Sunny
High: 28°C
Low: 15°C
Alerts
 
< >

New nikahnama law makes medical checkup compulsory

Published: July 8, 2010

The new amendments make it necessary for both the bride and bridegroom to undergo a medical checkup.

The Punjab Government made eight amendments to the nikahnama Law on Thursday.

A circular was issued by the Local Government and Community Development Department and sent to all DCOs in Punjab, describing the Punjab specific amendments. The new amendments make it necessary for both the bride and bridegroom to undergo a blood test, which is made compulsory to prevent disabled and handicapped births.

The amendments also make it mandatory for parents/guardians of both bride and bridegroom to sign the nikahnama document as witnesses. Mention of the bride and bridegroom’s date-of-birth has also been declared binding.

The amendements in the circular are as follows:

  1. Additional columns and space shall be provided for dowry articles in the nikahnama
  2. In addition to the names of fathers of both the bride and bridegroom, the names of mothers of both the bride and bridegroom shall be recorded with their CNIC numbers and dates of births.
  3. Father and mother of the bride and bridegroom shall sign in the witness to the marriage column.
  4. Marks of identification of both the bride and bridegroom shall be incorporated in the nikahnama.
  5. Medical check up and report of the bride and bridegroom shall be mandatory to obviate any problem in their matrimonial life and subsequently any chance of having abnormal children. Blood groups of the bride and the bridegroom shall be entered in the marriage certificate.
  6. The name of the bride usually changes after the marriage is solemnized which then appears in future documents of the new family. Such a projected change shall be recorded in the certificate.
  7. Instead of mentioning only the age of the bride and bridegroom, their exact dates of birth shall be recorded as in their school certificates/CNIC/Passports.
  8. The latest passport size photos of the bride and bridegroom shall be pasted on the certificate.

The handout says the amendments are effective as of today (Thursday) and no nikah document will be registered without fulfilling these requirements.

According to a report, PPP MNA Sherry Rehman criticized the amendments and said that they would strengthen the organisers of forced marriages.

ADDS

According to the Law Minister, Rana Sanaullah, the Peshawar High Court had asked the Ministry for Religious Affairs to include the eight clauses in the nikahnama, “therefore we’ve done it”. The leader of the Opposition, Chaudhry Zaheerud Din stated that the Punjab government was not bound to adopt the customary laws of any other province.

However, an official of the Local Government and Community Development Department told The Express Tribune that the revisions were made on the suggestion of the chairman of the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII), Muhammad Khalid Masud.

The official said that a notification to this effect was issued on July 6. According to him, the bridegroom’s and bride’s medical fitness certificates must be attached with the nikahnamas, which mention their blood groups.

Other requirements include the precise dates of birth of the bridegroom and bride, their identification marks – if any, two latest passport-size pictures, the names of the parents of both the bride and bridegroom along with their dates of birth and details of the dowry.

The official said that before the 18th Amendment was passed, the nikahnama and divorce forms were federal subjects.

Now they had come under the jurisdiction of the provincial governments. According to the official, the CII chairman had suggested the revisions – particularly the medical fitness certificates – “in order to avoid any unsavoury situation after the marriage.” The chairman’s suggestions had been ignored after some CII members opposed them.

The exact time when the revised nikahnamas will replace the current forms is not yet clear, said the official.

Reader Comments (86)

  • Umayr Masud
    Jul 8, 2010 - 8:26PM

    “The amendments also make it mandatory for parents/guardians of both bride and bridegroom to sign the nikkah nama document as witnesses”

    So now no one can get married without the wali’s consent ..Recommend

  • Imran Yousaf
    Jul 8, 2010 - 8:51PM

    So what about the nikah witch are being held toady , so who will provide them new forms, they should give a deadline first and then implement it.Recommend

  • Syed A. Mateen
    Jul 8, 2010 - 8:57PM

    A good move which should be adopted by rest of the three provinces.

    The information should also be made available on the website, so that it should be known to all what the new amendments are.Recommend

  • Muhammad Ziad
    Jul 8, 2010 - 9:13PM

    No wonder adultery is so common now days.Recommend

  • khizer jalal
    Jul 8, 2010 - 9:42PM

    i think its a good decisionRecommend

  • mussarat ahmedzeb swat
    Jul 8, 2010 - 9:58PM

    Clause 5 is a good dicission all provinces should make a rule of medical check.Recommend

  • Ammar Rashid
    Jul 8, 2010 - 10:00PM

    Apparently, the mandatory medical clause is necessary to “obviate any problem in their matrimonial life and subsequently any chance of having abnormal children.”

    Ergo, the Punjab Government has taken it upon itself to regulate the ‘normality’ of their citizens’ offspring.

