- 05 May 2010
Ending FATA’s political isolation - 12 May 2010
Army operation in Fata (II) - 19 May 2010
PM promises special package for FATA - 29 May 2010
The need for reforms in FATA - 02 Jun 2010
PML-N backs Hazara province
The writer is currently writing a book, Taliban and Anti-Taliban ([email protected])
This article is in connection with the ongoing debate in this newspaper regarding whether Fata should be a separate province. Ayaz Wazir first wrote ‘Make Fata a province, too’ (April 30) and this was followed by a kind of rejoinder from Asad Munir (‘Fata should not be made a province’, May 4).
In Fata, there are three opinions in terms of its integration with the rest of the country. The first says that it should be made a separate province, the second that it should merge with Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and the third that it should stay as it is and that the Frontier Crimes Regulations (FCR) should be purged of their more anti-people provisions. In my view, the eventual route for Fata should be determined by the people of the region themselves without any pressure from outside. We always argue that the Kashmir issue must be resolved according to the wishes of the people of the area. So it would be hypocritical for us to support the Kashmiris’ right to self-determination and deny the same to the people of Fata.
There are mainly two suggestions related to reform. The first is that the Political Parties Act should be implemented in spirit and all parties should be allowed to campaign for votes in Fata and for this they should present their own ideas for legal, political, social and economic reforms. And the party that wins a majority of seats should then be given the mandate to implement this reform package. The second is that the same act be implemented by organising separate jirgas from each of the seven agencies. These jirgas should be elected and should, in turn, constitute a grand jirga at the Fata level. This grand jirga could act as a kind of ‘constituent assembly’ and it should be tasked with formulating a comprehensive reform package. This ‘assembly’ should also have women as well as minorities as members.
As for the police and the judiciary, the concern is whether residents of Fata can appeal to a higher court against, for example, police high-handedness. Right now they have no such means of seeking redressal and this is clearly an issue that our political parties need to address.
Based upon my extensive interaction with the people of Fata, it can be safely said that they want either a repeal of the FCR or, at the very least, major changes in it. They want to see all jihadis controlling Fata, whether local or foreign, pro-Pakistan or anti- Pakistan, crushed in target military operations. They also want the mainstream political parties of Pakistan to function in their area.
As a first step, the president of Pakistan – who has the authority to change the legal status of Fata – should promulgate the Political Parties Act in the area.
Published in the Express Tribune, May 15th, 2010.
More in KP & FATA
Shattered dreams
I agree. By banning the political discourse in FATA, and allowing the mullahs free use of the pulpit, we are only strengthening the extremists. As a first step, let the political parties operate in FATA.Recommend
der ala! well put.Recommend
How would we as a nation and the state insure that individuals would be able to vote in any referendum, or participate in any reform process without tribal or elder pressure? How would we protect women and insure that they are able to vote without being intimidated? I am not raising these points to deny political participation in FATA. Far from it, just that offering the framework for political participation is not enough, enabling a conducive environment to facilitate that participation must also go hand in hand. Recommend
The president of Pakistan with the support from the parties in power – should promulgate the Political Parties Act in FATA on war footing before the jingoistic establishment and the newly quarrelsome judiciary throw them away. This act of reform will pave the way for their earlier comeback just in case it happens. Recommend
I think the camparison between Kashmir and FATA is not correct. Kashmir is basically a religious issue between a religious and a secular state. Pakistan wants Kashmir because the majority of Kashmiries are Muslims. Therefore, its case is very weak because neither the secular India nor the international community at large is in favour of drawing borders based on religion.
As far as the status of FATA is concerned, logic needs to be followed. FATA is inhabited by Pakhtuns, and so is Pakhtunkhwa overwhelmingly. Therefore, no need of referendums. Referendums are conducted when there is some ambiguity about an issue. Therefore, FATA should straight-away be integrated with Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, and the same should be done with the Pakhtun majority areas of Baluchistan.Recommend
Fata should be made a separate province! ‘divide and rule’ policy should be adopted by our leaders so that the backward areas of our country can be streamlined.Recommend
The modus-operandi proposed by Farhat Taj for solving the complex of FATA is well thought and viable.
Jan NisarRecommend
Dear Farhat
You are right but this issue should not be taken as like of Kashmir. You know that Pakistani establishment has roots for last more than 63 years and it has corrupted the tribal society to the extent that i do not understand as to how they would be able to express their opinion on their own. First Pakistani establishment including Pakistan military should be expelled and under a sovereign international force the fata people should be asked either for referendum to jion Pakistan, Afghanistan, Independ or a seperate province of Pakistan or merger with Pashtunkhwa province. Now a new think tank regarding integration of FATA in pashtunkhwa province has been formed and their activities have started. As for as i understant its solution is to support this group because pashtun can not be seperated from one another. Tribal people and those living in province are one and same and thier unity is the need of hour.
Regards
Zar ali khan musazaiRecommend