Fading hopes: Pakistan clerics reject Kabul moot invitation

Demand clarification over anti-Taliban remarks from Afghan clerics in 48 hours,.


Tahir Khan February 18, 2013
Another group of Pakistani clerics declined to participate in the moot unless the Afghan clerics’ council clarifies anti-Taliban remarks by one of its members in 48 hours. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: Days after a council of Pakistani clerics announced a boycott of the much-anticipated ulema conference in Kabul, another group of Pakistani clerics on Sunday declined to participate in the moot unless the Afghan clerics’ council clarifies anti-Taliban remarks by one of its members in 48 hours.

The fresh move diminishes hopes further regarding the conference, which was twice delayed in the past three months due to controversies.

According to the head of the Majlis Sutul Islam (Voice of Islam), Mufti Abu Hurraira Muhiuddin – a member of the Pakistani religious scholars’ committee which met Afghan clerics in Islamabad last week as part of preparations for the ulema conference – the remarks by members of the Afghan clerics’ council had put the fate of the meeting in doubt.

“Afghan scholars’ remarks against the Afghan Taliban have created a deadlock… we have written to the chief of the Afghan Ulema Council Maulvi Qayyamuddin Kashaf to clarify the statements in 48 hours,” he maintained.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 18th, 2013.

COMMENTS (2)

Someone | 11 years ago | Reply

For peace in Afghanistan to prevail, you cannot label one side bad and one side good, otherwise there will be continuing violence. All sides have to be stakeholders in this....

Feroz | 11 years ago | Reply

This will put at rest all charitable doubts about which force is fanning extremism. It is Pakistan that seems to be home to all color of Taliban sympathizers, not the Afghans who are the victims but now wise enough to know who real enemies are.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