Police arrest 11 suspects over Hindu killing

No Suprised that there are no comments here. Certain People only like to highlight the negativity and just put any positive step into a black hole. and those certain people here exist in quite numbers

Recommend

Well, after couple of months or so all the people who were rounded up would be released saying that they lacked evidence. Didn’t we see how Abdul Aziz was acquitted by the judges in the Lal Masjid case ?

Recommend

@Insane:
True, very true. Unfortunately! Plus they’ll be treated like heroes in courts and jail. Few months n they’ll be out.

Recommend

@zalim singh:
This is called the “WILL” to do something when a Govt. really wants to apprehend the real criminals. Not like the Travesty of Justice of your Court in Gujarat after the Massacre of 2000 Muslims, not a sigle person was blamed and punished. I am talking about the REAL CULPRIT i.e. Narendra Modi. This man is still holding an Important Public office and is the CM of Gujarat. OR Advani who led the Babri Masjid’s terrorist Mob to destroy a centuries old Prayer place. He is the leader of the second largest Indian mainstream Party. And Now look at Sindh Govt. They captured 11 out of 15 criminals apprehended after 24 hours. This is how you can do something if there is a WILL.Recommend

@Sao Lao:
Let us see if they are convicted.

Recommend

@Jahanzeb Khan: still mr.modi’s party winning elections in the areas where muslims population is higher.Recommend

@Jahanzeb Khan:
Get your facts right. There is enough evidence (in stone) that Babri Masjid, as is the case with the Mosque in Mathura and the Qutub complex in Delhi were all built after destroying Hindu and Dharmic sites. In addition, Babri Masjid was not being used by Musims for prayer since the mid-1940s. Up to 1940 it was known as Masjid-i-Janmasthan but the Muslim co-adminstrators of the property strategically changed its name to Babri Masjid to disassociate it from the words Ramkot and “Janmasthan”.

According to the British-rule archives of Faizabad, in 1855, both Hindus and Muslims worshipped in the same building but a couple of years later Muslims barred the Hindus from entering the compound. As yourself: first, WHY would Hindus have a temple in a Mosque? And second, when the Hindus were already worshipping, what right did the Muslims have to stop them?

Historically Muslims have destroyed places of worship that belonged to other religions—from the original temple in Mecca to hundreds of sites in India, Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia and Serbia, among others. Even in Jerusalem the Haram e-Sharif is built on TOP of a Jewish Temple!

God is not the property of Muslims so they have to stop behaving as if this is the case. The day Muslims can find an answer as to why they behave in this manner, they will come one step closer to solving their conflict with other religions and also within Islam.

Recommend