holds a degree in Hindu studies/christian studies/jain,parsi,sikh,dravidian,buddhist studies........
I am still in doubt ET will publish my comment...but i have a say....sorry if i offend anyone
@Sagheer Ahmed:
1)The reason is Muslims In India did not enjoy positive affirmative actions like Dalits.
2) Upper middle class and educated Muslims in undivided India migrated to Pakistan leaving Indian Muslims without leadership
3)Muslim families especially from lower middle class and poor do not want their girls to be educated after certain level of education.Muslim girls are married at lower age and have higher fertility . Only half of Indian Muslim girls can read and write
4) Historically Muslims have not taken unto modern western education compared to other Indian communities
5) Lingering discrimination against Muslims because of their overwhelming support to Pakistani Ideology at the time of partition
Central thesis the the essay by the author Bangash is still valid that despite occasional riots Indian Muslims especially diverse Muslim sects enjoy better personal security In India compared to Pakistani Muslims .
The statistics for Muslims In South India are better than that of Pakistan "Southern India is a different picture. Larger cultural and social movements have made education more accessible and self employment more lucrative benefiting a large number of Muslims," says historian Mahesh Rangarajan.
In Andhra Pradesh state, for example, 68% of Muslims are literate, higher than the state and national average. School enrolment rates for Muslim children are above 90% in Kerala and Tamil Nadu."http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6938090.stm
Total illiteracy rate for Indian Muslim is 59% compared to 57% for Pakistani muslims
Saghher Ahmed is also correct that Indian Muslims are worse off compared to other Indian communities .http://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/apr/05/india.randeepramesh1
The Question is whether partition overall benefited Muslims on either side of the border
Pakistan is a young country facing multiple challenges. The founders had envisioned a progressive, vibrant and tolerant Pakistan. Unfortunately, Pakistan has been engulfed in an internal crisis, and its survival is being challenged by the terrorists within. In his statement on Pakistan’s Independence Day today, Ambassador Olsen sums up beautifully when congratulating Pakistanis, he stated, “This is a particularly historic Independence Day because the citizens of Pakistan participated in a historic transition earlier this year. As Secretary Kerry said during his recent visit to Pakistan, “The people of Pakistan deserve enormous credit for their role in the peaceful transition of power from one democratically-elected government to another.” The United States remains committed to supporting the people of Pakistan in achieving the strong, stable, and secure nation that Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah envisioned for Pakistan in 1947. The United States shares this vision and is dedicated to ensuring our common objectives of helping Pakistan to meet its urgent energy needs, educate its growing population, eliminate the sources of violence and terrorism that have afflicted Pakistani society, and provide economic opportunities to all.”
Abdul Quddus DET-United States Central Command
@Zeeshan Ali: So you think this newspaper and this author are RAW agents ? What about Babar Ayaz, a veteran journalist who has recently written a book "What’s wrong with Pakistan?? Another RAW agent ? And M Ziauddin, executive editor of this newspaper ? RAW agent right ?
@Sagheer Ahmed - Most of the Elite Muslims of India left for Pakistan in 1947 leaving the Muslims with poor socio-economic conditions in India. If all the Elite Hindus of North India were to migrate to South India, the statistics that you have quoted wouldn't be very different for Hindus as well in North India. There are millions of Muslims in India who are in far better economic condition than many many Hindus.
Dnt you had courage or guts to ask that Muslim that what he thinks of his brothers who cant even go to mosques in indian occupied kashmir why dnt you asked that what he thinks of all the women who are being raped in indian occupid kashmir.who killed those people who were giving azan in kashmir,now lets come to the independent india who killed 1500 sikhs in golden temple in 1 night.Who burnt alive a christian family of Mr staines on 22 January 1999 in manoharpur,who had been killing muslim men and women with swords in gujrat.how did he forgot the slit of breasts of muslim womens in trains coming from india in 1947.and yes we are being checked when going to mosque cz they are funding these merceneries and there so called jihadis who attack on mosques and imam bargahs being a muslim u must know that a muslim cannot do such a thing with a place where people use to pray.
