Anarkali blast: Investigators mystified by explosives’ make

No shrapnel or ball bearings used; similar ingredients employed in previous explosions.


Akbar Bajwa July 08, 2013
The blast site is a popular food street that sees a lot of people come for a night out. PHOTO: ABID NAWAZ/EXPRESS

LAHORE: Police investigators were left mystified by the lack of any shrapnel or ball bearing in the explosives used to rock Lahore’s bustling Anarkali food street on Saturday night.

The staple militant tactic is to cause maximum death and destruction through packing their explosive devices with these two ‘essentials’, leading some to conclude that this might not be the work of terror outfits, but an upshot of business rivalry.

This point is highlighted in the initial report prepared by a joint investigation team probing the Lahore market blast.

According to the initial report, the explosives used in the blast were identical to those employed in the 2010 Iqbal Town and Taxali Gate cracker explosions. Moreover, the railway station blast, which had claimed two lives in the city last year, also had similar ingredients.

The report says explosive material of the bomb weighed around 2kg-2.5kg and had no ball bearing or shrapnel; however it did contain glass pieces.

According to a CIA official glass pieces of bottles from a soda water stall also aggravated the situation and slashed through bodies of people, becoming a major reason for deaths.

The police also obtained footage captured by the CCTV installed at some shops to identify the culprits.

During search operations carried out in several localities including Lytton Road, Jain Mandir, Mauj Darya, Mozang Adda near Anarkali area, the police arrested more than hundred people. The CCPO Lahore told the media that at least seven of the arrested people were suspected of being directly involved in the blast.

Joint Investigation Team Head Zulfiqar Hameed said groups that had been arrested in the past over their involvement in similar crime would be interrogated to get a lead in the case.



He said apparently the target was ordinary diners. He said police had drafted the initial report with input from bomb disposal squad after gathering evidence and recording witness accounts.

After final forensic checking, the police reopened the food street for general public later in the evening.

Meanwhile, the death toll from the cracker blast rose to five. Out of the 50 people who suffered injuries and admitted to different hospitals, eight people at the Mayo Hospital sustained serious wounds, nine were discharged today.

Blast’s other dimensions

The police are reviewing all possible dimensions of the Anarkali incident as investigation officials are under immense pressure after the blast, which hit a high security zone, home to many important government offices.

According to initial reports, the hotel that was targeted in the blast had been a gambling den for several years. The investigation has also included hotel owner, Bodi Gujjer, against whom many cases are registered with the police. In his initial statement, Bodi Gujjer said he had rented out his hotel and whatever activity had been going on in there was not in his knowledge.

Investigation police suspects that personal rivalry could also be a reason behind the attack as the explosive material, though of high quantity, had no ball bearings or shrapnel.

Investigation officers revealed that apart from Meyo Bokhara restaurant, several other hotels in the food street are also used as gambling dens.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 8th, 2013.

COMMENTS (3)

Zo. | 10 years ago | Reply

@wth. The reference is to a police department incharge of investigations. If memeory serves me right, the abbreviation stands for Crime Investigation Agency

Tanveer Ahmed | 10 years ago | Reply

What a freedom of speech..It is amazing to see how journalists in Pakistan can get all kind of initial reports. This only serves the purpose of culprits who can easily keep themselves updated about strategies of investigators.

No where in the free world this is allowed because media knows its responsibility.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