Why power outages are mostly our own fault

How problems in each segment of the energy chain compound those in the next segment.


In the power sector, the debt is very clearly not the only thing that is circular. PHOTO: INP

KARACHI:


For all the enormous technical complications involved in running a nationwide electricity grid, the problem that ails the country’s power sector today is a remarkably simple one: Pakistan has an energy crisis almost entirely because a large proportion of Pakistanis are thieves who do not want to pay for electricity.


This week, The Express Tribune attempts to take a comprehensive look at the power sector and examine the causes for the massive power shutdowns. Our goal in this report is not to look at what the problem is currently, but how it arose in the first place and what can be done to fix it.

The picture we come up with is grim. At virtually every stage of the energy cycle, there are massive problems with either the government’s planning or execution, and frequently both, a fact that becomes easier to understand when one realises that the government has never had a comprehensive national energy policy.



Our special report is divided up into four segments, each one covering a different segment of the energy chain: sources of primary energy, power generation, transmission, and distribution.

The problem starts at the very beginning, with a fuel mix that is skewed towards the most expensive kinds. There is an absurdly large reliance on oil, for instance, which is virtually unheard of in countries without substantial oil reserves of their own. Not nearly enough investment has gone into increasing hydroelectric power generation, which is the most expensive to set up but the cheapest to run on a per unit basis.

At every subsequent stage, the problem keeps on compounding, the mistakes of the previous stage being magnified by the inefficiencies of every successive segment of the supply chain.

The poor fuel mix translates into electricity generation being more expensive than it needs to be. The expensive electricity, coupled with exceedingly poor rule of law, in turn encourages outright theft of electricity and leaves little for maintenance of the infrastructure, which causes yet more rises in the cost of producing electricity. And finally, an unwillingness of the government to force people to pay their bills results in yet more losses.



The key problem in all of this, however, is the propensity of a large proportion of Pakistanis to steal electricity and the government’s unwillingness to confront them. Our analysis indicates that if transmission losses in Pakistan were kept at a level similar to that of the United States, and if bill collection were close to 100%, tariffs would need to rise by a relatively meagre 7.7% from their current average levels.

The problem, of course, is that theft is not going away in Pakistan any time soon. And so we have, effectively, a nation that steals electricity, pays no taxes, and then complains when the government runs out of money to pay for the electricity that they stole in the first place. In the power sector, the debt is very clearly not the only thing that is circular.

The problem cannot be resolved until the stealing is stopped. Locking up everyone who steals electricity is clearly not possible, but incentivising good behaviour is very much within reach. In this, the government would do well to carefully examine the model of the Karachi Electric Supply Company, which has spent considerable time and resources in figuring out which areas have high theft and which have low theft, and then provided relatively uninterrupted supply to areas where people do not steal electricity.

In the weeks since the election, the country is going through a unique moment: when two of the largest political parties in the country broadly agree on the contours of a solution to the energy crisis. This is a moment that is unlikely to return in the future. If the country’s leaders fail now, it may be lights out on the Pakistani economy for a very long time to come.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 3rd, 2013.

Like Business on Facebook to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (24)

Ali Syedain | 10 years ago | Reply

Entice current KESC management to head select urban ESCOs (KESC has some six current or ex-MD/DMDs). (Gestation 3 years before results come in)

Sell LESCO to KESC. Privatise distribution companies methodically (3 years for privatisation; another 3 for results)

Import electricity from India (if possible; indecision and uncertainty on this project will KILL all other projects) (Gestation period 2 years)

Quickly announce private power generation policy that specifically addresses run-of-the-river plants. This needs generous concessions from the GoP and will open the administration to "rental power-like" accusations. (Gestation period 5-8 years)

Set up LNG import and re-gassification plant to import gas. Set up IPPs based on this gas.(Gestation period 4-5 years)

Once financing for the LNG terminal closes, announce to stick with Pakistan-Iran pipeline, though you will not be able to finance IPPs based on this gas, you can convert existing consumption on imported gas, while new generation capacity can be based on Sui, etc. (Gestation period 2 years; yes, there is no typo)

Divide Punjab into 2/3 provinces and, in return, get Sindh to agree on Kalabagh.

The Musharraf energy policy lingered due to indecision. Lets not repeat the mistake.

Khurrum | 10 years ago | Reply What False and wrong stats totally incorrect in FATA there is not a single meter installed and no one pays a single rupee as bill of electricty and yet the article says that it has line losses of 29% , actually in fata the line losses is 100% and in pakhtunkhwa in peshawar all the meters are outside on poles and we pay the Highest amount of per unit price in electric bill and yet the article says that line losses are 36% another lie and false stats , as Tesco which is wrongly stated as Tepco in this ariticle for fata electricty company is part of pakhtunkhwa Pesco and the 36% line losses are actually that of fata whihc are charged from Pesco , the Pakthunkhwa electric company so we have 36% line losses because it is policy of federal govt not to charge electricty Bills from Tribal areas of fata as they want to give this free electricty bills to Taliban Terrorirsts This lines loses should be paid by federal govt and not by pakhtunkhwa as FATA is federeal area but we are dfrauded by federation and it is scam that media does not even report it correctly including this article whihc had wrong stats unfortunately , it is yellow journalism and fraud with Nation Tribune should apologise and give correct stats . it is beyond common sense where there are no meters how can there be 29% line losses and not 100% .
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