Bollywood king Shahrukh Khan has exposed so-called secular face of world largest democracy: India, expressing his agony he is facing for being born as a Muslim.
Shah Rukh Khan “Being a Khan”: what it means to be a Muslim in the Post 9/11 world. I sometimes become the inadvertent object of political leaders who choose to make me a symbol of all that they think is wrong and unpatriotic about Muslims in India. There have been occasions when I have been accused of bearing allegiance to our neighbouring nation (Pakistan) rather than my own country – this even though I am an Indian, whose father fought for the freedom of India. Rallies have been held where leaders have exhorted me to leave and return what they refer to my ‘original’ homeland. I gave my son and daughter names that could pass for generic (pan-India and pan-religious) ones – Aryan and Suhana. The Khan has been bequeathed by me so they can’t really escape it. I pronounce it with my epiglottis when asked by Muslims and throw the Aryan as evidence of their race when non-Muslims enquire. I imagine this will prevent my offspring from receiving unwarranted eviction orders or random fatwas in the future. SRK also added that he became so sick of being mistaken for some crazed terrorist, “who co-incidentally carries the same name as mine that I made a film subtly titled ‘My Name Is Khan’ (and I am not a terrorist) to prove a point.” Ironically, I was interrogated at the airport for hours about my last name when I was going to promote the film in America for the first time.
when roosevelt uttered those words USA wasn't what we may call a bastion of freedom and equality as we know it today. it only favoured white european immigrants, american blacks were treated as second class citizens. it hounded communists and socialists, and imprisoned many of them, the world's favourite tramp charlie chaplin fled to switzerland, because of his socialist views. america put its own citizens of japanese extraction in concentration camps during the war.
Your article looks like it has been penned in the 'bandish' of Wordsworth or Keats. My dear friend things are not so easy to understand till you read Chanakya.
We dont have freedom of speech?!
What more do you want?
Dear Yaqoob khan, It was very sad to know that you were left with no answer while talking to an indian muslim in India. Let me give you an answer so next time even a Hindu ask you this question you can answer him with confidence and pride.
According to the report, produced by a committee led by a former chief justice of India, Rajender Sachar, Muslims are now worse off in India than the Dalits, or those oncecalled untouchables by the Brahmins. Some 52% of Muslim men are unemployed, compared with 47% of Dalit men. Among Muslim women, 91% are unemployed, compared with 77% of Dalit women.
Almost half of Muslims over the age of 46 can’t read or write. While making up nearly 14% of the total population of the country, Muslims account for 40% of India's prison population. They hold only 4.9 percent of government jobs and only 3.2 percent of the jobs in the country's security agencies, thus creating a new set of ‘untouchable Indians’ in the modern democratic republic of India.
Official data is, at least, enough to figure out that in the post independent India Muslim community remained downwards economically in comparison to all other majority or minority communities and with authentic findings in hand as we have now through National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) and the Sachar Committee Report (SCR)about the profile of second religious majority group of India.
Still if you need more reasons behind the creation of Pakistan, and the hopes and aspirations it brought with itself, please feel free to ask me for it!
When India made his nuclear bomb (with the help of a local muslim) no one said that Muslims have Nuclear bomb now. But after few days when Pakistan did his test than world was saying "Muslims got Atom Bomb". That is the difference my friend....
God bless you, Mr. Bangash! . As someone who is a citizen of India and who has lived across the world, I learned something today through your article in the words of FDR. I feel that we in India have delivered on the first 2 freedoms but not on the last 2. Surprisingly I find that nor has the US. A lot of food for thought for me personally. It is no wonder that FDR is by far the most admired president to date based on surveys conducted in the US.
God bless you, Mr. Bangash! . As someone who is a citizen of India and who has lived across the world, I learned something today through your article in the words of FDR. I feel that we in India have delivered on the first 2 freedoms but not on the last 2. Surprisingly I find that nor has the US. A lot of food for thought for me personally. It is no wonder that FDR is by far the most admired president to date based on surveys conducted in the US.
This was Pakistan in British India.Two nobel Prizes to Punjab University Khurana and Physicist. What have we become now? A country of Zombies?