Why this must be resolved is surely because it is the most senseless and futile conflict currently taking place in this conflict-ridden world, with two sides fighting over an uninhabited area, a killing ice field that has claimed thousands of lives of each side’s troops. Apparently, neither India nor Pakistan ever publicly release their respective loss of lives, a loss which the experts put at almost 4,000 troops since — ludicrously — 1984 when it became one more bone of contention over which the two neighbours ceaselessly scrap, spending millions (or is it billions?) of rupees each day stupidly facing off against each other.
There is a solution which could be arrived at if both sides were to put aside their stubbornness and stupidity and see sense over this no-man’s land where international borders have not been defined by the UN-sponsored 1948 ceasefire that ended the first of the wars waged by the two countries that seemingly have no concept of what is good for their people.
Over the years, sensible men have held their heads in their hands bemoaning the sheer absurdity of the Siachen conflict. Now that this latest tragedy has struck, perhaps the matter will again be raised. The concept of a Peace Park at Siachen was first put forward by the Indian environmentalist and mountaineer, Aamir Ali in 1994, when mountaineers from India and Pakistan met in Switzerland to mobilise support for the park.
In 2008, Indian and Pakistani glaciologists established a detailed plan for research partnerships that could facilitate the establishment of the park and in 2009, representatives of both countries met in Norway to discuss the matter. Naturally, the discussion turned towards the intense pollution — human waste, medical waste, guns, arms and ammunition, shells, fuel containers and so forth — in the area. Now, uncountable tonnes of garbage are dumped into crevasses, which eventually flow into the water supply upon which millions of Pakistanis depend. Also discussed were the glacial melt from global warming and the military competition hastening the glacier’s demise. Glacial ice is routinely cut and melted and both sides use chemicals — Siachen, apart from being the world’s largest, is also its fastest retreating glacier. Not an environmental situation to be devoutly wished for.
Reportedly, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, at one time, expressed hope that the region would become a “peace mountain”. Also reportedly, Siachen was discussed at the brief meeting held between Mr Singh and the president of Pakistan in New Delhi on April 9 — but probably not in the context of a peace park. Standing in the way are the politicians and the armies of both sides.
In our national press, dateline Karachi April 8, was a news item under the headline “Plea to turn Siachen into peace park”. The item reported that a body known as the Pakistan Peace Coalition has seen sense on the matter. But who will join hands with this organisation? The world has 170 such parks — let this wasteful and destructive stand-off over a stretch of wasteland, the possession of which cannot benefit the people of either country, cease. The Siachen ecosystem recognises no national borders.
Stephen Cohen of Brookings wrote on the Siachen conflict in the Wall Street Journal of 1999: “[It] might be thought of as just another low intensity border war — were it not being fought between the world’s two newest nuclear powers. This combat over a barren, uninhabited nether world of questionable strategic value is a forbidding symbol of their lingering irreconcilability. [It is like] a struggle of two bald men over a comb ... the epitome of the worst aspects of their relationship.”
Published in The Express Tribune, April 14th, 2012.
COMMENTS (26)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Amina Jilani
Madam,
Far as I can make out, India has favoured demilitarisation of the Siachen glacier after signing an AGPL.
Chances are, in the absence of the AGPL the contending parties may be tempted to establish new bases and that may lead to fresh hostilities.The AGPL would prevent a repeat of Kargil, and to that extent makes eminent sense.
Pakistan needs to realise this and act.
Sooner the better.
You can bet it is billions, Madam, because the troops require very special and very expensive material to keep them there.
I agree. This must be the most futile war on earth.
@Hindi hain hum...: Your revenue argument is unhelpful to say the least. Rude is another adjective that is just as apt.
@kris: The lady was trying to answer the question before you asked it. The entire article provides multiple answers to the "why". I do agree that this kind of park (highly desirable in all respects) can only come about with the establishment of trust and more importantly with a genuine meeting of minds and interests between the Indian and Pakistani states. However, it is an idea worth striving for.
@Shafaq: Who had occupied Kashmir first? Pakistan is universally recognized as the invader and the Indian action was a response to the same. Please get your facts right.
Who has been violating UNSC resolutions on Kashmir since 1947? Both Parties. Pakistan, by annexing parts of the province and ceding Aksai Chin and not withdrawing. India by enforcing the instrument of accession and not withdrawing either. Since both parties to the dispute are in violation and since much water and sewage have flowed down the Jhelum, the resolution is a dead duck.
