Pakistan remains hopeful of strengthening ties with India despite an angry New Delhi cancelled scheduled talks between the neighbours, Pakistan’s high commissioner Abdul Basit said on Wednesday.
Pakistan is confident of “overcoming this setback” after Delhi called off the diplomatic talks in Islamabad in a blow to warmer ties between the new Indian government and Islamabad.
Basit also defended his meetings with Kashmiri separatist leaders earlier this week, a move that prompted Delhi to accuse Islamabad of interfering in its domestic affairs and cancel the talks.
“We believe Kashmiris are a stakeholder in this (diplomatic) process,” Basit told reporters in the Indian capital, explaining that the meetings with the separatists were a longstanding practice.
“We will not allow the process (of stronger ties) to be distracted in any way,” he said, adding, “You will find Pakistan seriously committed to the process [...] and we attach enormous importance to our relations with India.” “There is no reason why we should lose hope of a strong bilateral relationship,” he said.
He also said that Pakistan appreciated Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s August 15 speech that called for greater cooperation among Saarc member states. “Sky is the limit if SAARC is vitalised.”
Asked whether there was any possibility of a meeting between Modi and his Pakistani counterpart in New York on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly next month, Basit said it would be wrong to speculate anything at the moment.
On the ceasefire violations along the LoC, Basit said as per Pakistani side, there have been 57 alleged border violations by the Indian troops since July 2013 for which Pakistan had served a demarche. Last month, the two countries scheduled talks between their foreign secretaries for August 25.
Earlier on Tuesday, Congress leader Manishankar Aiyar had described India’s decision to call off talks as “childish” and “petulant”. But on Wednesday, Indian spokesperson S Akbaruddin slammed Basit’s statement, saying that “after 1972 and the signing of the Simla Agreement, there are only two “stakeholders” on the issue of Jammu & Kashmir – the Union of India and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. This is a principle, which is the bedrock of our bilateral relations. This was reaffirmed in the Lahore Declaration of 1999 between PM Nawaz Sharif and then PM Vajpayee”.
Modi’s surprise move to invite his Pakistani counterpart, Nawaz Sharif, to his swearing-in ceremony in May had spurred hopes that peace talks between the two countries could resume.
The warmer ties were dented last week when Modi accused Islamabad of waging a “proxy war” by sending militants to attack Indian targets. Moreover, there have also been several ceasefire violations across the working boundary as well as the Line of Control (LoC).
The United States earlier this week had termed the cancellation of the talks disappointing.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 21st, 2014.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@at baby doll Mein zehar di. Brazil Spain, Australia do not hate muslims. That's in your head. Even if they do they hate us they are 1000 times better then people like you or the Right wing Hindus Indians. (Btw I love secular non hating hundus). So let's not not talk to India at all.
For my indian ignorant writers Kashmir is internationally recognized disputed unsolved issue, still on security council agenda.United nations peace keeping forces are present on the line of control in Kashmir doing their duties till todate. Kashmir issue was taken to United Nations by Mr. Nehru ( first indian prime minister) & promised to implement security council resolution for right of self determination . So please don't believe in what indian text books are misguiding the ignorant new generation of Indians . Neither Balochistan nor Chinese Muslim majority province is declared as disputed by United Nations.Kashmiris are fighting for their destiny & Pakistani nation is whole heatedly with them in their struggle .
How can seperatist be consulted in bilateral talks between two eleced Goverments of India & Pakistan. This common sense Pak seems to be lacking. Can India then invite Balochistan seperatists for talks before the meeting? Did Nawaz Sharif talk to 'Ughir' Chinese rebels before talking to Chinese leadership? Stop playing these childish games and act like professionals or don't havesuch talks at all and maintain status quo. Also if Pak insists on talking to separatists then why not with displaced Kashmiri brahmins also? If they are haping on a plebisite in Kashmir the condition in full of Kashmir should be like 1947 when Kashmiri Bramhins were also present in large numbers. Otherwise it'll be a wrong plebisite. For Pakistan all terrorists are non-state actors then what about Kashmir seperatists? Are they not responsible for such acts? Is Pakistan looking at the right picture.
@ Sialkotwala
Haha..I agree with your analysis.
@hasan ansari: Brazil Spain, Australia hate muslims.
@hasan ansari " Brazil Spain, Indonesia, Australia" Sure who is stopping you go ahead if you are so capable
“cancelling the meeting was an over-reaction on India’s part, especially when it could have served as an opportunity to discuss grievances and press for a solution.” http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/20/opinion/prime-minister-modi-fumbles-on-pakistan.html?emc=edittnt20140819&nlid=1837464&tntemail0=y&_r=1
@hasan ansari: Brazil Spain, Indonesia, Australia...Hmm. Good Luck!
@hasan ansari Beggars cant be choosers
@Sialkot wala: I agree. I don't think the HCs of the two countries can act without instructions. HC Basit is probably getting mixed messages from Islamabad. He is now doing his best to play down the whole incident, watching what opinion makers are saying about GOI's move. While op-ed writers are divided, a Times of India survey revealed 90% of those asked supported the Government. Separately, the Army in Pakistan has reminded Nawaz Sharif who is the real boss in that country. In the sub-continent, crowds of 30-40,000 are, otherwise, easily disbursed.
@Moron: You are EXACTLY what your name implies. He was told to do this. By the powers that be. He did not do it on his own. He can do nothing on his own. Except go to the bathroom. Get it? The Army wanted this. And so it was done. Nawaz and Shahbaz are nothing now. Just pen pushers.
Why is India intent on denying Kashmiris a voice? Are you afraid we will convince the world to support us? Are you afraid we will join Pakistan?
It is our land, our people, and our future No one can control or bully the Kashmiri nation. We will decide our own destiny.
We really don't need to talk to them. Who cares about them. Look else where please. Enough !
Can we stop acting like a love starved puppy and just pull the curtain on India. It's no use talking or trying to talk. Let's try talking to countries which is worth talking to and we haven't talked much with them - Brazil, Spain, Indonesia, Australia. Bye Bye India. Good riddance ! By the way we got a snob hat now and that position is taken.
Next logical step would be to declare this high commissioner person non grata and ask him to leave India.
Pakistan inadvertently helped destroy APHC. Thank you.
Abdul Basit commited a blunder. A diplomat who doesn't know diplomacy... single handedly derailed the Govt.s peace talks. Mr.Basit,when you are in Pakistan,pls. invite Separatist leaders to your place in Pakistan for chai-biscuit...don't do such nonsense on foreign soil and abuse a foreign county's hospitality. Pakistan-pls. send a diplomat,who knows diplomacy.
The Kashmir separatists are not even a political party. They do not represent Jammu and Kashmir people. They cannot be a stakeholder. Even the Congress leaders were upset with the India government for their secretarial meeting with Pakistan. Mr.Ayar may be speaking his personal views. India should take a lesson from China how it is solving its separation problem in Xinjiang, the Muslim majority province.