According to the Free Dictionary, a victim is ‘an unfortunate person who suffers from some adverse circumstance’. Considering this definition, a victim is a perpetual sufferer. Even if this definition is deemed inaccurate, the word ‘victim’ surely implies continued suffering and passivity. Of course, rape is a suffering. But is it justified to rob a person of their ability to fight back by constantly reminding them that they are a victim? Perhaps it is this labelling that does not allow the sufferers to move on and they spend the rest of their lives in grief and a lack of self-esteem. The point is the tragedy of rape was a one-time incident while using the word ‘victim’ is a label for the sufferer for a lifetime. Sufferers might want to forget the tragic incident but the label does not let them.
Instead, we can call them ‘survivors’. A survivor is a person ‘who copes well with difficulties in their life despite hardships’. It is a relatively positive term and should be used to replace ‘victim’ everywhere to help the sufferers normalise their disturbed states and become strong.
Rape survivors already undergo a bitter ordeal, especially in a conservative society like that of Pakistan. They blame themselves and think that perhaps they did something to encourage the perpetrator. Loaded or vague language used by the media often suggests that perhaps, it is the survivor who is to be blamed, while in reality, they are never to be blamed. It is our duty as responsible citizens, and more as journalists, to do everything in our capacity to ensure the survivors a safe future. It may sound absurd to some. They might ask ‘What difference does a word make?’ But surely, words make a lot of difference especially when they label someone. We do not want the rape survivors to live up to the label of a ‘victim’. It is high time we realise our responsibility and pledge to eradicate a word as loaded as ‘victim’ from our vocabularies.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 16th, 2014.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
UN Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power Adopted by General Assembly resolution 40/34 of 29 November 1985
"Victims" means persons who, individually or collectively, have suffered harm, including physical or mental injury, emotional suffering, economic loss or substantial impairment of their fundamental rights, through acts or omissions that are in violation of criminal laws operative within Member States, including those laws proscribing criminal abuse of power.
@ Liaqut Karim I think that was the point of the author. and not calling them victim is the first step towards it.
I agree with your wonderful thoughts,
Seems impractical. Practically they are perpetual sufferers in the society. they are tortured by the society even years after the incidents. You dont want to call them victims? change the way people treat them else they are victims for me.