PM says there is no need for him to resign as, if convicted, he shouldn't even be a member of the parliament. PHOTO: AFP/FILE
ISLAMABAD: As the government-judiciary conflict heads towards a potential showdown, Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani is adamant not to leave office as the premier who resigned.
“There’s no need to step down. If I’m convicted [of contempt of court], then I’m not supposed to be a member of the parliament,” Gilani said in a wide-ranging interview with Al Jazeera television, which was broadcast on Saturday.
The prime minister was responding to a question on whether he would resign for the sake of President Asif Ali Zardari, whose riches from alleged corruption are at the centre of the matter. Gilani, through his counsel Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan, is pleading that he is not in contempt of court for failing to comply with the Supreme Court’s orders to write a letter to Swiss authorities in the National Reconciliation Ordinance case.
“There had been a lot of cases against him, and they were all politically motivated,” Gilani said, referring to Zardari. “He has got immunity. And he has not got immunity only in Pakistan, he has transnational immunity, even all over the world.”
Gilani is due to appear before the court on February 13 to hear whether he is found guilty of contempt.
Speaking about his relations with the army, the prime minister said that he had “good relations” with the military “at the moment”. That has not been the case recently, as Gilani made a statement in China that was perceived as criticism of the military, prompting the Pakistan Army to issue a stern response and even ask the prime minister to “apologise”, according to some reports.
Drone strikes
The prime minister categorically stated that authorities in Islamabad have never approved US drone strikes. “I want to inform you that we did not allow or give permission to fly drones from Pakistan, he said. “Number two, drones are counterproductive. And we had discussed thoroughly with the US administration that we at times make a lot of efforts to very successfully isolate militants from the local tribes.”
Drone attacks generate a negative reaction, he said, with tribesmen in areas bordering Afghanistan. “Then the local tribes and the militants, they get united again,” he said. “They make our jobs extremely difficult. Then there is less political space for us.”
Neighbour relations
Pakistan, Gilani said, backed any Afghan-led plan to establish peace in the neighbouring country and in no way supported Taliban insurgents.
“We are not supporting them. It’s not our job. Why should we support them?”
Gilani also said that regional rivals India and Pakistan could not afford more conflict and were ready to discuss the issues that have long hampered the normalisation of bilateral relations.
“We have agreed to discuss all our core issues, including the issue of Kashmir,” he said.
CORRECTION: An earlier version of the story quoted the prime minister as saying that he will step down if convicted. However, he had said that he will not need to step down as he will automatically lose the premiership if held in contempt of court. The error is regretted.
More in Pakistan
Exchange Of Fire: Five killed in FR Peshawar clash
Perhaps we will not need you to voluntarily ‘step down’. Once convicted, you will be forced to ‘step down’…
Recommend
Wise statament
Recommend
PM Gilani is showing the ‘Sportsman Spirit’ even before the umpire gives his decision.
In case if PM Gilinai is indicted in the Swiss Case, the Supreme Court will not only ask him to resign from Premiership, but will also disqualify him from being member of the National Assembly.
Recommend
Thats called LEADERS, we all are with you.
Recommend
If he really sticks to his decision will be good for the country as well for PP. Sacrfice always results in favourable sentiments. Elections are on the door and PP can get tremendous boost due to it. So Mr PM if you are convicted please go ahead with resignation and set an honorable but entirely different example.
Recommend
Thank you.Recommend
Gilani proved more loyal than the other party members He has truly proved that he is a leader not an opportunist. Recommend
I hope you will be true to your words this time Mr. Gillani.
Recommend
If SC awards punishment and PM sticks to his words! it will be an unprecedented, most appopriate and exemplary action in the history of our nation. It should shut the mouths that undermind the creditability of the politicians but I am sure these mouths will bring new absurd stories matching their interests.
It will be a brave dicision & action and victory of morals, ethical values, the spirit of democracy and rule of a law. There is a lot of talk about “Political Shadat” whcih is rubish and big source of earning (hefty wealths) for the anchers & media persons and a hollow slogan of shallow ploiticians.
Mr. Gilani if you do what are you saying it will uplohd the values of dignity, respect and honour for which you will be respected by the independent honest ones and of cources be remebered in the golden words by the historians.