    Why – to try and weed out any potential weak links in the indomitable martial races of the Punjab? Does anyone remember a rather famous nation-state that attempted something really similar? Just google ‘Nazi Germany’ and ‘Eugenics’.

    The PML-N’s regressive instincts kicking in again. I doubt they can see the intrinsic immorality of trying to regulate the ‘normality’ of the province’s children. We should point it out to them though.Recommend

  • Jul 8, 2010 - 10:06PM

    Correct decision. However, what if either of the parents of either of the bride and groom has joined the majority? Who will replace him/her for signature?

    The condition of medical report is a positive step but not in Pakistan. It would create more opportunities of corruption in this corrupt society. Doctors should be celebrating their good luck.

    Will this step be helpful in controlling population as many people, especially men, won’t be able to get married for certain diseases?

    Whosoever has got this idea must be awarded a pride of appreciation.Recommend

  • abc
    Jul 8, 2010 - 10:08PM

    haw cant elope now!Recommend

  • Usman Ilyas
    Jul 8, 2010 - 10:25PM

    The requirement for medical checkups pre-marriage is a positive in the interest of full disclosure, so there will be fewer surprises afterwards.

    But if the Punjab government is really serious about stemming incidents of birth defects a more effective means, that is in effect in the US, is a ban on cousin marriages.

    The requirement that parents of both bride and bridegroom have to bear witness is ridiculous! Would someone please explain to me at exactly what age we consider a person grown up, old enough to let them make their own decisions?Recommend

  • Mahvesh
    Jul 8, 2010 - 10:38PM

    Mr. Ammar Rashid, it’s one thing to have a child who is mentally or physically challenged and quite another to have a blood test of the parents and find out that if, say they have a child, he or she will be thallasemic. This isn’t some genetic experiment and is a very logical clause to have.

    The only clause that I would disagree with would be the one requiring the signatures of all parents.Recommend

  • Jul 8, 2010 - 10:47PM

    Endorsing forced marriages and legalising dowries? Wow, as if we already don’t have enough socio-economic and political problems!Recommend

  • Syed Shahid
    Jul 8, 2010 - 11:22PM

    I beg to differ, this law will make the simple process of nikkah into too mechanical venture!Recommend

  • Jul 8, 2010 - 11:48PM

    Well the main thing left from the whole thing the space to give women’s the right to divorce male .. because people specially molvies cut that section from the document which is just bad. Like the husband do all the crap and wife can’t defend herself while a wife do something awkward husband go all the way. No equal laws … !Recommend

  • Asif
    Jul 8, 2010 - 11:51PM

    Great step by Punjab govt. Parents consent should be must, it’d reduce the incidents where girls and boys run away and get married. And when something goes wrong, the girl is the one who suffers.

    Have a passport sized photo on the nikkah nama will reduce the confusion that we witnessed in Shoaib Malik’s case.

    Over all an excellent step. Thumbs up to Punjab govt !!!!!Recommend

  • Usman Virk
    Jul 9, 2010 - 12:27AM

    This thing is totally against the Islam’s teachings.Recommend

  • Ali Haider
    Jul 9, 2010 - 12:34AM

    What is wrong with Punjab Govt? Dowry column in Nikah Nama? It is not only a shameful act but is now legal as well. Now parents can effectively blackmail their children into marriages of their own choice. Are we going back in time or what?Recommend

  • Jul 9, 2010 - 12:45AM

    nice move by Punjab Government… all these amendments were the requirements of the time but i can say anything about the signatures of parents on Nikah Nama.. I m bit double minded in this amendment…Recommend

  • Hasan
    Jul 9, 2010 - 12:58AM

    3.Father and mother of the bride and bridegroom shall sign in the witness
    to the marriage column.

    What if a bride or groom do not have one or both parents? What if bride/groom child has run away due to abusive parent(s) and is not on speaking terms with them? This would also be a blackmailing tool in the hands of abusive parents who will not accept child’s preference to a partner and instead will enforce their own will on the bride/groom. What an idiotic act by Punjab government. Thank you Shehbaz Sharif for bringing in talibanisation from back door. You just can’t help it.Recommend

  • Rabia
    Jul 9, 2010 - 1:14AM

    i disagree wid clause 3…
    its stupid,unislamic and it will only complicate things..Recommend

  • Nojeba
    Jul 9, 2010 - 1:25AM

    Good decision. But why is this applicable to punjab only?why not other provinces? Im not too sure if the parents signatures are a good idea though…I mean it should depend on the free will of the 2 people getting marriedRecommend

  • Sara
    Jul 9, 2010 - 1:33AM

    what does one do if the parents have died? Can you just get anyone to be a guardian? Did they even pause to think about the problems with implementing or verifying such information?Recommend

  • wondering.....
    Jul 9, 2010 - 2:03AM

    welll what tests would be done using the blood….. what diseases would be checked up…which genetic disorders…
    any idea???Recommend

  • Samandar Khan
    Jul 9, 2010 - 2:46AM

    Completely disagree with clause 3. It is entirely un-Islamic and limits the freedom of adult individuals.

