How do you solve a problem like Modi?

Congress should ease the divisive current which is damaging Gujarat and provoking violence around the country.


Aakar Patel December 08, 2012

What should India’s Congress party do in Gujarat? The state goes to elections in the next few days and the party has no plan or idea.

We know this because one of its leaders who quit the party last week revealed this. Former Gujarat deputy chief minister Narhari Amin says he had a conversation with Rahul Gandhi in Delhi and was asked two things: why wasn’t Gujarat voting for the Congress any longer and what could the party do to bring voters back?

I think that’s the wrong way of looking at it. The problem in Gujarat is that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is ruling over a divided society. A strong current of anti-Muslim prejudice runs through the state and it has taken the Supreme Court to give justice by sending in impartial investigating teams.

The fact is that a minister in Narendra Modi’s cabinet has been convicted of the slaughter of over 90 Muslims. Another minister has just come out of jail and is again contesting, despite serious criminal charges.

Remarkably, Sonia Gandhi has not raised any of this in her two campaign rallies in Gujarat, though these are very recent developments.

The reason for her reticence in bringing up such things is that she is being advised that Gujaratis are communal by nature and talk of such activity will only send them further towards the BJP.

The man giving her this advice is Ahmed Patel, a Gujarati who is her political manager. Patel last fought an election in the state 27 years ago and has since been in Delhi. He no longer has much first-hand knowledge of the ground reality of the state electorally, but interferes in the distribution of tickets.

Under his tutoring, the Congress has made some dreadful mistakes, including putting a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh man, Shankarsinh Vaghela, in charge of the party’s state unit. If Gujaratis want communal venom, they can get it from the BJP. No point in the Congress peddling the same stuff.

Even after it has backed off from pointing to the awful communal record of the BJP in Gujarat, the Congress is losing. Every opinion poll shows that it will get creamed this week and it has not won the state after 1985.

So, to return to our original question, what should Sonia and Rahul Gandhi do? I think they should forget about the election and do the right thing. They should ease the divisive current which is damaging Gujarat and provoking violence around the country. Even a decade after the riot in Gujarat, it is still used as the excuse by perpetrators of acts like the bombing of the German Bakery in Pune.

The attackers at the Taj in Mumbai in November 2008 got local support and one of the reasons this came to them was Muslim anger over the riots.

Whether or not one believes this is justified, the fact is that Gujarat, not Kashmir, has become the number one reason for terrorist violence against India.

And the cause is not far to seek. When Modi refuses to accept responsibility for or even the guilt of a minister convicted and sentenced for mass murder, when he stands by ministers just out of jail and accused of violent and hateful acts, he keeps the riots alive.

The Congress should forget about winning the election and make its priority restoring normalcy to that state. The party still gets about 35 per cent of the vote in Gujarat, which would be a very handsome share in any other Indian state. In two-party Gujarat, it has meant being on the losing side.

But it also means that there is more traction for the Congress here than in states like Uttar Pradesh where Rahul Gandhi has spent much time to no apparent benefit. A few months of full-time work in Gujarat, healing and not politics would have served him and the state much better.

Coming here for a couple of days every five years for a rally or two and then wondering why it is that the party doesn’t win is selfish and shameful for the heirs of Nehru and Gandhi.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 9th, 2012.

COMMENTS (32)

Rakib | 11 years ago | Reply

@Manishj: ".....there has not been a single riot that took place in Gujarat after 2002. This means a lot. It says that though Modi has not appologised for 2002, he has ensured that the same does not get repeated which is more important............."

That's the catch, fear is the key. Dare to vote us out & see riots again, that is the implicit threat of BJP-wallahs. However, Modi knows that such stunts can be pulled off only once in a political life-time. One more round of targeted killing & he will be declared a cousin of Slobodan Milošević by UN's international crimes tribunal. Contrary to calculations of BJP, trouble did not spread outside Gujarat & subsequently Hindus solidly stood by Muslims.May be the then PM AB Vajpayee read the riot-act to Modi. Thanks are owed to the unremitting pressure from TV & Press, to sting operation by Tehlka reg Babu Bajrangi & his confession about gory killings, to some public spirited Hindus like Harsh Mander, Teesta Setalvad, Sanjay Bhatt etc, to SIT, to an active Judiciary & to the tenacity of Ahesan Jaffery's widow. The Perpetrators are also shaken by the sheer intensity of global condemnation and relentless media focus. That a decade later we are still discussing this proves it. Modi got away with it for a while due to BJP Govt at Centre & post 911 anti-Muslim atmosphere but Gujarati business instincts are such that they will throw away Modi if he is found to be a liability & riots become frequent. One fallout of this sad event is issue of mosque-temple at Ayodhya, Mathura, Benares will be on back burner. That may prevent more excuses for riots. The costs in terms of lives do not justify the benefits of change in status quo..

Dee Cee | 11 years ago | Reply

Even if Modi brings trillions of dollars, what we need to choose is whether India will remain secular or not. Those talking about "development" to sideline the issue of hate, need to choose between the the idea of India and MoUs signed during Vibrant Gujarat. Simply put, secularism is non-negotiable. Without it, India will break down. Modi is a divisive force, who can rule in a polarized society. His support base among the middle and upper middle class drawing room (as mentioned by @Deep) should do well to remember the similar popularity of soft radicalism in Pakistani upper middle class drawing rooms that has led to the current situation in Pakistan. The price of democracy is eternal vigilance. If we are lured by short term prosperity to forget the unifying soul of India, we might end up with better highways in a fascist state. First they will go after the Muslims, then Communists, then after the Christians, and then the Dalits, after that Feminists, the list may end up at your door step. Modi is just a symptom of the real disease, which is the hate-filled mindset. We cure the symptom by curing the disease. And this disease can be cured only if we speak up, everywhere, even in those drawing rooms at the risk of sounding impolite. Secularism is not a concrete object that will stay with us if we just write it in the constitution once Like love, we have to make it and practice it everyday, so that the mere word translates into thoughts, emotions, and actions. If India loses that and has every riches in the world, it will still be a poor nation, because a nation of hate-filled bigots is destitute of all things that makes us human.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