Strategic error 2.0

Published: February 13, 2016
SHARES
Email
The writer is a barrister and human rights activist. She tweets @AlizehIHaider

The writer is a barrister and human rights activist. She tweets @AlizehIHaider

Wasil Ahmad, an Afghan boy, just 10 years of age, was killed by the Taliban last week. Wasil’s uncle Samad was the commander of a 70-strong militia group, part of the so-called Afghan Local Police, which is the Afghan government’s frontline militia group backed by the US government. When Samad was injured in a Taliban attack, Wasil had taken over the command from his uncle and successfully led his militia against the Taliban for 44 days. This was termed a miracle and Wasil was hailed a hero by the Afghan government. Events were held at the police headquarters to honour his bravery, and medals and money were distributed. There were a few sane voices, like Mohammad Karim Khadimzai’s, the provincial council chief of Oruzgan who pleaded that “instead of encouraging him to military activities that will ruin his future, let him go to school. He is too young to hand him a gun.”

Wasil was subsequently shot in the head by the Taliban when he left his home to buy vegetables. His murder brings to attention the continuing nefarious practice of states sourcing civilians, including children, as proxy soldiers. It is clear that the US and its allies have learnt little from past mistakes in the region. Across the border, Pakistan appears to be treading down the same path, encouraging the arming of civilians, training them in the use of lethal weapons and making them its foot soldiers. After the attacks on APS and BKU, the government has encouraged the training of teachers and students in the use of firearms and facilitated the provision of gun licences. It appears that the government’s ingenious strategy for fighting terrorist attacks on schools is to turn the very teachers and students it should be protecting into its frontline foot soldiers.

The manner in which the state eulogises children murdered by terrorists, be it Aitzaz Hasan or the APS and BKU students, and then encourages the handling of ammunition by civilians, what dangerous message is it conveying to society? Mohammad Ali Jinnah, addressing the Constituent Assembly in 1947, said, “You will no doubt agree with me that the first duty of the government is to maintain law and order so that the life, property and religious beliefs of its subjects are fully protected by the state.”

How, I ask, can the state abdicate its primary responsibility and still assume legitimacy? Syed Hamid Hussain may have bravely confronted the militants to protect his students at BKU, but the role he performed was not his to play. This was the duty of the state, our security forces and law-enforcement agencies, which are under oath to protect us. We condemn children being used as soldiers and suicide bombers by the Taliban, yet we now appear to be thrusting guns into the hands of our own teachers and students and justify this as a necessary ‘security measure’. At a time when the US is witnessing raging debates over stricter gun control laws, our government is easing accessibility to guns and ammunition. Instead of de-weaponising society, it is being infused with more of what ails us.

If there is one lesson we ought to have learnt from our previous misadventures in the realm of proxy wars is that guns are best suited in the hands of soldiers. Those soldiers who are bound by a code and oath to serve and protect their country and its people and are answerable for their actions; and not in the hands of civilians who may appear a convenient and pliant ‘resource’ but, over time, morph into an elusive yet formidable force that cannot be held accountable and soon enough take on an identity of their own, turning guns on our children.

Based on the testimonies extracted from alleged corroborators of the BKU attack, it is clear that what caused the terrorists to abandon their plans to attack other locations and choose BKU instead was the inaccessibility of those other target locations due to the increased presence of law-enforcement agencies and heightened security measures around them. Before policymakers move any further in encouraging the use of guns by civilians, they should be reminded of their aspiration to see books in the hands of our enemy’s children. How then, can they justify handing over guns to our teachers and students?

Published in The Express Tribune, February 14th, 2016.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Reader Comments (8)

  • Parvez
    Feb 14, 2016 - 12:31AM

    Very sensible and succinctly explained. The reason we make such basic glaring errors is explained by the observation made by a British diplomat in Karachi years ago when he said this country will be run by semi educated, semi literate, mostly inept leaders. Recommend

  • saim
    Feb 14, 2016 - 9:14AM

    Valid points raised by the writer, it is our extreme bad luck that those who are responsible to protect us are busy in real state and other businesses and ordinary public has no option other than to take arms for their own safety.Recommend

  • ahsan
    Feb 14, 2016 - 9:43AM

    A typical drawing room gossip article, advocating ban on self defense in the face of an utter failure by state institutions to protect the public against terrorists, who incidentally were raised and trained by the same state institutions. Recommend

  • Feb 14, 2016 - 10:51AM

    why is gun lobby so powerful in America?why are Jewish settlers allowed to carry automatic guns around for their protection?are the United States and Israeli forces not strong enough to stand up to the enemies of the State?we should have community policing and yes community may have to protect itself,do you think people in KP keep guns for the heck of it,no my dear its the requirement due to the security situation with Peshawar surrounded on three sides by tribal area and free movement of Afghans kuchis before and refugees after 1979Recommend

  • Pradeep
    Feb 14, 2016 - 11:41AM

    Remember the famous statement? “The state should have a monopoly on violence”. Arming civilians is a surefire way of the state shooting itself in the foot.Recommend

  • rex minor
    Feb 14, 2016 - 11:45AM

    There are no military solutions to the problems that Pakistan is facing at present. It must decolonise and only then it will be able to appreciate human values imbedded in the ideology of the Ibrahimic faith.
    A dialogue and reconciliation and not confrontatio and guns is the only course towards civilization.

    Rex minorRecommend

  • Rex Minor
    Feb 14, 2016 - 7:34PM

    @naveed:

    why is gun lobby so powerful in America?why are Jewish settlers allowed to carry automatic guns around for their protection?are the United States and Israeli forces not strong enough to stand up to the enemies of the State?

    What is acquired by force can only be conserved by force! The two countries that you mentioned fall squarely into this category. Besides there is no such thing as gun lobby but the USA constitution
    which the administration has been trying to reinterpret.

    Rex MinorRecommend

  • Ali
    Jun 26, 2016 - 5:59AM

    I don’t agree the writer condemning Syed Hamid Hussain’s action. When life is at stake, our primitive “flight or fight response” kicks in. If you, the writer, opted to flee the scene can’t be generalized and expected from everyone else. Remember “Aitzaz Hasan”-the boy who stopped the suicide bomber by holding him. Recommend

More in Opinion