    At the same time, I agree with the medical checkup, given the increase in the number of thallesemia patients in the country. Two thallesimia minors getting married should be a crime. It is objecting children to one of the worst diseases out there.

    Peace out
    SamandarRecommend

  • Muhammad Hamza
    Jul 9, 2010 - 2:47AM

    Clause 3 says “Father and mother of the bride and bridegroom shall sign in the witness to the marriage column.”
    So nobody can get married without Father and mother’s approval. Another dangerous step from Punjab’s Taliban chief minister and his cabinet. Even moulvis were not demanding this. If someone has a doubt that we are not moving towards Talibanization, he must be living in some sort of paradise.Recommend

  • Syed Kashif Hassnain Rizvi
    Jul 9, 2010 - 3:08AM

    Salam to All
    the Dowry column is a really shameful, Pakistan Govt. should do action on this issue and make some equall Dowry limits for all according to islamic laws,So nobody could demand extra.
    (3-Father and mother of the bride and bridegroom shall sign in the witness to the marriage column.)
    the above 2 lines make very bad situation in our pakistani society cause there are several families in which mother or father are not agree for the marriage of their son or daughter n if Govt. make this colum that signature is must then you could understand that if father or mother is not agree to signed the paper the couple is unable to get their marriage certificate.
    Medical test is positive thing but it should be free for new couples cause there are several families who cannt afford the fee for it.Recommend

  • Sheheryar
    Jul 9, 2010 - 4:03AM

    Just want to ask one thing. I was going to marry a girl. Her parents wants her to marry her cousin. That was a forced marriage. She didn’t want to marry him so we’ve decided to marry in August. But whatever happened today is shameful. They are changing the islamic law. Now she has to marry that guy because her parents are not gonna accept me. Thanks A lot to our Govt.Recommend

  • Mahrukh
    Jul 9, 2010 - 4:14AM

    Well if we think open mindedly the reality is that dowry is very common practice. So the additional column of dowry will be beneicial for the bride as many females are treated not well because of the blame of bringing less. Signatures of parents is also good in the sense that no party can blame other for keeping them in dark regarding any issue related to eachother, specially when they blame bride that she had some kind of illness before marriage from which the other party was unaware about and vice versa that leads to break up or tensed relation. I hope there must have any kind of other option for parents signature if they are absent in any case which one should be clear about. I think this step is beneficial for majority, and yes its true there are parents who force their children to do what they want, but i dont think sensible parents can go till extreme and those who are extremists are torturing their children already without any law. So i would say its good step for majority of the nation BUT the big IF is that will it be followed as ideally it should be. Hope it doesnt put mullas and doctors into corruption.Recommend

  • Jul 9, 2010 - 4:17AM

    Punjab government is breaking all times records of stupidity or perhaps doing purposefully to ban love marriages. It’s indeed a Talibinization by taking the cover of medical tests. Even the Dowry column is so shameful, IMO.

    I as a resident of Sindh, don’t want this stupid registration in Sindh, So people over who are asking why it’s not in other provinces, because We the people don’t want any thing idiotic like that. I hope, some one would challenge it in Punjab soon.Recommend

  • Mahrukh
    Jul 9, 2010 - 4:19AM

    sorry i mean to say that “sensible parents can not go till extreme”Recommend

  • SD
    Jul 9, 2010 - 5:37AM

    So much for my plans to run away with the girl I love. Kar hi na dey us ka baap sign humara nikkahnama!Recommend

  • Rida
    Jul 9, 2010 - 7:22AM

    eeeeeeee- cousin marriages!!! ~ it leads to having abnormal children anyway, medical check up will just confirm this. What the hell?- are they planning to ban cousin marriages?

    That would be a relief.Recommend

  • Mustafa
    Jul 9, 2010 - 8:38AM

    these steps are entirely non-islamic, they can’t change Islam’s criteria for getting married. Marriage is a religious ritual and it should remain as such. Today they have introduced the clauses for enlisting dowry, sign by parents and medical checkups , just extrapolate it forwards and see how these corrupt cults who have mysteriusly implemented this decision are planning to impose taxes on dowry and medical checkups…just see how they are attacking our social fabric now. birth abnormalities can’t be detected on a single blood test it’s so silly to believe that, it’s entirely a vested decision that must be opposed with full force

    wake up people before it’s too lateRecommend

  • Hakeem Luqman
    Jul 9, 2010 - 8:50AM

    there have been various cases where girls are abducted and forced into marriage by signing nikahnama. Our society is unable to support most woman who claim that they were forced into a marriage by their “in-laws”. Requiring parents’ signature is an attempt to stop such kidnappings as the marriage won’t be legal unless the woman’s parents also sign the papers. Of course the downside are the case when the individuals are willing to marry but the parents do not agree in which case the courts can be called upon to allow the marriage without the parents’ consent.

    similarly including dowry in the nikahnama is an attempt to safeguard women’s rights after marriage. since dowry is a woman’s property, she can take everything with her if the marriage doesn’t work. Our society is full of men who marry a woman to get their hands on the dowry and then within a few months divorce the woman without returning any of her belongings.

