Alerts
 
< >

Pakistan not ‘gouging’ over NATO’s Afghan routes: Khar

Published: June 13, 2012

Foreign minister says Pak-US talks not being thwarted by Pakistan's demand for high tariffs on Nato supplies. PHOTO: PID/FILE

CANBERRA / ISLAMABAD: Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar said on Tuesday difficult talks with the United States to repair frayed ties and re-open Nato supply routes to Afghanistan were not being thwarted by a Pakistani demand for high tariffs on the supplies.      

Pakistan cut the routes for Nato supplies in November last year to protest against the death of 24 Pakistani soldiers killed in cross-border fire from Nato aircraft.

The supply lines for goods shipped in to the Pakistani port of Karachi and trucked in to landlocked Afghanistan have been vital for US-led forces over their more than 10-year involvement in Afghanistan.

Now, the routes are seen as important for the withdrawal of most foreign troops from Afghanistan before the end of 2014.

But talks on getting the routes re-opened have become snagged on a Pakistani demand for a substantial increase in the fees Pakistan charges on the supplies, media has reported.

But Foreign Minister Khar rejected that.

“Pakistan is not in any sort of price-gouging debate right now. So these impressions are indeed incorrect, wrong and must be dispersed as soon as possible,” Khar told reporters.

“The US side knows very well the needs and requirements to enable us to move in that direction, to enable us to take that decision,” she said, referring to re-opening the routes.

She did not elaborate.

The United States has rebuffed Pakistan’s demands for an apology for the air strike in November in which the 24 Pakistani soldiers were killed and ties have become severely strained.

The two sides failed to agree on the tariff and the United States said on Monday it was withdrawing negotiators from Pakistan without securing a deal after six weeks of talks.

NATO still hopes for Pakistan transit agreement

Nato still hopes to reopen transport supply routes to Afghanistan through neighbouring Pakistan despite securing new transit deals with three Central Asian states, Nato Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said.

Rasmussen said the Nato transit agreements with Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan would give Nato forces more flexibility ahead of the planed withdrawal of most foreign combat troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014.

“We want as many options as possible,” Rasmussen told the National Press Club in the Australian capital, Canberra.

“Winding down a very comprehensive mission in Afghanistan is logistically quite a challenge, and to manage that we need as many transit opportunities as possible,” he said.

However, Rasmussen also said officials were hopeful the transit route through Pakistan would be re-opened “in a not too distant future”.

The issue of military supply routes through Pakistan has become a lightning rod for tensions between the United States and Pakistan, adding to Pakistan’s concerns over drone strikes and the US incursion into Pakistan last year in the operation that killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.

US officials have warned that resupplying troops in Afghanistan through the northern, Central Asian route could be up to two-and-a-half times more expensive.

That route could also require cooperation from Russia to ensure access to sea ports, but Rasmussen said Nato already had an agreement with Moscow. He gave few other details.

“We have already a reverse transit agreement with Russia, and the fact that we have now concluded transit arrangements with a number of Central Asian states makes our transit arrangement with Russia even more effective,” Rasmussen said.

He refused to comment on the costs of using northern supply routes, adding the system worked on a commercial basis with transport companies in the transit countries.

Rasmussen is in Australia for talks with Australian Defence Minister Stephen Smith and to sign a Nato-Australia political agreement with Prime Minister Julia Gillard.

Australia, a strong US ally, is the largest non-Nato contributor to Afghanistan, with around 1,500 troops.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Reader Comments (19)

  • Omer
    Jun 13, 2012 - 2:53PM

    You should say sorry to let your hopes materialize.

    Recommend

  • Aryabhat
    Jun 13, 2012 - 4:38PM

    In case of this Transit arrangements, I think GOP is now realisign that they have “missed the train” as they say.

    Emotions, Eog, Pride, Ghairat, may be good for individuals. For nations, it has to be replaced with Pragmatism and Give and Take not just Take Take and Take some more…

    America didn’t ask for Apology for shielding Bin Laden (or at least not detecting him living next to Military Academy for so many years) and they will not offer any on Salala incidence!

    It is harsh but such is life.

    Sooner Pakistan get sense and conclude something before 4th July, better. After that it will be all election time and no one has time for this fish market haggling. And new Obama or Romney will be tougher on Paksitan then what is now.

    So time for Pakistan to be realisitc and allow transit when you still can…..

    Recommend

  • Jun 13, 2012 - 5:01PM

    Still hearing the cries.There were weapon of mass destruction.Commission was appointed by the United Nations to probe the matter.Commission visited Iraq searched stockpile but found no such weapon,as United States and OK alleged.

    Despite of all it was invaded and after bloody war conquered the land checked the stockpile but there was no such weapons as alleged by the two super power.

    War lords understand that Pakistan has adopted a same position or policy.Pakistan has clear cut stance on the supply routs.

    Supply Lines Communications were not closed for increasing in fees,Nato forces ,in fact committed a heinous crime by targeting Pakistan soldiers without any acceptable reason.

    Pakistan seeks apology on that brutal killing.Pakistan has right for that.If United States is really friend of Pakistan it should move forward and offer apology.

    Time is running out.Further delay is not favorable..

    Recommend

  • ammar
    Jun 13, 2012 - 5:16PM

    Dont open supply routes.america cannot complete withdrawal from northern route.bcz 1.it is 3 times for expensive. 2.it will take one month to transport 1 truck as infrastructure is poor. 3.transporters are unwilling to transport bcz this route is frequented by looters.

    if us and nato have concluded an agreement with central asian states then why are they asking pakistan to open supply lines.simply bcz they know that northern route is not viable.agreement with central asian states is just a pressure tactic.

    so pakistan has a great trump card.we have nato and us begging.

