Now, the ground operation is underway. Surprisingly though, there has been little resistance from the militants thus far. And they might not put up a stiff fight for more than one reason.
First, the TTP has been weakened by splits and infighting. Its emir, Mullah Fazlullah, who is operating from safe havens in the northern Afghan province of Kunar, couldn’t ward off centrifugal trends plaguing the umbrella group since the death of his predecessor, Hakimullah Mehsud. Fazlullah’s authority eroded: a) because he was missing from the war theatre, and b) because some senior cadres were unhappy with his ascendency. Traditionally, the TTP leadership remained exclusively with the Mehsud tribe, which provides the bulk of foot soldiers to the group. When Khan Said, aka Sajna, the commander of TTP’s Waliur Rehman group, took over the group’s command in South Waziristan, his rival Sheheryar Mehsud of the Hakimullah faction didn’t acquiesce. The tug of war turned violent and the two factions fought bloody battles for nearly three months. Finally, Fazlullah stepped in to stop the infighting. He replaced Sajna with Khalid Sheikh Haqqani, but the former refused to submit. And the TTP fell apart. Sajna and his men walked away, accusing the group of criminality.
Second, TTP militants rely on guerilla tactics or asymmetric warfare. They fight at night, target the military’s supply lines with homemade bombs, mount suicide attacks on military checkpoints, or ambush troops in the treacherous mountainous terrain. They know they cannot take on the technologically, numerically, and professionally superior security forces in open combat. Realising their weakness, some of their fighters might have fled into neighbouring Afghanistan or gone into hiding.
Third, the military has significantly damaged the Taliban infrastructure with precision air strikes and heavy artillery in the run-up to the ground operation. Dozens of hideouts have been decimated in the bombing campaign since June 15 or even before that. Fourth, Hafiz Gul Bahadur of Shura-e-Mujahideen, North Waziristan, is not aligned with the TTP. He played host to the Haqqani network, likeminded TTP factions and Middle Eastern militants. They all have focused their energies on fighting US-led foreign troops in Afghanistan. Bahadur’s group had been at peace with the government until June 10 when he accused the government of reneging on a peace agreement the two sides had forged in 2007. After initial belligerent statements, he said his group wouldn’t fight at least during the month of Ramazan. Similarly, the group of Mullah Nazir, now led by his successor Bahawal Khan, aka Salahuddin Ayubi, is allied with Bahadur. Their stronghold was Wana, South Waziristan, and they acted as a counterweight to the TTP in the region. Maulvi Nazir, who died in a US drone strike last year, had successfully driven out fighters of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan from Wana after a deadly battle in 2007. Reportedly, the groups of Bahadur, Ayubi and the Haqqani Network might have slipped into Afghanistan, probably into the Khost province.
This provides sufficient grounds to believe that it wouldn’t be a high-casualty war. But the military might not have a walkover either. Some die-hard militants might be waiting in hiding for the military’s supply line to stretch out before launching sporadic counter-attacks. Nonetheless, the military is likely to re-establish the writ of the state in North Waziristan in weeks, not months.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 9th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (14)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
ET : rebuttal, please post @Assad - Who said air strikes are on “local population”? The local population was asked to leave and the attacks are precision attacks after many hours of recce and observation done on what is going on at these locations.
Don't you think the above is contraidictory? If the attacks are indeed precision, why were the locals asked to leave? And imagine if you are a local - how would you like to be told to pack whatever you can and leave your home - possibly forever! Which is why you need boots on the ground - and that too in a massive number. Boots on the ground can go about securing and holding areas; house to house if required. Something air-power can never do!
...there are more than ample experts of COIN sitting in the Pakistan Army ...
Unfortunately Pakistan Army's record on COIN has been far from exemplary! They've had operations here and there; but never seem to hold territory. And when the operations are launched, they are done with much fanfare in advance, allowing the insurgents to slip out and slip back in when the PA vacates the territory - so it is only the civilians who bear the brunt. And what efforts have the PA or the govt taken to ensure economic and social development after a military operation in those areas so the locals don't need to resort to insurgency? And Iraq and Afghanistan are prime examples of how NOT to conduct a successful COIN!
@3rdRockFromTheSun: Who said air strikes are on "local population"? The local population was asked to leave and the attacks are precision attacks after many hours of recce and observation done on what is going on at these locations. So this is not a case of blind carpet bombing by the PAF. The Air force is hitting these targets after observers on the ground call the strikes on these sites after meeting resistance from the militants.
As far as you teaching about COIN, there are more than ample experts of COIN sitting in the Pakistan Army currently who have studied what went on in Iraq and Afghanistan and how we carried out the operations in Swat and South Waziristan agency.
@Imran Jafri: This is not overconfidence. The Army going in will not stop terrorism, rather it will limit the space from which the TTP operate from. Anyone who thinks this will stop terrorism altogether in Pakistan is not being realistic.
However Pakistan cannot afford to leave the TTP free to operate from NWA. This is what this operation is doing. Its pushing the TTP out to Afghanistan or perhaps into the cities. So we have our work cut out in the cities. NWA, like South Waziristan has to be garrisoned by the military and FC so in the future foreign elements and the TTP elements cannot create a base for themselves in that area.
Air strikes on local populations as part of Counter Insurgency (COIN)? The first mistake as air strikes cause colateral damage which actually create more insurgency.
A COIN is a long term operation with the military part placing boots on the ground to eradicate the insurgents and then deny them the territory. The non-military part of winning hearts and minds & developing the affected areas takes longer and is the key to ensuring that insurgency does not return.
Your not getting significant resistance for the same reason you didn't get resistance in the S Waziristan offensive - you announce your offensive weeks in advance, allow a ready escape route, and are satisfied with moving rather than destroying your supposed "enemy".
As usual this report by western media is totally biased. They simply do not want Pakistan to prosper. This is their hidden agenda. Inshallah Pakistan army will succeed in flushing our these terrorist and agents of West and USA from Pakistan.
@Deepwater: Its a dose of rotten anti Pakistan soup! No facts. No figures. Just blame Pakistan for everything..
Best wishes to Pak military in their fight against TTP and their sympathisers. Question is: Just as some people tried to victimise Musharraf for a similar action in Lal Masjid, will a future regime try to victimise General Raheel Sharif as is the custom in Pakistan?
" ... the military is likely to re-establish the writ of the state in North Waziristan in weeks ..."
Does that mean the military will withdraw, civil administration be established, and the IDP's move back to their homes? Also, which Sharif represents "the state"?
Read this Christine Fair's post for a dose of reality: http://warontherocks.com/2014/07/the-pakistan-armys-foray-into-north-waziristan-get-used-to-disappointment/
The first mistake is believing this group is actually a military force, its is just a very large gang that uses terror for its political and monetary ends. Religion is only used for mobilization purposes and discarded during actual combat. In Mexico a gang called the Zetas have used very similar tactics, beheading, brutal killings etc except maybe suicide bombing to accomplish their goals. Mexico didn't use brute force such as fighter jets and bombers to kill or capture the leaders of this gang rather a well trained police force and a good investigations wing. Using extraordinary force like we are is not having the desired effect of eliminating the message this group propagates. Only by capturing their top leadership will we blunt their message, killing a few foot soldiers who have just dispersed is meaningless.
Actually over confidence will hurt us like whats happening in Iraq. There also country was declared terrorist free until they went into the desert reorganized and launched devastating attacks. There are backsides to having Taliban all over the place than in one place. Miltary cannot take this lightly