    People who are against these two clauses are mainly urbanized and educated individuals who are capable of invoking the not-so-ideal justice system of Pakistan in case anything goes wrong. A typical Pakistani woman is incapable of moving against any mistreatment and thus needs extra protection which is provided by these clauses to some extent.Recommend

  • Tabraiz Mansoor
    Jul 9, 2010 - 9:30AM

    Except for the Medical test clause…. rest is rubbish!

    BTW! Seems to me Dowry is compulsory from now on…… what the HEck!

    Chalo Chalo Sindh chalo….. Nikkah ke liye! :)Recommend

  • Jul 9, 2010 - 10:00AM

    “The amendments also make it mandatory
    for parents/guardians of both bride
    and bridegroom to sign the nikahnama
    document as witnesses. Mention of the
    bride and bridegroom’s date-of-birth
    has also been declared binding.”

    So love marriages banned in Punjab ?Recommend

  • Saif
    Jul 9, 2010 - 10:16AM

    :) Medical checkup!!Recommend

  • Ragu Jaitly
    Jul 9, 2010 - 10:58AM

    Nikaah was already a difficult job while adultry is made easier and easier… this is just an addition to it..

    What kind of Medical Test ? 80% of the population is illitrate and being imposed to VIOLATE these ridiculous rules made by the ELITE of this corrupt society..

    Alaas if we cant make haraam dificult why cant we making halal easier.

    Was’nt it enough to ensure that bride/bridegroom have to be adults (over 18) to be able to marry each other in the presence of witnesses ? when did any famous islamic society has forced such rules as making parents’s consent compulsory in past ?

    God Bless our Beloved Pakistan, AMINRecommend

  • Ghulam Abbass
    Jul 9, 2010 - 11:26AM

    ridiculous…..purpose of regulation should be to make it easier for people to get married not difficult…..But the majority of readers here seem to like government regulation and interferance in their private lives.Recommend

  • ND
    Jul 9, 2010 - 11:33AM

    @Hakeem Luqman..(1) The dowry article is already available in our Muslim Family Laws…do you see any implementation of MFL law??
    (2) Any of you see the implementation of Judicial Policy which says the family cases will be resolved by the courts in six months?
    (3) Mandatory signatures of parents is a contradictory clause to the Supreme Courts Decisions in which SC allowed the marriages without the consent of the Wali.
    (4) Making fake Reports would be a happy job for medical practitioners in exchange of bribe…NO?
    (5)Parents Data and signatures has nothing to do with the healthy kids of bride and groom.
    (6) Do you really think that it is the safeguard of the women to mention her date of birth?? Dont we know our communal culture? are we not going to shut down the only possible solution for over aged girls in our society???Recommend

  • Jul 9, 2010 - 11:50AM

    Well. We all know how awesome our government is, whether it is run by bureaucrats, military officers or politicians. Nobody knows anything about what the public want.
    But I think this Act – already a shame on Pakistan’s social structure – lacks one crucial clause: shouldn’t it also be made legally binding on the bride and groom to be in love with each other if they want to get married?
    If we’ve got the parents on board, the medical staff and hospital on board, we should also make it compulsory for the bride and groom to legally declare their love for each other. So that if anything goes wrong, everyone KNOWS who to blame!
    So much for legislation and legitimacy.Recommend

  • MUHAMMAD WASEEM ELAHI
    Jul 9, 2010 - 12:01PM

    In my view, the Punjab Government has not initiated a good move in this regard. The proposed ammendments are not in line with the Islamic Personal Law neither with the fundamental rights of a person. Its rediculous, rubbish, rude and illegal. Challengeable in appropriate court of law.Recommend

  • Jul 9, 2010 - 12:16PM

    Compulsory parent signatures??
    where i absolutely respect my parents decision, whatever happened to the being legally allowed to make own decisions?

    Dowry?
    there should be an article where every dowry item is compensated by a Bari item of equal value to balance the pressure on both parties and try to end this system.