    Recommend

  • Shyam
    Jun 13, 2012 - 5:18PM

    “We have already a reverse transit agreement with Russia, and the fact that we have now concluded transit arrangements with a number of Central Asian states makes our transit arrangement with Russia even more effective,” Rasmussen said.”

    So Russia pushes Pakistan to harden its stand while at the same time providing reverse transit services to US and thus making a lot of money plus employment generation. Its all about the money honey

    Recommend

  • abc
    Jun 13, 2012 - 5:27PM

    An apology is must to move forward towards some conclusion. Pakistan paid a very heavy price being part of this so called war. We have nothing to do as there is no defined goal or objectives. US has to leave this place one day. What would happen than who will handle the mess up created over the last 10 years. Pakistan cannot afford another hostile neighbor. Pakistan should facilitate US to leave this place while helping afghans build up their country and a government which has genial relations with us. Pakistan should focus on protecting its borders and economy.

    Recommend

  • sohaib
    Jun 13, 2012 - 5:40PM

    US has made it an issue of ghairat, ego and pride to not apologize and accept Pakistan’s legitimate demand. Those who flog Pakistanis with a ‘ghairat’ flog must now see how their master is behaving.

    Recommend

  • Voice of Gilgit
    Jun 13, 2012 - 6:21PM

    Please don’t raise the issue as high as Rymand Devos cause, we now our limits under these kind of leadership.

    Recommend

  • kasim
    Jun 13, 2012 - 6:26PM

    Learn to say sorry when you bomb allied soldiers America.
    If only you could see how the families of these lost soldiers weep.

    Recommend

  • Haq Nawaz
    Jun 13, 2012 - 6:58PM

    @Aryabhat: Thanks for your advice. We in Pak weren’t born yesterday. We don’t have to cooperate with the US if this is not in our national interest. NATO has concluded transit agreements with Russia and Central Asian states. Good luck to them in withdrawal from Afghanistan. Recommend

  • Jun 13, 2012 - 7:37PM

    Offering money for opening ground routs,
    but no apology on killing 24 soldiers and
    those innocents,women and children lost
    their lives in the drone attack

    American approach regarding Pakistan not
    understandable and acceptable as well.

    Recommend

  • The Truth
    Jun 13, 2012 - 8:54PM

    @Aryabhat Well said. Sadly the nay say-rs on here will talk about national interest without actually understanding what that means. These tend to be the same people who complain about the Govt raising gas prices or load shedding but yet they wont pay their electric bill or realize that the Pak govt buys oil on the international market. Apologies, egos and respect don’t pay the bills. Commerce, trade, domestic production and a skilled, educated work force make a nation successful. Religion is fine, but in Pak its become a crutch to avoid personal responsibility. An excuse to do nothing ourselves and say well its God’s will. God helps those who help themselves.

    Recommend

  • Jun 13, 2012 - 8:57PM

    Tribal belt bordering Afghanistan and Salala outpost,
    how much distance in between,remarkable distance
    as map reveals.

    Why they understood hill trench extremists haven and
    blindly attacked, resulting in two dozen martyred,it was
    a great national lose.

    Mistakenly or deliberately? commission must be constituted,
    ground realty and circumstantial evidence crying loudly not mistakenly.

    Admitting the fact,be brought responsible to justice,be paid compensation
    to the bereaved families.

    Recommend

  • Jun 13, 2012 - 9:49PM

    Gone,in the very short span of time came back,
    according to them negotiating process is still underway.

    Coming and going,what they doing?should say and pay,
    that is essential part of the solution.Other all efforts ,are
    time wasting practices.

    Recommend

  • Jun 13, 2012 - 11:13PM

    Pakistan cut the routes for Nato supplies in November last year to protest against the death of 24 Pakistani soldiers killed in cross-border fire from Nato aircraft.

    The above mentioned version is wrongly stated,not cross border fire,soldiers on Slalala out post were targeted. It was tragic incident,Pakistan protested and as a protest closed ground lines supply routs to Afghanistan

    Recommend

  • Saleem AHMED SHERAZI
    Jun 13, 2012 - 11:14PM

    America is not our friend. The NATO supply will not be reopened unless they respect our
    parliament’s resolution including cessation of unlawful drones strikes.

    Recommend

  • Dr. Syed R. Ali
    Jun 14, 2012 - 12:35AM

    If NATO has their escape routes planned out, I don’t see why they are pressuring Pakistan to open its routes to them. NATO can use magic carpets to evacuate for all I care.

    U.S. must apologize.

    Recommend

  • Imran Con
    Jun 14, 2012 - 1:42AM

    “Price gouging is a pejorative term referring to a situation in which a seller prices goods or commodities much higher than is considered reasonable or fair.”
    Yes, you are “gouging.”
    @ammar:
    Incorrect. It’s more expensive and people world like cheaper but Pakistan already has its fill of extorting. At least with aid it can look all pretty and nice in the media. With a supply route, you’re just further pushing the enemy image.

    Recommend

  • neil
    Jun 14, 2012 - 2:24AM

    Pakistan’s problem is they assume they are a. Power and an important country ,forget the nukes and supply route for a minute …. what do u produce or contribute? Zero u guys can’t even sustain urself without us aid and u talk abt ghairat? What a joke

    Recommend

More in Pakistan