How many provinces?

The question of creating new provinces is no longer why, but how and when?


Dr Pervez Tahir April 28, 2011

Economic neglect and social deprivation invariably sow the seeds of separation. Ironically, the separatist sentiment achieves political maturity only when the neglect is recognised for redressal, which is always too late. The promise of removing inter-wing disparity to East Pakistan in the 60s and the recent focus on development in southern Punjab exemplifies this phenomenon. How quickly consensus can emerge on a subject as emotive as the creation of new provinces must surprise not just the diehard centralists but also the protagonists. In April 2010, the people of Hazara rose to demand a separate province. In that same month, in this column, this writer had stated that Hazara would show the way to others. Exactly a year on, the question of creating new provinces is no longer hurting the ‘Ideology of Pakistan’. Now the question is not why, but how and when?

It is no more a secret that the parliamentary committee on the Eighteenth Amendment had decided to steer clear of the issue — until the saber-rattling on renaming the NWFP. The N-League’s blunder in preferring Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (KP) to Hazara Pakhtunkhwa in order to dilute the ethnic connotation fired up the Hazarewals. Its continued stand on administrative convenience as the main justification for creating new provinces will backfire again. The same reasoning was advanced in favour of West Pakistan: It would economise on expenditure with one instead of four capitals. But the real objective was to submerge ethnicities and subvert East Pakistan’s weight, in terms of population. What was billed as a recipe to strengthen the federation turned out to be the exact opposite for the Pakistani nation. Far from improving administration, the restoration in Punjab of commissioners and deputy commissioners in the guise of district coordination officers has only alienated Bahawalpur and southern as well as northern Punjab. The former rulers of the now defunct princely state of Bahawalpur and their supporters are already mobilised and the Seraiki consensus is no more confined to intellectuals. All political leaders of southern Punjab now agree on a separate province. Ignoring this development will invite mass mobilisation. The silence in Potohar in Punjab is only a lull before the storm. Elsewhere, the residents of northern Balochistan have always found affinity with their counterparts in southern Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. The Punjab leadership should learn from the wisdom shown by Asfandyar Wali, who recognised the rights of the people of Hazara to wage a constitutional struggle. Talking of the constitution, the latest casualty to administrative convenience is the Fata package. There is only one way to mainstream the people of Fata: To ask them whether they want a province of their own or a merger with KP.

The Eighteenth Amendment showed respect to ethnic sensitivities by correcting the spellings of Balochistan and Sindh and changing the name of NWFP to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. However, the state continues to be defined by the four provinces, Islamabad being the capital territory and Fata with its unchanged name. There is even provision for accession by new territories. But there is no provision for the creation of new provinces except as an amendment to the Constitution. Indeed, it is even more difficult. Article 239(4) requires two-thirds majority not only in the parliament, but also in the concerned provincial assembly. In his note of reiteration, Senator SM Zafar had suggested simplification of this procedure “as in future, the redistribution of provinces into more provinces would be in the interest of Pakistan and the federation.” The time for this has come sooner than the senator might have thought. In no small measure, the ground for new provinces has been prepared by the persistent refusal of the political class to devolve power to the local level, which is the closest that a government can connect with the citizens for effective delivery. Perhaps a new social contract is emerging.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 29th, 2011.

COMMENTS (10)

Omer Farooq | 13 years ago | Reply Why not go for district system? Every district be allocated funds and look after development of its tehsils. That way, there won't be any problem which otherwise formation of provinces is posing especially the racial ones.
Abdul Mannan Lodhi | 13 years ago | Reply New Provinces. Every body in Pakistan is talking about the new provinces .Mostly in favour ,some against the change.But one thing is for sure.They are doing it not in the interest of Pakistan or the interest of the people of the area.They are raising this issue so as to get few seats in the assemblies for them.Firt rose the people of Hazara in support of the Hazara province .This they have done aginst the new name of the NWFP,the Khyber Pakhtoon Khawah. This ,the Hazarwi people considered based on ethnic affiliations of Pakhtoons and not taking into account the sensitivities of other people living in the same area.Hazarwis are patriotic people like their Pakhtoon brothers.It would have been better if their province was named HAZARA PAKHTOON KHAWAH. Had leades of Hazara and specially MLN pressed for it in time our Pakhtoon brothers would have agreed.In fact leaders of Hazara have always ignored the interest of the people of Hazara.If they spoke ,they have done it only in their own interes.It is only when some people rose against the name of KPK and sacrificed their lives,then only they started calling for the Hazara Province.Hazarwi people believe in the unity of Pakistan and their provinces .They do not like the divisions of the provinces on ethnic grounds.That was the reason for their oppositin to the new name of their province KPK. Why should they do themselves what they did not like for Pakhtoon brothers.Pakhtoons are nice people .All the ethnic people have been living in the KPK without any problems.Some times there might have been some grievances from one group or the other and it is natural.Why make a vey small province in Pkistan and not live together with others.When you want division of the provinces based on languages then some will want the division of our country on the same basis.Let us remain united and make our existing provinces and our beloved Pakistan strong.If some province is very big in area or in population and their people so desire such provinces could be divded in two parts or three but not provinces like Hazara.If the leaders of Hazara want to serve their people they can do so while living with their Pakhtoon brothers.If our Pakhtoon brothers have done some thing which is considered against the interest of our Pakistan let our brothers be happy.We must not do that.And the people of Hazara who sacrificed their lives they have done that against the ethnic based politics and not for it .Hazara people will sarifice for their Pakistan for their present province.We have been living with Pakhtoons and let us live together in future also.We are capable of solving our problems with mutual consultation.Those encouraging the division of provinces are in fact weakening them which is not in the interest of the people.People are not going to eat the provinces they want the solution of their problems and a respectanle place among the nations of the world.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