Speaking against drone strikes: Pakistani lawyer denied US visa
Akbar was invited to speak at the summit as he had been providing legal aid to the victims of drone strikes in Pakistan and was the first one to file a case on behalf of the family members of civilian victims of drone strikes. He is also the co-founder of a human rights organisation called Foundation for Fundamental Rights.
According to the press release, Akbar has travelled to the US several times in the past, but has not been allowed to visit the country since he started speaking against the US drone strikes.
“Denying a visa to people like me is denying Americans their right to know what the US government and its intelligence community are doing to children, women and other civilians in this part of the world,” Akbar said.
The organisers of the event CODEPINK, have also expressed displeasure over the US government’s decision to not allow Akbar to speak at the forum terming it as “outrageous”.
Earlier, a report found out that at least 194 people were killed in the 10 of the deadliest drone strikes in tribal areas. Of these, at least 70 per cent, 138 deaths, were of militants. The rest, 56 deaths, were of either civilians or tribal police.
COMMENTS (30)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1736927836-0/hugh-sutton-(1)1736927836-0-405x300.webp "article")
1736926952-0/Untitled-design-(91)1736926952-0-165x106.webp "article")
1736926441-0/BeFunky-collage-(49)1736926441-0-165x106.webp "article")
1736924527-0/sidra--(3)1736924527-0-270x192.webp "us sanctions two indian firms for aiding russia s arctic lng 2 project")
1736922471-0/sidra--(2)1736922471-0-270x192.webp "gamersnexus leads class action against paypal over honey affiliate claims")
The United States of Aggression? Assassination? you decide. Call it ObamaKill
@Kirsten: It hasn't been issued for previous attempts to visit as well, which equates to a denial. If you are going to criticize the journalism, you should at least educate yourself on the topic first.
Yes, everyone just keep your head in the sand while those who do not represent the interests of the American people continue to carry out illegal wars in our name. This anti-Americanism that you talk about is felt by a good portion of the world, and there is a reason for this. Our politicians throughout history felt it was in their best interest to intervene in the politics of foreign regions on the sole behalf of their wealthy allies, plain and simple. We have a military larger than the next 14 countries combined, and yet we still continue to hear the endless slogan reiterated by our commander and chiefs: "Don' tread on me"; we still continue to hear on how these "preemptive" wars, conducted without Congressional approval, are in the interests of national security; that having our military might occupying a foreign region is a means to keep us safer here at home. Let's see: our government lied to us about the casualty rate of American soldiers in Vietnam and sought to cover up the illegal bombings of Laos and Cambodia; our CIA has been forced by the "Freedom of Information Act" to declassify documents that reveal their involvement in the overthrow of popularly elected regimes- Iranian Coup of 1953, the overthrow of Allende in Chile, and their assistance to help seat Saddam Hussein. It's time to give up this notion of "Hear no evil, See no evil" and call a spade when it's a spade. America is a great nation, but it's great because there is a limit placed on Government, which allows for freedom and prosperity for the citizenry. However, this won't last very long if the people continue to ignore history and refuse to hold their government accountable for its actions, you know, since they indirectly represent the American people.
@Sajjad Ahmed: Dear Sajjad Ahmed, You easily satisfied. It is because of people like you that arrogant ego driven personnel in authority get away with making dreadful decisions, which are totally unnecessary. There is absolutely no valid reason why Shahzad Akbar, the Pakistan lawyer, should not be allowed to visit America to attend a conference. On the contrary, he has not committed any crime and is providing Stirling service to innocent Pakistan people who have been the victims of bombing raids by a supposedly friendly power. Additionally, if the Americans are not doing anything wrong and they are attempting to help Pakistanis what is their problem? I have no doubt that Shahzad Akbar, as a lawyer, is making statements which could be construed as criticism on a professional level, but I fail to see why he should be barred from America.
I am quite satisfied with the decision of American embassy regarding issuance of vise to Akber. If I were visa officer I would take the same or even more harsh decision and recommend forever no entry to Akbar in US. Why are we taking aid from US & then we talk against the US. I strongly appreciate decision of US embassy
@Shyam: Your argument is invalid, just Google "Wikileaks video of US military killing journalists in Iraq" & "U.S. Congressman Witnessed European Special Forces Beheading Libyans".
He was not denied a visa. The visa has not yet been issued. That is not the same as being denied. It's still possible (although probably unlikely) that the visa will be issued before the date of the conference. This is basic journalism. Check your facts before you publish.
@Harry Stone: Dear Harry, If these extreme right wing American thugs would stop murdering innocent people Shahzad Akbar, the Pakistani lawyer, would not be requesting a visa to attend the International Drone Summit. Obviously, Washington does not want Americans to hear the truth, but then this is nothing new. We are getting used to the idea of Washington riding rough-shod over people whenever they think they can get away with it. Having said that some caring people do not have to like it. You obviously do.