    Medical Checkups
    Agreed, so that the false claims of impotency and abnormalities dont lead to divorces, however details of these tests should be given while the nikahnama should be formed in a way that it doesnt cause any embarassments to any individualRecommend

  • A 4 F
    Jul 9, 2010 - 12:25PM

    Well if we think open mindedly the reality is that dowry is very common practice. So the additional column of dowry will be beneicial for the bride as many females are treated not well because of the blame of bringing less. Signatures of parents is also good in the sense that no party can blame other for keeping them in dark regarding any issue related to eachother, specially when they blame bride that she had some kind of illness before marriage from which the other party was unaware about and vice versa that leads to break up or tensed relation. I hope there must have any kind of other option for parents signature if they are absent in any case which one should be clear about. I think this step is beneficial for majority, and yes its true there are parents who force their children to do what they want, but i dont think sensible parents can go till extreme and those who are extremists are torturing their children already without any law. So i would say its good step for majority of the nation BUT the big IF is that will it be followed as ideally it should be. Hope it doesnt put mullas and doctors into corruption.Recommend

  • dr.Salman
    Jul 9, 2010 - 1:09PM

    what stupid law by our stupid talib cheif minister, having parents signature is just ridiculous,so basically no one over the age of 18 has free will to get married.adding more columns to dowry section is shameful, instead of removing it they are actually promoting it.as for medical tests,what tests are we talking about, what else are we checking here, hep B, HIV, infertility,mental retardation,pysch profiling and the list goes on,btw u need to have informed consent for these things even in developed countries. there should have been a debate on media and the parliament about these issues and then they should have been implemented.its a ban on basic civil rights and a step towards talibanization. what a stupid act implemented by our stupid leaders. i m disgusted.Recommend

  • Saira
    Jul 9, 2010 - 1:17PM

    One, a simple blood test is not going to put a ban on cousin marriages. LOL.

    That would require a DNA test.

    Two, dowry should be condemned – not institutionalized.

    Three, Islam gives individuals freedom to get married.Recommend

  • Fahd Ali Raza
    Jul 9, 2010 - 1:40PM

    The new law would probably not stand long. It is too generic. It does not take into consideration older couples getting married. Also, it begs the question of male wali, who is not necessary. Thirdly, it may be alright for the bride and the groom to know of each others illnesses, but why should anyone except them, including their parents know? Why should the Nikah registrar be made aware? Why NADRA?

    Someone will probably challenge this in court very soon, and the law will not last long.Recommend

  • PAKI
    Jul 9, 2010 - 1:55PM

    The new nikkha nama is awe-inspiring and I effusively support it, people who are disparateing clause no. 3 are simply **“POLO”** (mint with the) because they want to get married against their parents will. And getting married against parents will would be against Islam too so people at least have some intelligence and don’t be in opposition to it just for the sake of opposing.
    Talibanization or whatever but a very good decision by the government.
    ATLEAST THE NEW NIKKHA NAMMARecommend

  • Ben
    Jul 9, 2010 - 2:20PM

    Marriages are made in heaven….. and forced in Punjab. Read another story at link textRecommend

  • Mohammad Rizwan
    Jul 9, 2010 - 3:04PM

    It should in all over the Pakistan not only in Punjab.Recommend

  • Jul 9, 2010 - 3:29PM

    I agree with Rizwan, it will solve many problems. Especially decrease the rate of “Bhag kay Shadi kernaRecommend

  • Hasan
    Jul 9, 2010 - 3:44PM

    It should in all over the Pakistan not
    only in Punjab.

    Why don’t you go to Punjab if you like it so much and leave us alone.Recommend

  • Imtiaz Hussain (Advocate)
    Jul 9, 2010 - 3:47PM

    No doubt, this law is a combination of good n bad clauses but apparently it is overwhelmed with bad clauses which are morally, religiously n socially unacceptable.To sign Nikah Nama as a witness from both sides,will ultimately lead towards forced marriages,even the male ones.Mention dowery in Nikah Nama,means legalization of this curse.Medical check up,is this the guarantee of normal births?Think being parents/guardians of a girl who are managing hardly to see off (wed) her daughter,but she is not accepted by bridegroom or his parents or relatives.What will be the future of that girl?Even all agree despite of some decease,will it not make a fun of or ridiculous situation of the couple by the guests(baratees,relatives from both sides)Over all we can say this law will create implications and will contribute to make Nikah(wed) more difficult.
    In the great days of Islam,Nikah was made easier,that is why Zina(rape)was considered among the greatest crime.The more difficult the Nikah is the more high the Zina ratio will be.The easier the Nikah is,the minimum ratio of Zina will be.Now we all need to think,is this a step to make Nikah easier or difficult.If difficult,what kind of society our Government is going to promote.In a nutshell we can say this law is not acceptable to any rational Muslim, because it will give rise to -ve more than +ve effects on our society.Recommend

  • Munazza sami
    Jul 9, 2010 - 4:06PM

    Punjab Govt. should bring some amendments and rules against crime,unemployment and rise in prices of needs commodity…….What will the poor person do if he is going to get marry with someone…should he spent his earning for his wedding arrangements, future life or Medical Checkup?Is govt bear the expense of medical checkup for every couple? Sometime we should leave some matter to ALLAH…what will they do if they found something wrong medically in anyone?I think Govt should involve and make steps for the betterment of resident Punjab rather than to be an AKKA BUWAA of mohallaRecommend

  • Pakistani Aloo
    Jul 9, 2010 - 4:07PM

    No Nikahnama in history has ever required the consent of both parents. Punjab has now deemed people older than 18 unable to choose their own life partners.
    And how on earth does a blood test prevent defected births? With the amazing medical facilities our country has, how can they know?

