The case for stricter gun control is airtight. No one is asking for hunting rifles and other types of weapons to be banned. Right now, just getting the most dangerous weapons off the streets should be a priority. The US is both, one of the most heavily-armed and most violent nations in the world. The correlation is obvious for all to see. Multiple studies have shown that gun control leads to a significant decline in violence. As we have seen in Karachi, when people have easy access to weaponry they will invariably use it for violent means.
The most unfortunate part is that the gun lobby is really strong in the US, making it unlikely to spur US politicians into action. One would think that the safety of children in schools would trump the blood-stained money politicians get from the gun lobby but this has not proven to be the case. It will take extraordinarily bold leadership to move the debate on the issue and that has been sadly lacking, with President Obama scarcely better than his predecessors. There is no point mourning over a national tragedy if everyone is just going to return to their normal lives without doing anything to fix the problem. The murdered schoolchildren in Connecticut deserve better.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 17th, 2012.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@cautious: " The perpetrator was an adult – no criminal or mental history – eligible to purchase a number of extremely lethal weapons under the most likely gun control scenario’s"
Perpetrator's mother was trying to get him admitted to a mental Institution. She had to go through court system to get papers for that. Looks like doctor's treating this young man failed to diagnose his mental illness. He killed kids because he thought his mother loved school kids more then him. It is about mental illness and gun control.
I picked up this information from various news stories on the Internet.
Nice sentiment but rather naive. What specific control does the Editor believe would have stopped this tragedy? The perpetrator was an adult - no criminal or mental history - eligible to purchase a number of extremely lethal weapons under the most likely gun control scenario's. A shotgun or any number of rifles would have caused similar havoc. All the fees, licenses, monitoring etc create the illusion of control but none of that would have had any influence over this tragic event.