Police are also reportedly exploring the possibility that Shahbaz, taken away after armed motorcyclists surrounded his car, dragged him out and drove him away in a larger vehicle, may have been abducted over a business feud. There has, since Salmaan’s death been some litigation involving business affairs. This is, of course, a possibility. But it is disturbing that a broad daylight abduction took place on a day when security was already on high alert because of Jummatul Wida. There are also other aspects to the crime that are disturbing. The kidnapping hit news channel headlines minutes after it occurred. Yet the disappearance of ordinary people, which happens day in day out in this land, goes relatively unnoticed by those in authority. Kidnappings of businessmen, traders and others — some members of minority communities — take place on what is a regular basis across the country but we don’t see the prime minister giving pledges that all state resources will be used to ensure their safe return. Some of these people have been missing for years and in most cases their families lack the influence to make their voices heard. One can only hope that Mr Taseer returns home safe as soon as possible. However, the government also needs to give a thought to the fact that lives of just about every ordinary citizen need to be made safer, whether they ride limousines or motorcycles.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 27th, 2011.
COMMENTS (34)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Sad Panda:
Explicitly point out my words where I defined liberal as anyone who doesnt agree with me. But still, thanks for justifying name pointing, liberals can justify anything! I simply enjoy them when they generalize others! :D
@Sad Panda:
The punishment for theft in Islam is amputation of the hand. Now tell me how many Muslim countries have effectively imposed this throughout the world today.
Like I said, its an irrational argument that just because 52 Muslim countries dont have a same law, it means its unIslamic. I am not paddling anything, its you who are failing to understand!
@Shock Horror: I am as clear as clear can be. There should be a church as long as it does not cause any problems to the Muslims worshiping inside the Badshai Mosque or causes any other form of distortion to the religious practices there.
Now tell me this, how is the Mosque at Ground Zero causing problems to the Jews and Christians worshiping or distorting their religious practises? You only package up your answer in a vague expression " serious objections", kindly elaborate! on the contrary, buliding this mosque in my view would be a defeat of extremists!
@Gilani. You are not answering my question and instead of paddling your views as facts again and again. Here I go again. Can the federal Shariat Court decision on Blasphemy law be accepted as law in all the muslim countries or not. If not, why not? Are we, 180 million Paks, a special kind of muslims and our laws hold supreme over other country laws. Regarding your illogical point on democracy, kingdom etc in muslim countries. Democracy, socialism etc are all man made systems not divine in nature. Islam is a divine message and its laws should be the same across all muslim nations. We can not have one law in Pakistan and some other variant in other countries. That makes the blasphemy law, in Pakistan, man made. You are accusing others of calling you mullah but from the onset you are calling anyone who is not with you as a "liberal". Then why complain when you are returned the favor in same token. Instead of name calling please share with us some concrete evidence. BTW what if I tell you I have a beard, degree from IIU in Islamic studies and a masters in theology from a very well known Egyptian university, will that still make me a liberal in your eyes.
@Abdul Rehman Gilani: Still no straight answer. You qualify your answer by saying, "as long as it does not cause any problems to the Muslims worshiping inside the Badshai Mosque or causes any other form of distortion to the religious practices there."
On the basis of your qualifying statement, you should accept that Christians and Jews have serious objections to the building of the mosque at Ground Zero. End of story and arguments. QED
@Gimmeabreak:
Thank you, I dont need enlightenment from liberals who consider themselves superior in intellect, and cant get out of their shell of narcissism.
I have repeatedly stated to improve the implementation of the law. And secondly, in the Federal Shariat Court, the blasphemy law applies to all Prophets( May Allah's Peace And Blessing Be Upon Them).
And by the way, there is no such thing as a cruel law, kindly dont be vague in your expression. Also I do not find any vested interests in defending this law. And I dont mind if you all have issues, it only shows how much "tolerant" in reality liberals are......
@Shock Horror:
I personally dont have any problem with a church, as long as it does not cause any problems to the Muslims worshiping inside the Badshai Mosque or causes any other form of distortion to the religious practices there. But frankly speaking, I dont see any efficacy of building a church there, that still wont mitigate the liberals lampooning .
It is ironic to say, but near that area is a Red Light district!
@Abdul Rehman Gilani: I accept your statement that your opinions have no value. You fail to answer a simple question the answer to which can only be YES or NO.
@Abdul Rehman Gilani: The fact that this law is misused is a key case for getting rid of it. My main point though, is that this law has NO basis in Islam. Who are we, any of us, to take the law in our own hands? Who is any of us to declare someone a Muslim or not (ref: The law declaring Ahmedis as non-Muslims). Secondly, the reason why liberals quote Javed Ghamdi is because he;s the only Islamic scholar we have who actually speaks through logic and sense, and has no hypocrisies about him.