    So now the government decides through blood tests whether you can marry the person you want or not????????

    This is open license to doctors. They will ask for bribery with a smile now. Thank you Punjab government. Your delusional thinking never ceases to amaze me.Recommend

  • SD
    Jul 9, 2010 - 4:24PM

    Whos writing to the Chief Justice? Raise hands?

    boths hands raisedRecommend

  • dr ayesha
    Jul 9, 2010 - 4:33PM

    ridiculous how people are appreciating the clause about medical check ups, some one mentioned thalassemia, now some one who is a carrier of thalassemia( means has the gene but not the disease)cannot be forced to carry out a test to find out, as it is against ethics. have they considered the social and psychological implications? if they really want to stop having abnormal babies they should allow tests on the babies not yet born as a lot of abnormalities happen there,(like the very common downs syndrom wich is not transmitted by genes) would the then allow selective abortions???isnt that a better way to prevent having abnormal babies???
    they wouldnt for sure so why make such an absurd law??? certainly people doing the law making have no idea what they are talking about.
    why not ask for tests of sexually transmitted diseases like HIV and hep B and even that is ethically incorrect
    what would they achieve by this, if any testing is to be done it should be the couple’s prerogative not the government
    i would rather like to see a legislation making it mandatory for adolescent to have sex education :SRecommend

  • Zahid
    Jul 9, 2010 - 5:11PM

    Bakwaas – This is rubbish. Not acceptable.Recommend

  • Ibrar
    Jul 9, 2010 - 6:27PM

    Money making scheme for the goverment.

    i do however believe in a register so that men cant just walkaway from previous marriages without paying thier dues to the ones they leave behind! This is too easily done in Pakistan.

    the rest is all trash – genetics and blood tests. what a load of baloni. i my granps had 13 kids. i have over 35 cousins married into cousins – wont even try and count thier off spring but there is only one child with a disability – caused by premature birth at 6 months.

    i’m sure there is indeed medical eveidence to suggest something of the sort- only its not apparrent in those around me.

    nikah should take 3 minutes. 1 line as required by religeous law and then the acceptance of gifts, give every one a sweet each, kick everyone out and get on with the final rite to seal marriage.Recommend

  • Jul 9, 2010 - 6:49PM

    I supported this implement because of medical check-up clause, I know how one suffers from genetic diseases, go out and see yourself then speak up.. but hey.. don’t do that.. be happy! Punjab Govt has withdraws those modifications: http://tribune.com.pk/story/26738/punjab-govt-withdraws-nikah-nama-notification/

    Be happy guys! and keep ruining the next generations!Recommend

  • Ali
    Jul 9, 2010 - 7:20PM

    Dont worry guys, you can still runaway with your girlfriend and get married….The court is there to protect you…..”Stop Adultry and get Married!!!!Recommend

  • Laila
    Jul 9, 2010 - 7:44PM

    Oh dear God, just when I thought my beloved country couldnt sink any lower.
    Whatever happenend to being full of age?? Isnt there in Pakistan a legally binding age, when a person is adult. And what happens if a bride or bridegroom’s parents are dead.So no more shaadi for orphans??Recommend

  • PAKI
    Jul 9, 2010 - 8:01PM

    Every one is petrified because now they can’t run away and get married, and people bring to an end using Islam for your own good. The law isn’t in opposition to Islam if some one consider it like that stop commenting through lame grounds and should draw closer up with legitimate references and accurate explanation on what basis it should not be put into practice.
    Yes it should be implemented all over Pakistan.Recommend

  • Jul 9, 2010 - 9:41PM

    some clauses are good,, some are not////Recommend

  • Fawwad Shafi
    Jul 9, 2010 - 10:21PM

    “The amendments also make it mandatory for parents/guardians of both bride and bridegroom to sign the nikkah nama document as witnesses” Absurd. This is wrong!Recommend

  • Ghausia
    Jul 9, 2010 - 10:29PM

    Clause 5= Prevention of STDs due to the fact that premarital sex is extremely common and no longer confined to sex workers. Thus, clause 5 is actually a good thing.Recommend

  • Uzma Afzal
    Jul 9, 2010 - 11:54PM

    It’s good to have a medical check-up in a country where arrange marriages are predominant and people are completely unaware about the physical status of their partners. Unfortunately, as mentioned in an earlier comment, it will open avenues for forged medical reports and medical malpractice. And, if the government really wants to prevent abnormal births, then the rampant practice of cousin marriages should be discouraged, if not completely banned.

