Alerts
 
< >

A PPP-PML-N joint strategy?

Published: July 16, 2012

The truth is that both parties feel threatened by ‘third parties’.

First, there was the NAB flurry about getting the Sharifs cornered in the accountability courts as tit for tat for the savage rhetoric let loose by them against the ‘corrupt’ PPP government. Then, there was the speculation that the two parties might come together in deciding the date of the next election and a political strategy of how to cope with it, given the rising tsunami of Imran Khan. There was also talk of the PML-N getting its perspective right on the judiciary, making it more realistic as the world complained about ‘lack of restraint’ on the part of judges now getting used to firing prime ministers.

A caretaker government as the institution that will conduct the next election headed by a neutral prime minister plus cabinet has always aroused suspicion about the fabled ability of President Asif Ali Zardari to subvert persons and institutions in his party’s favour. It was expected that there will be a battle royale over the issue after the election is announced. Bickering over judges’ appointment between the two parties has already resulted in the transfer of authority of induction to the Chief Justice of Pakistan. Will more bickering denude the parties further of their legitimate powers? This must weigh upon the minds of the politicians on both sides. Will they do something about it?

Speculations started brewing in Islamabad. ‘Credible sources’ said that the ruling PPP and the PML-N were close to ‘working out a deal that would result in both naming a consensus caretaker prime minister and finalisation of a date for election to be held before the end of the year’. Two persons were named, both unlikely: human rights lawyer Asma Jahangir and Pakistan’s UN envoy Abdullah Hussain Haroon. The choice of Ms Jahangir would clearly have been a message to an ‘excessive’ Supreme Court, while Mr Haroon would have been suspect because of his connection to President Zardari. Rumours began to circulate about a joint PML-N-PPP stance vis-à-vis the judiciary in favour of parliamentary supremacy.

Soon enough, the PML-N denied proposing Ms Jahangir or Mr Haroon for the slot of caretaker prime minister and termed the news a baseless rumour. It actually blamed the PPP for floating the story to malign the PML-N in the eyes of its supporters and said that ‘when the time comes to choose caretakers it will consult all the opposition parties including the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’. Alas, last time it did so in the case of Justice (retd) Fakhruddin G Ebrahim as Chief Election Commissioner, it was slightly put off by the 84-year-old’s remark that only two elections had been held fairly in the past and in both cases, the PPP was returned to power. To be fair, he also criticised the PPP’s decision to push through a change of rules of contempt of court through a legislation. People started recommending that maybe Pakistan should follow India and Bangladesh on the rules regarding an election commissioner’s age. The catch here is that if the PPP and the PML-N fail to jointly choose a caretaker government, then Mr Ebrahim will get to appoint one under the 20th Amendment.

Whatever may be the outcome of these speculations, the truth is that both parties feel threatened by ‘third parties’. The judiciary is increasingly relying on its street power and Imran Khan, appearing unmindful of the sensitivities of the PML-N when declaring that parliament was no longer supreme. The Court was possibly leaning on judicial memory of what the PML-N had done to the Sajjad Ali Shah Court. The other growingly threatening factor is the rise of Imran Khan as the leader who beats the ideologues of the PML-N on slogans of change. The ‘wave’ he might create with his radical message behind an ‘Islamic welfare state’ will cut into the vote bank of the PML-N as the PPP shrinks in Punjab.

The threat of Imran Khan as he sallies forth into Waziristan with one lakh supporters should shine some light in the dark corners of the mindset that empowers other institutions and parties by cutting the ground from under the bipartisan system Pakistan has enjoyed for the past 20 years.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 17th, 2012.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Reader Comments (11)

  • Faraz
    Jul 16, 2012 - 10:20PM

    That is the constitution rite of govt. and opposition to discuss the next care taker government.

    Recommend

  • Toticalling
    Jul 16, 2012 - 10:29PM

    It is an improvement whatever the reason for flexibility.
    The smartest man of the 20th century wasn’t Albert Einstein. It was George Santayana, who said something to the effect that those who fail to learn from history are condemned to repeat it.
    I think If two re fighting, they must make sure that a third invisible player does not steal the show. And I do not mean PTI here

    Recommend

  • Falcon
    Jul 16, 2012 - 10:46PM

    Well said. One of the rare insightful editorials I have seen on ET.

    Recommend

  • afzaalkhan
    Jul 17, 2012 - 12:41AM

    The threat of Imran Khan as he sallies forth into Waziristan with one lakh supporters should shine some light in the dark corners of the mindset that empowers other institutions and parties by cutting the ground from under the bipartisan system Pakistan has enjoyed for the past 20 years.

    Would ET care to elaborate which bi-partisan system and where does it exist, no one cut the ground its the corruption of both parties and their old allies that has given rise to Imran Khan. But ET is very happy with corrupt parties anything to save the old guard.

    Recommend

  • usali
    Jul 17, 2012 - 1:26AM

    @faraz Keep in mind that some of the parties did not take part in the elections and deem themselves to be bitter opposition than the one inside the parliament. so if increase the sphere of opposition, i tend to agree with you.

    Recommend

  • adeel ahmed
    Jul 17, 2012 - 9:29AM

    Unfortunately, due to lack of leadership qualities, PML-N last 9 months decision revolve around fear of PTI instead independent decision. Whenever, they sit to decide, they keep PTI in their mind

    Recommend

  • roadkashehzada
    Jul 17, 2012 - 10:49AM

    no need to sensationalise the news.
    if governemnt and opposition wont discuss the caretaker set up and next elections who else will? other parties have delibrately kept themselves out of the political system. i wonder wht magic are they waiting that will rectify all errors in eletoral rolls of by elections and everything will be ok in general election

    Recommend

  • Zia
    Jul 17, 2012 - 11:18AM

    PPP and PMLN, two sides of the same coin!!!

    Recommend

  • Mirza
    Jul 17, 2012 - 8:03PM

    A good pragmatic editorial and advise to the political parties.

    Recommend

  • saad
    Jul 17, 2012 - 8:42PM

    they are scared due to raising popularity of Imran khan

    Recommend

  • Abdullah
    Jul 17, 2012 - 8:50PM

    PML and PPP under the charter of democracy will play in turns looting the country while third PTI party of upcoming looters wait for a Britain like scenario of LibDems

    “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch”

    Secondly

    “as the world complained about ‘lack of restraint’ on the part of judges” seriously? ET by world you mean US? or IHT?

    It is PK internal matter!

    Recommend

More in Editorial