Hindu mandir controversy: Despite evidence, military official denies temple demolition

HRCP, Hindu community angered at denial despite president’s notice.


Photo Athar Khan/rabia Ali December 04, 2012

KARACHI:


The Military Estate Office, which assisted a private builder in the demolition of a Hindu temple and houses in Karachi’s Soldier Bazaar, on Saturday continue to deny that the pre-partition house of worship was razed in the operation.


Despite debris lying all over the compound, the president’s notice and the angered Hindu community’s protests, Director of Military Lands and Cantonment Zeenat Ahmed insisted that the Shri Rama Pir Mandir has not been damaged.

“Of what I have been told by my people, the temple is still standing and is untouched,” she said.  The director said that the deities were all in sound condition. “The people who had deities in their homes had deliberately put them in front of the debris of the damaged houses. This was done to present a wrong picture that the temple was destroyed.”

She said that the houses were encroachments and they were removed when a builder approached them to assist him in removing illegal occupants from his land. “The temple was already in a bad condition. The encroachers were asked to vacate the land but when they did not, action was taken against them. But the temple, which was already in bad shape, was not touched.”

Meanwhile, enraged members of the Hindu community said such statements only went further in hurting the sentiments of the minority. A resident of the area, Ashok Kumar, said that it was a joke that the police and some people were denying the demolition of the temple. “Our temple has been damaged but we are getting blamed for staging a drama.”

Sindh Vice Chairperson of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Amarnath Motumal, said that it was condemnable that instead of reaching out to the affected people, the officials were refusing to admit what they had done.

“I have attended several events in the temple. Whether a temple is 30 years old or 100 years old, no one has the right to desecrate it. We will not tolerate this.”

Meanwhile, Ahmed retracted from her statement on Saturday regarding the temple being old grant property, and said that she has no knowledge about the ownership of the temple.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 4th, 2012. 

COMMENTS (78)

VINOD | 11 years ago | Reply

@LionOfPunjab: I totally agree with you. Indian army really cheated and by confusion the brave Pakistan army threw their weapon. I thought I was the only person present there to watch the truth. I am so happy you were also there. Welcome to my gang of truth diggers. One thing you have missed that it was namaz time and the Pakistan army, keeping their weapons aside, had closed there eyes for prayer when these cheats just picked up all the weapons of the brave. Shame on them for picking up 92000 weapons in one sweep. These coward Indians are shameless. I totally agree with you. Please publish these facts and move a motion in UNO for redressal. India must pay 9200000 dollars as compensation other wise they will be severely punished next time. By the way I am out of stock for opium. please send some.

Cynical | 11 years ago | Reply

@jugno

@Cynical

'Babri masjid was built on a temple site by Babar.'

Probably it was. But that is not relevant in context of my post you reffered to. Seems like, I couldn't get the message through. My fault, offcourse.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