The application was filed by the senators of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) in 1997, and was dismissed today due to the absence of prosecution at the court hearing.
Chief Justice of Pakistan Nasirul Mulk declared the application ineffective.
Recently, a Supreme Court bench had also rejected the government’s plea for dismissal of an application seeking disqualification of the PM and referred the case, including three similar petitions, to the country’s chief justice.
COMMENTS (11)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Who controls the prosecution? The government, and who is in power now?
The reason for the dismissal is indeed funny and shows the grounds on which our courts make decisions else no decisions or life long pending.
"absence of prosecution at the court hearing"
The question is that why did it take 17 years to hear & decide the case? Speaks volumes of the effacacy of the court.
HL should say "17 year old" not "17 years old"
@roadkashehzada: would you like to corelate this news with your comment, please.....????
@admin: please approve only those comments that are relevant to the topic, and this ought to be written while individuals are commenting..
sharif courts so sharif
Nawaz is on Power so he through the institutions; he not only make himself clean and clear but he also doing to buried Zardari's corruptions & malpractices
PTI proving again and again that it wants to take the country back to politics of confrontation of 90s
17 years for decision on Prime Minister. I should wait patiently as i am a mango-man and my civil offence is in court for only 9 years. I am now 45 and sincerely hope my cases comes up for hearing and decision by the time I am 65. life expectancy of pakistani male is 65.5 years so I can enjoy my liberties again at least fr 6 months before i die.
Lol , has supreme court that much time to even consider irrelevant applications ?
Monkeys can provide better justice then these criminals calling themselves "honourable" judges