Who was afraid of holding plebiscite after rushing to United Nations? Isn’t it India? Come on, at least accept some basic historical facts. Politics is the art of compromise and India forged a compromise with the legitimate representative of the Kashmiri people. Pakistan spurned both the (widely despised) Maharaja and the (widely admired and loved) Sheikh sahab. The plebiscite is another dead duck. Move on.
By the way, I am a Kashmiri from the valley and I definitely know what I am talking about. Please leave your cocoon.
The idea of advice seems very good but Pakistan has failed to sustain itself as a stable secular democracy. Who will listen to you???? That too after eliminating all the minorities. Now we are talking of far more serious issues about an entire nation that can run properly --the author is too naive to talk of just Siachen
If you want to make Peace Park then why only Indian territory. I would suggest select pakistani territory of same size which is adjacent to siachin and then whole area as peace park. :)
@kris This is the belligerent attitude of Indian nation.
Why should India compromise on anything when it has everything? Use common sense while proposing ("Peace" mountain with a violent neighbor who uses terrorists as a state policy. How absurd?) Pakistan has not realized ground realities. It continues to live in its own world full of conspiracies, absurd theories, fantasies, except practicality and reality. After Kargil and 26/11, India will never trust Pakistan and will not leave Siachen whatever may be the cost.
@Hindi hain hum Who had occupied Kashmir first? Who has been violating UNSC resolutions on Kashmir since 1947? Who was afraid of holding plebiscite after rushing to United Nations? Isn't it India? Come on, at least accept some basic historical facts.
People will always say publicly that they want conflicts to end and if an occurrence makes a good headline, it increases. But, when has it ever really changed it? It usually doesn't. That's because the ones who decided to start it already knew deaths would happen and made the judgment that it was worth it. The ones having the final say would probably only offer generic sympathies as deaths occurring is not a surprise that's going to open their eyes. It's only surprising and eye opening to the public. Using the rough estimate, if 3865 deaths weren't enough, what's 135 more to them?
@saleem khan: I agree 100% that both India and Pakistan should come up with a Joint International Venture of a grand Skiing Resort/ Winter Theme Park . I assure you it will bring tremendous revenues for the two countries.
Hmm... good idea. A better idea though would be for India to come up with a Joint India Venture of skiing resort/winter theme park in Indian territory. It will bring tremendous revenues that India can keep. It would also mean lesser terrorist financing.
I agree 100% that both India and Pakistan should come up with a Joint International Venture of a grand Skiing Resort/ Winter Theme Park . I assure you it will bring tremendous revenues for the two countries.
Why peace-park only in Siachen ? Siachen is just a small part of Kashmir. How about peace park, all over Kashmir, with current AGLP as the basis. Or do you want a peace park only on the territory you dont currently control ?
@Rajendraa kolkadhe North pole or Antartica and siachen are same????? man what to say.
Amazing, how all the Pakistani analysts want to make Indian occupied glacier as the peace park. If you are so keen on the idea, why not start by converting Pakistan occupied Kashmir as a peace park first. Unless you are lobbyng for that idea, this is all hypocritical nonsense.
Since Pakistan is so enamored with the Peace Park idea, when is it signing the AGPL agreement. The peace park can then quickly be realized. Peace Park proponents who don't also argue for AGPL to be recognized are hypocrites.
One of the most sensible Op Eds, thanks. We have to demilitarize the area like before and it would be a good start. We don't have to own the ballpark to enjoy the game, in this case the beuty and fury of the nature.
Good call...I specially liked Stepehen Cohen's example of bald men fighting over a comb...
Let sanity prevail !
Our war lords will never realize this, unfortunately!!!
Very good and thought-provoking article. The issue of Siachin needs proper attention, it is a political issue and let this issue be resolved by politicians.
Author appears to be naive about how world politics works. How can India or for that matter Pakistan give up claim to Siachen when many countries are putting claims to North pole? Russians have claimed the North Pole by planting their flag at the seabed there. Chinese have also joined the race. Americans seem to own the Moon and Mars. Will Nepal give up Mount Everest? Bottom line is that there is no trust between India and Pakistan and all this will continue.
Bravo Ms. Jilani for highlighting the peace park idea which many of us have been moving forward since the pioneering work of Aamir Ali. Even at 90+ he keeps the momentum through emails from Geneva and deserves the highest praise indeed. I just spoke to him a few months back and he is indeed inspirational. There are some very specific steps which have been suggested to operationalize the peace park idea which we should try to support. Note some of these in my recent article for National Geographic as well which provides detailed links to studies and efforts undertaken worldwide on this initiiative: http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2012/04/07/siachen-glacier/