@Gilani Ground zero mosque was being built on the site that housed a church,which got destroyed in 9/11 attacks. How would you feel if a temple or church is constructed on site of a destroyed mosque? Babri Masjid? Secondly the financier of the mosque was Prince Waleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia, who also happens to be the 2nd biggest stakeholder of the FOX news, a channel that spews hatred against Muslims, hispanics and blacks. Then the name cordoba has always been offensive to the christians after the muslim invasion of Cordoba city in Spain..put yourself in their shoes
Salman Taseer is a true martyr as he died trying to save a poor woman's life... Islam is a religion of mercy and compassion and forgiveness is the most vital aspect of Islam, unless sin like murder,rape or genocide is committed
@Gilani. So this is how you acquire knowledge by googling it. My constant prodding made you google and give me a lame answer. The Federal Shariat court also specifies in its decision to collaborate with ulemas from different muslim countries, preferably from Saudi Arabia and Jamia Al Azhar in Egypt to fine tune the law. What are your views on it.
So you are saying that we shouldnt worry about the 52 muslim countries and instead have our own law. Well Islamic laws are universal and they must be consistant across all muslim nations. So from your answer you just proved it that its a man made law for the consumption of Pakistan. There are 1.2 billion muslims in the this world and only 180 million reside in Pakistan and our blasphemy law can not be implemented on the rest of the muslim ummah. As I say please kindly read some books on islamic law and its implementation and lay of google for knowledge.
@Abdul Rehman Gilani: Before you go on any further about mosque on ground zero, answer the simple question, "Would you allow the construction of a church next to Badshahi mosque?" No ifs no buts, simple yes or no.
@Muhammad Akbar: Your declaration of any aalim anything without proof showcases nothing. They are much more learned than you in Islamic matters, that much is certain.
@Abdul Rehman Gilani: In the Land of Sheer Hypocrisy people like you, and some Pakistani lawyers, garland and praise the killer of Salman Taseer because he was a liberal and opposed the blasphemy law. Yet you have the temerity to say America is bad because some Americans oppose the building of a mosque on ground left empty by Wahabi Muslim killers from Saudi Arabia who killed 3000 innocents. So as I said in my first response you obviously think that individuals with depraved views like yours should be allowed to propagate their views in Europe and America. Height of sheer hypocrisy indeed.!
Abdul Rehman Gilani- you are the cancer that is eating up Pakistani society.
How can you trust the mischievious Ibtisam Zaheer or the ignorant Mufti Munib over the Holy Prophet saw who himself did not prescribe any punishment for blasphemy.
You are promoting murder in the name of Our benevolent Holy Prophet saw. You are the one committing real blasphemy by spreading hate in the name of Islam.
@Gilani. First of all its "you are" not "your" next time you decide to specify an individual. Secondly, you did not answer my main question... How many Islamic countries have blasphemy law like Pakistan in their books? and if they do not why don't they? By calling me naive you have already conceded defeat since you could not come out with an intelligent response and thus you decided to use words like naive to cover your embarrassment. YOu are talking about one mosque near ground zero. Well how many churches are being built in Pakistan as of now. How about building a church right next to badshahi mosque? And for your information there are not one but two mosques near ground zero. The mayor of New York personally see to it that no one dares to stop the construction of the mosque. You can go and visit NYC and see the mosques for yourself. This was about an abduction of a young man and you have tried to hijack it for your own nefarious designs. While you are calling people liberal this and liberal that but you get into a fit if someone calls you a mullah. Now please take some time to research and share with us about how many islamic countries have blasphemy law on their books. Right now you are just trying to cloth your twisted views into facts and have not provided a single hadith or a reference to back your claims.
@sheryar:
Wow, so now I am a mullah, thanks alot. That is so far from the truth, but its typical of liberals to generalize so your statements are understandable.
@Khan:
Get off that high horse, and stop being a snob, seriously, its very amusing to see liberals being self-righteous.
@MK: The gist of your argument is that the blasphemy law is misused, now tell me, which law in Pakistan isnt? Arent fake murder or rape cases established in Pakistan just to fulfil personal vendettas! So does that mean we should abolish all laws pertaining to them?
And I dont understand, all liberals want to hear is Javed Ghamidi, as if he is the only scholar alive in Pakistan, are authentic ulema like Ibtisaam Elahi Zaheer, or Mufti Muneeb Ur Rehman non-existent? Fact is an overwhelming majority of the ulema support this law, and as earlier stated it is Islamic!
