Pakistan lends no support to Austria’s anti-nuclear weapons treaty in UN

Austria, backed by 159 nations, calls for ban on nuclear weapons because of their catastrophic humanitarian effects


Reuters April 29, 2015
PHOTO: FILE

UNITED NATIONS: Austria on Tuesday called for banning nuclear weapons because of their catastrophic humanitarian effects, an initiative it said now has the backing of 159 countries, however, Pakistan – which possesses nuclear weapons – is not listed as supporter of the initiative.

"The only way to guarantee that nuclear weapons will never be used again is through their total elimination," Austrian Foreign Minister Sebastian Kurz told the 191 parties to the treaty, the world's benchmark arms control accord. "All states share the responsibility to prevent the use of nuclear weapons."

Kurz was speaking at the five-year review conference of the 1970 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

Diplomats from the 159 countries supporting the ban, presented ahead of the 70th anniversary of the US atom bombs dropped on Japan, said the initiative was modelled on successful campaigns to ban land mines and other weapons and could take years to move forward.

The initiative has virtually no support among NPT nuclear weapons states and veto-wielding Security Council members - the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China - or the countries of NATO, an alliance that provides a kind of "nuclear umbrella" security guarantee for its members.

But most of the 193 UN members back it.

The five permanent Security Council members signed the NPT as nuclear weapons states, although the pact calls on them to negotiate the reduction and eventual elimination of their arms caches. Non-nuclear states complain that there have been too few steps toward nuclear disarmament.

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif on Monday demanded countries possessing nuclear weapons scrap any plans to modernize their arsenals.

Four other states presumed to have nuclear weapons - Israel, Pakistan, India and North Korea - are not listed as supporters of the initiative.

Iran, accused by Western powers of developing a nuclear weapons capability under cover of a civilian programme, says its programme is peaceful. It is in talks with six world powers to curb sensitive nuclear work in exchange for sanctions relief. Tehran supports the Austrian initiative.

Without any explanation, Zarif, who on Monday spoke on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement, cancelled a planned speech in his national capacity on Tuesday morning as news broke of Iran's seizure of a cargo ship in the Gulf.

"Zarif decided that he did not have much to add to the NAM statement he gave on Monday. Hence it was decided not to give a national statement," a diplomat at the conference told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

COMMENTS (7)

Nadia | 9 years ago | Reply The irony which is continuously been the reason of failure in non-proliferation or anti-nuclear efforts is the double standards of major states. This can also be called as preference of national interests over global. The very advocates of disarming or abolition of nuclear weapons are the very ones which extend nuclear cooperation to non-signatory NPT state India which is a Defacto nuclear weapon states. At present, there are USA, France, Australia and Canada in close nuclear cooperation with India. Why anti-nuclear initiators highlighted this vivid nuclear proliferation in India which are actually triggered by major powers and make mockery of nuclear laws.
Sulman | 9 years ago | Reply As long as great powers keep massive nuclear weapons and fissile material stocks, Austria's plea for nuclear disarmament seems distant cry. Currently US and Russia holds maximum nuclear weapons and other smaller states are increasing their nuclear arsenal. Pakistan will support global disarmament if implemented equally to all nuclear powers. The country specific nuclear agreements seems biggest hurdle for global disarmament.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