    Signature of parents on the nikkahnama is a cheap attempt at pleasing the conservative right. PML-N needs to realize that this action is against the basic right of free will. In a free country, once an adult, an individual has the absolute right to choose his/her spouse and this clause will inadvertently reinforce the practice of forced marriages. It will especially diminish women rights to an alarming extreme.Recommend

  • Kaash
    Jul 10, 2010 - 12:36AM

    So now marriage will be dependent on blood match. I don’t think so that medical reports can help reduce birth problems.Recommend

  • Kashif
    Jul 10, 2010 - 2:09AM

    Punjab government has recalled this decision otherwise I would have said.

    Signature of parents are not neccessary when the bride and groom both are adults.
    There’s no specification on what diseases will be checked in medical checkup. I would highly recomend that couples should be checked for Thalassaemia traits, Hepatitis/HIV (All STDs).Recommend

  • Gulshad Ahmed
    Jul 10, 2010 - 10:00AM

    Although, it is a good changes proposed in the latest Nuptial (Nikahnama), the process of its imposing is questionable. Moreover, the clause related to parental consent is also objectionable and however, it is a good move towards happy and healthy life regarding medical certificate but most of the people will not go to doctor for medical check up and might receive fake medical fitness certificate in especially in the region like Pakistan, where laws are made but not imposed. I appreciate this act of Punjab’s Government and urge to make it more comprehensive.

    Think a bit!Recommend

  • M. Salim
    Jul 10, 2010 - 10:09AM

    EndorsedRecommend

  • Mrs. Hasan
    Jul 10, 2010 - 11:56AM

    What insanity! So if a girl ends up having an unfortunate medical result, her fiance would dump her and no one else would want to marry her. Having children is not prerequisite to marriage but this law will force even sane Punjabis to make retarded decisions. So much for our faith in Allah and his Will. Atrocious! Good thing we have other provinces so still some hope for ‘em lovebirds :)Recommend

  • Ghulam-e-Ali
    Jul 10, 2010 - 12:38PM

    Eugenics!

    The proposal’s been generated by bureacrats. Perhaps, well-intentioned bureacrats. But politician’s aren’t stupid enough to propose eugenics and irritate an already irritated society any further.Recommend

  • Mohammad Syed
    Jul 10, 2010 - 2:22PM

    I agree and disagree with lots of comments.
    I agree having a medical checkup even in form of simple blood test should be Ok, making it a law it might not be the right thing with a civil liberty and privacy point of view but yes it should now introduced. I am a victim of a marriage myself where my wife was Hep B positive and the parents hid it from me. Fortunately I come to know it before I have contracted it so I had my vaccinations done. But what if I had contracted it? It would be very upsetting for me Psychologically.

    About having mandatory signature from both side of parents is simply contradictory to Pakistani and Islamic law so there is no question about it. Its already in place to be able to marry with parents concent when you are at younger age means under 18 but over 16 you can be married with parents signature, but obviously you can’t make it for every age, what if my father want to marry a second wife? at what age will he be considered an “ADULT”? what if my father doesnot agree to my sisters choice of marriage and he refuse to let her marry the man of her choice?

    It sounds like an excersize to control woman rights so no ones daughter can marry man with out parents consent. extremaly primitive attitude towards todays digital age. We should be removing the clauses which stops people getting married instead putting more hurdle in it.

    Mandatory Signature will only create more people running away from home and seeking refuge in to other cities of Pakistan and getting married if they really really want to get married that will cause another security risk for these new couples.

    May be its time for our parents to grow up and start looking at us as a human being with needs then slaves..Recommend

  • Mohammad Syed
    Jul 10, 2010 - 2:36PM

    Totally Agreed with you Mrs Hasan, Its a stupid law, I live in Australia and I had been married here, there was no questions in marrying a woman, no medical certificate no signature nothing, its because they promote marriage and keep the sacredness of it. If some one is so worried about the medical history of the person then they have every right to ask for the medical checkup but making it compulsory?? who will not have some medical issues? wouldn’t you become a point of discussion for the people?

    Medical Certificate can be customary only. I believe Parents should ask for the blood test for certain issues like AIDS HEP and Blood Cancer type of problems. but thats about it..

