The spur for signing this treaty, which we have not done since it was proposed in 1985, according to a report in this newspaper (and never denied by the outgoing government) is just one woman. Ever since she was convicted for shooting at US soldiers at a base in Afghanistan, Aafia Siddiqi has become a cause celebre in Pakistan. According to the technical terms of the treaty, Aafia Siddiqi should then be brought back home to serve out the remainder of her long sentence.
If we are indeed willing to sign this treaty, only in the hope that Aafia Siddiqi will return to Pakistan, then we are in for a rude awakening. The US is not about to send a person they believe to be involved in terrorism, even if she was convicted in a civilian court for a different crime, back to Pakistan. It believes, quite rightly as it happens, that Pakistan will simply bow to public pressure and release her should she come back here. On top of that, the treaty will not apply to all those Pakistanis who languish in Guantanamo Bay since they have never appeared in a civilian court. We should sign this treaty because it is the right thing to do; not because it will appease the public.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 24th, 2013.
COMMENTS (1)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Spot on - no way the American's are going to trust Pakistan and release Aafia Siddiqui. Pakistan is not considered trustworthy by the American's - your word (written or spoken) justifiably carries little weight. I should add that the American's released Pakistani prisoners from Guantanamo to you based on your promise that you would monitor them - a promise that was quickly forgotten. Lastly - given a choice I wonder suspect Siddiqui would prefer an American jail or Pakistani jail?