@Abdul Rehman Gilani: You obviously do not know what you are talking about. At least in the West people are allowed to practice their religions and set up mosques, temples and churches. You cannot say that about the Land of the Pure or should it be Land of the Impure? Certainly no one will accuse this land of such freedoms.
@Abdul Rehman Gilani You're just trolling around .. You need a reality check maybe if it happens to you or your family you'll realize. Sad how we have to resort to it happening to our families to realize
@Abdul Rehman Gilani: Firstly, the present of so-called ulema approving the law 6 times means nothing to me. That law has NO roots and NO justification in Islam. How would you defend Javed Ghamdi's extremely clear and lucid appeal that the blasphemy law needs to be repealed? http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/20/islam-ghamidi-pakistan-blasphemy-laws
I quote, "The blasphemy laws have no justification in Islam. These ulema [council of clerics] are just telling lies to the people,"..I fail to understand why you appear to lose all grounds of humanity when this law comes in question?
Do you honestly think that it is okay to use this law to kill and punish innocent people just to settle personal vendettas? Because in a place like Pakistan, where a) people just need an excuse to get even and b) the only thing that excites them is religion and the feeling of being 'holier than thou', this law is just an easy way to get off with murder.
I'd also, ask you what your feelings about the law were, if you appeared to belong to PK's minority..but oh wait, you'd actually have to care about them first. P.S. Salman Rushdie is an actual human being - Islam doesn't teach us to malign and slander others.
@Shock Horror:
Do not talk about Europe or America, they have no respect for Islam any way. Remember that competition for defamatory caricatures last year!
@MK:
Fact is that the Federal Shariat Court has validated this law with 6 ulema as advisers, and I think it remains out of the question as to whether its Islamic or not.
@Sad Panda:
Dear your very naive, check out a guy named salman rushdie. Now if you want people like him to spawn in Pakistan, then your in for trouble. And if your so impressed by Saudia, then why dont we have kingdom rule in Pakistan then!
@Khan: On another page, you "educated jaahil" compared the Holy Prophet Pbuh's Uncle Hazrat Hamza R.A. to that boozer taseer, I think you should get off that high horse before passing comments about others with the intention of showing yourself virtuous.
@Abdul Rehman Gilani
People like you are the reason that we are stuck in our present state. Sadly you are the majority. May God give people like you some compassion for human beings as well.
@Abdul Rehman Gilani: No doubt you also think that people, with depraved views like yours, should be welcome to propagate these views in other parts of the world like Europe and North America!
@Abdul Rehman Gilani: Oh please..give us a break. That blasphemy law is the first thing that needs to be changed about this country. Do you have ANY idea how frequently that law is used to counter personal attacks, fights over property and malign innocent people's dignity? Who are we - ANY of us - to pass an opinion of the death sentence. Shouldn't we leave such matters to the Highest Authority? And as to the fact that this law is "Islamic"? Please. Pakistan is the only country to create such an absurd law - I haven't seen such a law any other "Islamic" country. So please, for next time, keep your biased opinions to yourself. Islam is meant to promulgate peace, love and tolerance - for ALL people - irrespective of religion, cast or creed. I think we need to re-think what that means.
@Gilani. Can you tell me about any other muslim country where the blasphemy law is in the books the way it is in Pakistan. I checked Saudi Arabia and they do not have any blasphemy law. Indonesia has one in the books which has five year sentence and monetary fine for the offender. There are 52 muslim countries in the world, please provide us with details on how many have this law? If any muslim country does not have this law does it make that country unislamic or should we send Pakistani ulema to show them the right path. Islamic laws are universal so thus if we have one law in Pakistan than it should apply to all the other muslim countries also, right?
BTW no muslim, in his right mind, will ever dare to malign the Prophet (PBUH).
The Blasphemy law should remain intact, I do NOT agree that in the name of freedom of expression should this law be changed. And fact is that the Federal Shariat Court has validated this law, that should be enough to say that this is law is absolutely Islamic. Ironically, Benazir had the law passed!
Why police is not so efficient for common man? I even did not know that police have forensic experts and laboratories. Well may be they are used only for rich people cases.
who cares about 98% common man.
After reading this editorial, I want to say that salman taser's own fiery remarks were responsible for his death. Fact is, that many liberals wanted to have this law abolished due to their on perverse agenda. If the implementation of this law is improved, but the punishment kept intact, then I dont think anyone has a problem with the law, but NO WAY should the death penalty be removed using the expression of freedom of speech.