How Modi’s hard line on Pakistan unravelled

Modi finally realised that a fire-and-brimstone approach to diplomacy doesn’t work. Better late than never


Hasan Suroor January 01, 2016
The writer is a former Press Fellow at Wolfson College, Cambridge University and is editor of the book, Making Sense of Modi’s India to be published by HarperCollins (India) this month. He has also worked as the UK correspondent of The Hindu

Acrucial test of the success or failure of India’s foreign policies under any government, regardless of its political complexion, has always depended on how it handles relations with Pakistan. And successive governments in New Delhi — the Congress as well as the BJP’s — have been aware of the risks of failing this test; and the consequences of failure. You can get away with messing up elsewhere, but if you don’t get it right on Pakistan, there is no place to hide. There is certain ‘exceptionalism’ about India-Pakistan relations, rooted in the history of the two countries and their cheek-by-jowl geographical proximity, which puts them in a league of their own.

And those on either side of the border who fail to take account of the exceptional dynamics of this relationship or wilfully refuse to acknowledge it may be able to earn cheap popularity in the short term, but ultimately they are forced to realise their folly. As the Narendra Modi government has now done so in recent days. Modi spectacularly failed the crucial ‘Pakistan test of Indian diplomacy’ in an attempt to appease his jingoistic supporters — not to mention the RSS which has pathological aversion to Pakistan — and that did win him some canned applause from his acolytes. And then?

And then reality caught up with the make-believe world of machoism, forcing the Indian prime minister to abandon his ill-advised hard line, whereby he vowed not to talk to Pakistan unless it brought the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks to justice. Later, other issues were brought in. But we’ll come to those in a bit. Breaking off the Composite Dialogue with Islamabad was advertised as ‘punishing’ it for its alleged intransigence as though Pakistan alone stood to benefit from normalisation of relations.

The decision to resume the stalled talks under a new title — the Comprehensive Bilateral Dialogue, a nod to Delhi’s pretence that it is not the same old Composite Dialogue it had so haughtily rubbished — is a triumph of sensible, old-fashioned diplomacy over ideological expediency. It is recognition that in the long run there is no substitute for a dialogue, especially with a neighbour.

Under Modi, relations with Pakistan had plummeted to a new low. Within weeks of coming to power 18 months ago, he cancelled scheduled talks between the two countries’ foreign secretaries, objecting to the Pakistan high commissioner meeting the Kashmiri separatist leader, Shabir Shah, ahead of the talks.

More recently in September, talks between the National Security Advisers were called off amid acrimony, with India effectively barring Sartaj Aziz from meeting Hurriyat leaders, and insisting that the talks must be restricted to terrorism. Pakistan said it would not accept any preconditions and favoured an “open agenda”.

Modi came to power accusing the previous Congress-led government of being “soft” on Pakistan and promising a harder line. He didn’t just stop there. He took to denouncing peaceniks as anti-national. It was this calculated election rhetoric that he attempted to translate into action in government, belying the more sensible expectations that once in power he would be forced to temper it.

Finally, however, he realised that a fire-and-brimstone approach to diplomacy doesn’t work; it took him rather long to come to terms with the demands of good diplomacy and realities of international relations. But, better late than never.

Now that the peace process is back on track, it is important that leaders in both countries resist attempts to sabotage it for short-term populism. There are still too many jingoists on the loose who would seek to disrupt the resumed peace effort. Modi and Nawaz Sharif have a historic responsibility to ensure that such elements are kept at arm’s length. They must remember that their own legacy is at stake here.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 2nd, 2016.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (9)

Anantula jaikrishna | 8 years ago | Reply For many and all those who oppose Modi for unholy reasons the narration sounds a true understanding of the handling Pakistan issue. But here Hasan Saroor is missing to acknowledge the strong decisive character of Modi absent in all previous PMs of congress. Secondly Modi while playing his cards in a mostly confusing manner truly wants peace with neighbors but not at the cost of our prestige. The author along with others only have to wait how Modi plays decisively his role if they understand his conviction in himself and his people. Mean while these and some such journalists will make hay.
Anantula jaikrishna | 8 years ago | Reply For many and especially anti Modi characters narration sounds close to the truth. But what Hasan Saroor missing here is the strong character of Modi absent in all the Prime Misters of congress who were at the helm. No doubt he will play his cards in such a way to confuse media.and also truly wants peace with neighbors . Modi will ultimately prove a decisive PM and will be appreciated even by Pakistan. Meanwhile the journalists can
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