This was not just sloppy governance, this was incompetence on an epic scale. Pyramids. Hanging Gardens of Babylon. Colossus of Rhodes…you get the picture. It was not just the lack of joined up thinking it was the apparent absence of any cognitive process that was recognisable as governance in action. The tail wagged the dog and the world watched askance sniggering the while.
Why was this allowed to happen as it did? Was it just bumbling confusion on the day or something deeper, more systemic? I suppose it should have dawned on me years ago but never mind, it finally did this week. It is the lack of the skills of statecraft and the qualities that make a statesman at the top of our political trees which have institutionalised mediocrity at the highest level. It is the failure to mature in the bottom draws of the political wardrobe before taking power at the top tier. Statesmanship is learned at a hard school, but here it is a school that is circumvented and our leaders arrive at the top with little of substance behind their rhetoric.
To paraphrase Guergen writing in 1981, statesmanship enables a politician to undertake public enterprises, or influence them in a decisive manner. Those public enterprises advance the common wellbeing of the people. And here is the illuminating difference — for a politician to make the jump to statesman they have to demonstrate an awareness of the difference between a custodial leadership which merely administers the affairs of state, and a leadership that transforms them.
And what of statecraft and its associated skills? We tend to think of statecraft in terms of international activities conducted by diplomats, the economic tools and military might. It is about the ability to identify threats and opportunities, and use that knowledge to promote the interests of the state or protect it. Statecraft is a function not only of having the ‘tools of the trade’ but equally knowing how to use them; being able to identify the right objectives and the right purposes (‘right’ being a matter much open to debate in our purely local context). Ideally statecraft brings together both means and objectives. Anybody who can identify any of the above in play right across the Tahirul Qadri affair deserves a gold star. Form an orderly line at my front gate.
International perceptions of how the current government goes about its business will have been damaged. Our economic interests will have been very poorly served and our external communications even more so — airlines are ‘considering their position’ when it comes to the safety and security of the aircraft they fly into Pakistan and the passengers to whom they have a duty of care.
Passengers have rights, among them the right to sue the carrier if it fails to honour the contract represented by their ticket. The airline that had its operations considerably disrupted by the actions of our government may have a case in international law, and we await developments.
The entire episode was an object lesson in how to turn a drama into a crisis, a crisis that now threatens to plonk itself on the doorstep of a government that increasingly looks like it is in headless-chicken mode. Considering there are major military operations underway, over half a million internally displaced persons and now a confrontation with an enemy that has the capacity to take down a civil airliner at night using ground fire — it might be argued that this was not the best time to add fuel to political fires.
The last time Tahirul Qadri disturbed our slumbers he was accommodated, grudgingly perhaps but accommodated, and went on his way again leaving behind a few ripples and a large sanitation and public-health cleanup bill. This time a bravura performance in the foot-in-mouth and shot-in-both-feet departments is going to bequeath us all a rather different outcome. And it is going to end in tears, it really is.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 26th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Ranjha: Ever hear of no fly lists? Governments can put you on it without giving a reason. His passport could've been cancelled on several grounds: preserving public peace; hate speech. Take your pick. I'm sure Emirites will ban him now.
I don't support any political party. But I do know the people I don't like: Islamists, opportunists like Qadri, and fools like the great Khan.
A good read and perspective. However, a few facts of the past may give a different dimension to the subject analysis. Last time when Qadri Sb. came to the capital city, it was almost the curtains for the last Government as they were already in the last year of their tenure. Moreover, the Government was busy with certain matters with the Judiciary and no Operation was underway against the militants. The then reign holders were, and I am assuming on the basis of certain facts which were common knowledge, under no threats from any of the parliamentary or non-parliamentary forces for derailing the system. Also, the largest opposition party at that time had the maturity and sufficient intellect to not to sort to any undemocratic tools for cutting the parliaments life. Also we may not overlook the fact that coalition governments are more flexible and accommodating in their very nature due to lack of sense of muscle power (please do not take as lack of power). All these and many other minor/major matrices of power and intent to exercise the same contributed towards a rather deft response which was not less than what this Government offered in the recent days in any manner. I still remember military choppers flying very low over the crowded D-Chowk with clearly visible M60 machine guns on both sides. Currently the situation is completely different. Government is under pressure from all sides, both national and international. The efforts of the current Govt. to unify the regional powers by engaging with China, softening its outlook towards India, getting cozy with stans of central asia and hoping for a stable Afghanistan did not serve well in the overall context of international politics. Icing on the cake was leaking of news that Pakistan would be moving ahead with a defense deal with Russia after a soft node by India. If anything was left, the jigsaw was splendidly completed by initiating a dialogue between Iran and the middle east. Internally, the Government of PMLN faced a continued threat from the only other center-right party, i.e., PTI. The existential essential for PTI, strictly in the political theory sense, is to confront the other center-right party, which also carries the strength of incumbency and hails from the same region which PTI’s leadership thought of its happy hunting ground. If PTI would not confront (even only for the heck of it) it would melt and merge into PMLN. Such situation has propelled the hawks in PMLN to prevails in the initial part of the this TUQ drama. However, with the dust settling now, PMLN is getting soft and sensible about it. The inertia of hysterical response to chaos shall settle down with Ramadan coming a few days. Both sides have given the clear message of what they want. Qadri has opened all his card way to soon and any stepping back, even as small as going to visit his party workers with Governor Punjab, shall have a losing impact upon him. Government has started with muscle might but exposed the other side in Rawalpindi as well. I personally see this game going to Government by Eid. After Eid, we all shall be having the first winds of Autum and with them a Governor sipping hot soup at the balcony of KPK house and overlooking at the city preparing for by-elections in a couple of provincial constituencies of Peshawar.
@TooTrue:
Wow, you sound like a true democrat a la PMLN style? Under what charge/law can the government/airline not let the passenger board? And under what law would the GOP cancel is passport?
Watch out, we have wolves amongst the sheep dressed like sheep!
Sir, Look at the pedigree of our politicians. Did we really expect them to handle the situation any better then they did? Thing is, no one thinks they are accountable for anything.
I've said this before but will say it again.......over 30 years ago an astute British Embassy officer said ' ...from now on Pakistan will be run by semi-ilterate, semi honest, semi trained people and it will only get worse with time '.......what I added was that he left out ' fully corrupt ' The handling of the Qadri affair is as you rightly say a classic example of this.
Perhaps, it is the same mindset which the entire mindset is suffering from: being reactive instead of proactive. We wait for the things to happen and then heartlessly try to control the damages, and sadly NEVER learn from previous experiences !!
It could've been handled so simply. The government should have told the airline not to transport this individual to the country. The airline would've gladly obliged. They could also have cancelled his passport forcing him to use his Canadian documents, which would've required a Pakistani visa.
If all else failed let the silly, old man land in Islamabad. He should've been ignored.