Peshawary
Recommend
There are ten things I hate about “this” democracy. First, all the citizens are not equal in the eyes of law and the members of religious majority are more equal than those of the minorities. Two, the law and the Constitution encourage discrimination of the basis of religious faith. Three, the entire system is based on hereditary politics, dynastic leadership and monarchic styles. Four, there is a blatant contempt of law and the courts, including the apex court. Five, there are stories of loot and plunder of unprecedented proportion but there is no accountability. Six, elections are not transparent and are held on the basis of corrupted electoral lists. Seven, the common man has no power to “throw out”. Eight, there are different sets of law for the people, the custodians of democracy, and the political elite. Nine, there are endless exemptions and immunities to the elite against payment of taxes, prosecution and accountability. Ten, in spite of all this, they use the name of democracy to seek protection of their rule. Recommend
Ya, as we believe what you say :)
Recommend
Prime Minister Gilani can exhaust all the legal procedures before his conviction is final. It could take months if not years. Meanwhile he stays in office until the next general elections in 2013. If his party loses, he will have to step down anyway.
Recommend
Thank you Mr. PM……please do so…..also kindly stay in Pakistan after stepping down so that the people can make you accountable for the loot and plunder under your nose over the last 4 years….
Recommend
Finally some sensible statement fro our primeminister
Recommend
@Ben:
So true and aptly summarized, but who cares.
Recommend
@Hataf: He has proven his loyalty to his party no doubt. His loyalty to the country is another question!
Although Zardari might just use his Presidential powers to pardon any conviction against Gilani. So as far as the common Pakistani goes, the grind will go on.
Recommend
His party will cry – “Siyasi Shaheed”!
Recommend
Gilani has shown that he is more loyal to Pakistan than many a general or politician. Spoken like a gentleman who respects the constitution and rule of law.
Recommend
I admire his spin & guts which is a rare commodity in the political class
Recommend
One has to be loyal to constitution! He was never loyal to country. If he was memo would not have happens. Haj corruption would not have happened! Billions of dollars would not have been drained in corruption.
If he really wants to regain some respect he should stop his sons from taking over his place! Pakistan is not a kingdom. Even dictators don’t do that: we won’t accept his son to take over who punches people in the face
Go on supreme court we are with you! Please after wards indict him for his genuine crimes such as hajj corruption, OGCL case, PIA and steel meek corruption and many more! He is clearly behind it by making his friends from jail heads of those companies!
If he was loyal he should simply wrote the letter rather than run away for the sake of election!Recommend
Sometimes, I just feel sorry for this guy.
Recommend
What is more important? Loyal to the country or loyal to the party?
If he was loyal to the country as his cheerleaders keep chanting, then he should have resigned already.
Recommend
Some comments are true indication of our failure. One statement turns him into a great leader. They have forgotten what he has done to our dear country in his tenure. The most worrying thing is that these comments are from educated and so called intellectuals.Recommend
Peoples Part proved that it over all believes in the supermacy of law, yes they have made blunders in implementing SC orders but given Pakistan’s culture of politics and how cases are made. I stand with PPP on this for offering the head of PM
Recommend
Very sad many peoples are calling a person leader, one who being head of a country defying its own constitution,He is not obeying the orders of SC and trying to become more loyal to shah than shah.He is ready to sacrifice his PM postRecommend
“Presidential Immunity” Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Lets ask Mubarak about “Presidential Immunity”.
Hey Gaddafi, how’s your “Presidential Immunity”?
What about Saddam Hussein? Why did the USA not respect his “Presidential Immunity”?
Or Noriega’s “Presidential Immunity”?
<Recommend
Historically, judiciary in pakistan has always done the biding of military establishment. Therefore, it is no surprise that PM Gillani is going to be indicted tomorrow. The judiciary had already made the mind and paid no heed to the arguments presented in defence of PM. Its is high time that the judiciary be publicly lambasted for its biased decisions against elected governments, particularly Pakistan Peoples Party.
Recommend
The judiciary which hanged an elected prime minister on the directives of the military, will not feel any hesitation in indicting an elected prime Minister. Recommend
@Rashid:
Really?? Four years of loot, plundering, corruption, mismanagement, etc. and you are calling them “leaders”. Recommend
We did not wish to have the judges who only guarded the interests of the military Generals. But we wanted the Judges who upheld the constitution and worked for the interest of people at large. I feel ashamed to have such a military in the cover of an independent judiciary….disappointed with chaudhary and his team.
Recommend
These are not just allegations. The Swiss Courts had also indicted him for money laundering.
