NATO says strikes on Afghan homes 'necessary'

There will be continued coordination with Afghan security forces on such operations: NATO


Afp May 31, 2011

BRUSSELS: NATO air strikes on houses in Afghanistan are necessary and will continue in coordination with Afghan forces, the alliance said Tuesday, after President Hamid Karzai said such operations must stop.

Spokeswoman Oana Lungescu said NATO and Afghan authorities are investigating Saturday's bombing of a compound in Helmand province, which Karzai said left 14 civilians dead, but made clear there would be no halt to such operations.

"There will be continued coordination with Afghan security forces on such operations. They are necessary, they continue to be necessary, but they are conducted in coordination and together with Afghan security forces," she told reporters.

The spokeswoman said that NATO commanders "make every effort to ensure there is no loss of innocent life".

Afghan authorities say 11 of those killed on Saturday were children.

"These operations are conducted together with Afghan forces and I think in 85 percent of such operations no shot is fired," Lungescu said, adding that for NATO "every life is precious so we regret the loss of any life."

"We continue to take very seriously concerns expressed by President Karzai," she added.

Karzai warned Tuesday that the foreign mission in Afghanistan risks becoming an "occupying force" if air strikes continue to cause civilian casualties, and he reiterated that bombing the homes of ordinary Afghans was now "banned."

NATO's International Security Assistance Force put the death toll in the incident in southern Helmand at nine and has apologised. It said the strike was carried out after insurgents who had earlier killed a patrolling marine hid in a compound and carried on firing.

Western military figures say that hiding among civilians is a regular Taliban tactic when they are being pursued by international forces.

COMMENTS (2)

Chilli | 12 years ago | Reply NATO has no sympathies for Afghan civillians. They are actually testing their war machines on Afghans.
S.R.H. Hashmi | 12 years ago | Reply I know at one time the British police did not carry arms. The thinking behind this was that, for example, if criminals were robbing a bank and they were challenged by the police, knowing that the police did not carry arms, they will make every effort to flee. As against this, if armed robbers were challenged by armed police, they will put up a fight and in the ensuing exchange of fire, some innocent members of public could get hurt and even killed. The basic idea was that the safety of members of public is paramount and in order to ensure that, police were even prepared to let some robbers get away. Also, the basic spirit of law is that hundred criminals may get away but not a single innocent person should be punished, and it is under this clause that the benefit of doubt is always given to the accused. The NATO forces are contravening both the provisions and on top of that, they are claiming that attacks on home, which are bound to kill innocent people, are necessary. This is as barbaric as one can get. It is not all that long that the western powers gave independence to their colonies but they are back at their old game and have begun colonizing different parts of the parts of the world on various pretexts. It is very shameful indeed.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