Pakistani Sikhs pledge to get Guru Nanak's 'chakki' back from UK

Millstone was allegedly taken away by UK-based Sikh a decade ago from Gurdwara Chakki Sahib in Punjab town


Web Desk March 31, 2015
A Sikh pilgrim prays at the mausoleum of Maharaja Ranjit Singh during commemorations for his 175th death anniversary in Lahore on June 29, 2014. PHOTO: AFP

AMRITSAR: Pakistani Sikhs have decided to start an international campaign to get Guru Nanak’s hand-run chakki (millstone) moved back from the UK.

The chakki, said to have been used by the founder of Sikhism and the first of the Sikh Gurus, was allegedly taken away by a UK-based Sikh from Gurdwara Chakki Sahib in Eminabad, a town in Punjab, about a decade ago.

Read: Super Sikh: A Taliban-fighting, Elvis-loving, multicultural hero

“We have approached almost every authority but to no avail,” Chater Singh, a member of Bibi Nanki Trust Pakistan, told the Times of India, adding that it was unfortunate that the chakki that Gurdwara Chakki Sahib was famous for was not in the temple anymore.

Read: US school children racially abuse Sikh boy, call him a 'terrorist'

Former president of Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee (DSGMC) Paramjit Singh Sarna confirmed that the chakki was in possession of a Sikh individual from the UK.

 

Read: British army considers creating Sikh regiment: report

He further said that if the chakki could not be kept under security at the Eminabad temple then it should be placed in the museum of Gurdwara Janamasthan at Nankana Sahib in Punjab.

Read: Americans still confusing Sikhs for Muslims: study

 

Sarna said Sikhs in Pakistan may have been unaware of the significance of  the historical article. He said Shiromani Akali Dal (Delhi) had appealed to the UK-based Sikh to return the millstone.

This story originally appeared on Times of India.

COMMENTS (1)

Pir | 8 years ago | Reply Once you get it, please get me some chakki da aata, would you?
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