    I don’t think Punjab Govt need to take responsibility of the retardation of my child.Recommend

  • Mohammad Syed
    Jul 10, 2010 - 3:41PM

    I think we should change our country’s name from Pakistan to Pagalistan. There is no right decision come out of these people..Recommend

  • Samandar Khan
    Jul 10, 2010 - 3:58PM

    I stand by the Punjab government’s decision on the medical checkup. If parents are unware of illnesses such as Thallassemia, why should the child suffer for their ignorance? And, as far as Pakistan is concerned, not even the most educated of the lot know about this disease.

    When it come to other sexually transmitted diseases where only the couple is at risk of catching them, it is perfectly fine for it to be left upto them on whether they should get medical checkups or not. They are adults and responsible for themselves. But, with specific diseases like Thallassemia and even HIV AIDS (which can be transferred onto the child during birth), such couples should be tested, because it is not just them who are involved now. The child’s health is at risk as well. And, a child is not your property to subject to such ordeals. He/she is a separate individual.

    Peace to all,

    SamandarRecommend

  • Jul 10, 2010 - 4:13PM

    @Samandar Khan
    Totally agreed about basic blood test for HIV AIDs and other terminal kind of issues. But making it a law is wrong. it should be custom to introduce blood test from both sides but the trouble is that our society is not that educated who understand the meaning of the inactive virus or active virus. they will only make fun of the person who has it.

    It is good to see it happening but very non practical to do it and not to mention very unethical in the society of Pakistan, you might never get married if you have a mistaken blood sample or some doctor accidentally did the wrong report.

    Medical conditions are private, you can ask if u suspect and if person refuse to do it then you should move on instead having a go with that person.

    Rest is in Allah’s hands. he can give you any thing with out you asking for it. My mother passed away from Hep C which she contracted in USA by blood transfusion. Where do i go to complain?? can a compensation replaces my mother ?Recommend

  • Jul 10, 2010 - 4:32PM

    @Samandar Khan: I wish everyone start thinking like you! :)Recommend

  • Jeddy
    Jul 10, 2010 - 6:30PM

    The medical requirement should be essential prior to marriage. People who belong to families who have had history of hyper-tension, diabetes, Thalasemia and whole range of other hereditary should never get married. But God should be the only witness.Recommend

  • Baig
    Jul 11, 2010 - 12:45AM

    Garbage…Recommend

  • Jul 11, 2010 - 8:14AM

    What kind of Medical Test ? 80% of the population is illitrate and being imposed to VIOLATE these ridiculous rules made by the ELITE of this corrupt society..
    In rural areas of Punjab , more than 60% medical tests was incorrect due to non availability of Medical facilities.In these tests Laboratries says to Girl or Boy that you dont have ablitiy to become parent.But after marriage 99% these parents become parents successfully.
    So what happend if a medical report come like above mention.
    or first make highly equiped medical laboratories in each union coucil of Punjab / provide highly qualified staff with equipment on each basic health unit in South Punjab before implement this point.
    Punjab Government has not initiated a good move in this regard. The proposed ammendments are not in line with the Islamic Personal Law neither with the fundamental rights of a person. Its rediculous, rubbish, rude and illegal. Challengeable in appropriate court of law.
    With signature of Parents…..
    I feel by using this point the parents enforeced there children according to there wish.
    I agree with statement of Sherry Rehman inwhich she says by “criticized the amendments and said that they would strengthen the organisers of forced marriages.”

    Punjab Govt must remove the Medical Test and Signature of parents of both.
    because both points are violation of the basic Human rights.

    Muhammad Amjad
    South Punjab
    Rahim YAr KhanRecommend

  • sohail
    Jul 11, 2010 - 12:46PM

    there shall be no jobless doctor in the countryRecommend

  • noni...
    Jul 12, 2010 - 4:08PM

    parents as a witness is good but medical checkup is not walid because normality and abnormality is in the hAnd of ALLAH….so acording to islamic point of view its wrong…..Recommend

  • Kashif
    Jul 13, 2010 - 12:35PM

    I think most of the people here are taking it the wrong way. I don’t think the law would have restricted the marriage. They just wanted to make the test mandatory, whether marrying that person or not is purely the couple’s and their families decision.

    Some people commented against the medical checkup and some1 even said it unislamic. I would like to say this to my those friends that u cant feel the pain of those families who have been the victim. I am a father of Thalassaemia Major child and it was my right to know that I was a carrier. If the law would have been there it might have prevented my son to be the Thalassaemia Major.

    Some1 mentioned about the test of unborn babies (pre-natal) test, I can give u tens of examples of pre-natal tests whose results were not accurate an still an infected baby was born.

    No one’s forcing here to prevent the marriage. Its your decision but atleast make an informed decision evaluating all the consequences.Recommend

  • onnoes
    Jul 19, 2010 - 6:21PM

    Jinnah and Ruttie would never have been able to get married if they had to put up with these laws! What is this? This is not Jinnah’s Pakistan!Recommend

More in Pakistan

X