How many Americans would be issued with Pakistani visas to come and bash Pakistan on a forum ? get real people ... U.S. is a country and have the right to give or reject the visa ... it is we Pakistanis who issue "mass" visas to Amreeki agents in Dubai consulate !!!! beggars can never be choosers ... wake and smell the coffee ...
Serves him right! Will Pakistan allow somebody who comes here to criticize ISI & Pakistan Army.
Quite a number of silly comments here. But that is too be expected in a country that is so polarized that it has lost the ability to define between what is right and what is wrong.
For all those criticizing Mr Akbar, please realize that he was invited to attend a conference. He is not going there on his own to 'spit venom' against US. And how does criticizing US foreign policy equate to spitting venom against US in the first place? And please stop bringing in Jihadis and Mumtaz Qadri in to the discussion here....Mr Akbar is a lawyer and he filled a case supporting the victims of drone attacks...that has got nothing to do with what Mumtaz qadri did or what any other lawyer did or did not do...
USA knows that drones are killing children and innocent people but they do not want their own citizens to know about their wrong doings and barbaric killings of the innocent
@Moise, Sky etc
The lawyer has freedom of speech. US has not threatened/assasinated him nor issued a Fatwa against him. The lawyer's "Freedom of Speech" is intact BUT he does not have "FREEDOM TO ENTER US SOIL". The lawyer is free to say whatever he wants within Pakistan.
Now was that very hard to understand
I think the USA has done what right to deny a visa. They don't need someone from Pakistan to spread anti American venom on American soil. It's not in their national interest.
More civilians are killed in aerial bombardment by Pakistan jets beside loss of property than the drones which have eliminated major terrorists and few civilians got killed. However, no eminent lawyer took up their case with the concerned establishment and also the terrorists organisations who have killed thousands of innocent people. Infact the lawyers by supporting Qadir a cold blooded killer and showering petals on him has tarnished the image of their whole community are now detested world wide.
There are some stupid comments in here. If someone is anti drone, does it also mean he/she is anti US? One can be against US government policy of using drones because it is killing civilians. Am I to understand if I am against a certain US policy I am a terrorist and I will not be given a US visa? Either don't call yourself champions of free speech or act like one.
@Basit: Just providing analogy doesn't make you right. Rape victims do not rape themselves. So in that matter Pakistan is not a rape victim here. The drone attacks are result for Pakistan's incapability and unwillingness to clean up it's own house. If you have cancer in your gut then your stomach has to be cut open to remove the cancer. That is the collateral damage. And nobody likes Collateral Damage, not the Doctor who operates and certainly not the patient. That's an analogy for you if you understand.
Upholder of free speech and human rights, hilarious.
Freedom of speech? Anyone...
Of course the world class optics of US drones can pinpoint exactly that their targets are terrorists but they cannot pinpoint that their targets are Pakistan Army posts. Yes, very believable.
@Bombay dude: It's like you're asking that a rape victim should worry about the rights of the rapist rather than the rights of the rapist's victims. Please wake up.
Why do you think Visa exist? Pakistan wants to monitor very carefully which Americans get a visa to Pakistan. Why should Americans not do the same? Specifically why should they allow a person with known anti-American tendencies the chance to come to their country?
He's not the only one complaining. It's probably closer to ignoring him to spite Pakistani policies on US citizens.
Why should Americans issue visa to someone who goes there to preach anti-Americanism under the guise of freedom of speech?
Not many Americans pay a lot of attention to CRR. It is an extreme left wing organization well outside of the American main stream of public opinion.
And why would America allow anyone into it nation. The comments seem to indicate there is some type of universal right of access. This is why nations have visa requirements. It is the same for PAK and America as it is for any other nation.
But I do find it funny to read PAK comments about individual freedoms
I do not see any such enthusiasm from Pakistani lawyer against terrorists who have killed more of it's citizens then the drone. That is quite understandable, because people only try to preach someone who is capable to listen, in Pakistan these lawyers will be dead for picking up any cause against terrorists. Does these lawyers take as much effort to check the plight of women, children, old and helpless people who die daily in hands of extremists ? Do these lawyers take up cause for Mumbai train bombing where a coward placed a bomb in a packed mumbai local train in ladies compartment. Just google up the picture of what happened to the compartment where bomb was placed and imagine if thats the condition of a steel made coach, what would have happened to those humans ? why does Pakistani or any Islamic country lawyer does not speak against any case of terrorism or Jihadi ideas which leads to terrorism ? I am not a big fan of drone, but when you stop respecting human lives , your life will not be valued as much as any other human. Simple as that.
well if he is denied the visa again then he should speak to conferenlce via video link and inform the Americns anyway.Too bad the guardians of free speech are denying the free speech to those who don't agree with their point of view.
real face of American democracy & freedom of speech
i really hope mr akbar gets the visa.. it's important that people learn about the drone strikes and start a debate