Recommend
@ Haseeb:
what about the Generals who dismantled the constitution beyond recognition and go Scot-free? Shouldn’t supreme court hold them accountable??
Recommend
The dilemma facing PPP leaders as always is: Damned if you do it, damned if you don’t.
That’s a reflection on the sense of “unfairness” that transcends our Pakistani society esp. The so-called “civil society”. I have yet to figure out whats so civil about their thought processes. Even if he accepts the decision and bows out gracefully, some of the biggest talking heads on the news channels will find “creative” ways of incessantly disgracing the by then ex-PM.
Recommend
He said “If convicted” NOT “charged.”There is HUGE difference between the two.
Does ET not make distinction between “being charged” and “being convited?”
Recommend
@Maroof:
Two wrongs don’t make a right. If anyone is doing corruption should not allow them to do it too.
Recommend
@Simply Sane:
As the head of the government he should have written the letter to swiss authorities. This would have helped Pakistan in combating corruption.
Recommend
@Tas:
The SC is putting every effort to combat corruption. The main problem faced by a common man.
Recommend
@ A:
But accountability must be carried out across the board.Recommend
@ A:
What if constitution grants immunity to the sitting president?
Zardari was in jail for whole 11 years during the all mighty government of musharaf. could a single case be established against him? Writing a letter wont do wonders in curbing corruption in pakistan.
Recommend
@Maroof:
The Swiss courts (an independent authority) has charged Zardari in money loundary case.
How can anyone support an ordinance(NRO) passed by a dictator. If the governement is truly democratic then they should write the letter.
Recommend
@Maroof:
Constitution does not grant immunity in civil cases. and this is cases is in civil nature.
Recommend
@ A:
Should not we honour the constitution that grants immunity to the office of president? A letter will be written when zardari does not remain the president. NRO must not be supported at all. Government is already implementing the NRO verdict of the SC barring clause relating to Zardari.
Recommend
@A:
Very respectfully: you missed my point, which is even after he has been punished for committing the ‘sin’ you pointed out, they will not acknowledge anything and will continue to condemn him. You just confirmed my point. Thank you.
Recommend
@Simply Sane:
People would have acknowledge if the government has written the letter to swiss authorities. This would have shown rule of the law and true implementation of the SC’s verdict.
Recommend
Lot of confusion has been created by mincing words and try to make the same ludicurious
Best course would and is to follow the rules.If government does not follow what does it want to do??Who does not know what is happening daily under the garb of various posts held??No one seems to be afraid and are on the neck of the poor masses?? Let rules be followed and PM is on his own choice opting for the Final, knowingly what he is doing.Pray for thre best
Recommend
He should have been dismissed ages ago but better late than never.
Recommend
If he gets what he deserves to get, it will be a momentous day for Pakistan
Recommend
@A:
Let’s get out of the “should have would have” mode. Where do we go from here. That is the question. We should know how to frame an argument. He’s finally doing the right thing by saying he will accept the punishment. How much blaming and how much punishment is enogh? We have to stop somewhere. Too much vindictiveness will make the accuser lose any appearance of being reasonable.
Recommend
Great leader? Is interview with al jaz he couldnt put a sentance together and blatently avoiding toanwer about zardari he was corrupt or not pathetic
Recommend
He said “if convicted” not if charged; huge difference not just semantics.
Recommend
After this case is over one way or the other and Memogate taking its last breaths, what else does PCO SC have against the elected govt? All these unelected generals and judges keep getting extensions after extensions and think it is their right to rule, not the people’s mandate. No wonder there is so much hatred toward democracy perpetuated by the mullah/military/judiciary alliance. Currently three chief justices of various HC and full SC is busy only in cases against the govt. The other cases are all have no importance. Just like the restoration of CJ has solved all the problems of poor Pakistanis, the removal of PM would take care of all the problems of poor citizens.
Recommend
He should step down, because if he does it without any influence from external threat- if he is indicted then he would be dismissed from his job and then you all know Zardari will bring him back…but if he steps down at his own will then he might never go back on to that position again
Recommend
We are waiting for this great time When u leave Office & when that Zardari is GONE
Recommend
As now you have been convicted with contempt of court.Now resign from Premiership voluntarily and make/declare yourself democratic/political hero and martyr before the nation and try to regain the soft corner once again in the nation’s heart instead of appealing in the Supreme Court against the conviction orders.
Recommend