A private member, who submits resolution in his personal capacity, has to give seven days’ notice and the resolution. PHOTO: APP/FILE
“A resolution is not binding on the government,” said former law minister Senator S M Zafar while talking to The Express Tribune.
Zafar added that resolutions do not have legal or constitutional value but they are important in the parliament since they are passed by elected representatives.
“Our track record is that resolutions are passed and then are thrown to dustbin.”
MNA Shazia Marri from the opposition Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) had moved a resolution saying “This House is of the opinion that the Government should take steps to lift [the] ban on YouTube.”
As the subject was related to every member, there was no vote against it and was passed unanimously.
YouTube had been blocked on September 17, 2012 after a sacrilegious clip grew in prominence. The clip drew sharp reaction from much of the Muslim world. Pakistan along with Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Sudan had blocked the site. While threats of blocking it forced YouTube to censor the video in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia. It took a court order in Brazil to block the video.
Earlier, a Senate committee on Human Rights had also approved a similar resolution seeking removal of ban from the videos sharing website.
The record of the National Assembly resolution for lifting ban on YouTube was 47th. The first resolution was passed on 16 June 2013 that condemned terrorist attack that targeting of Quaid e Azam’s Residency in Ziarat.
How is a resolution introduced in the House
The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the National Assembly 2007 define the entire process for introducing resolutions into the house.
“A resolution should be in the form of a declaration of opinion or a recommendation, or convey a message, or command, urge or request action, or call attention to a matter or situation for consideration by the government, or in such other form as the Speaker may consider appropriate.”
There are guidelines about the content of a resolution too. “It shall not (a) contain arguments, inferences, ironical expressions or defamatory statements (b) refer to the conduct or character of a person except in his official and public capacity (c) raise discussion which is detrimental to public interest (d) contain reflection on a judge of the supreme court or a high court or any subordinate court or (e) relate to any matter which is pending before the court.”
A private member, who submits resolution in his personal capacity, has to give seven days’ notice and the resolution. After going through the scanners and set procedures, is presented before the house for approval.
Rule 169 reads as “(1) ON the conclusion of the discussion, the speaker shall put the resolution or, as the case may be, the resolution amended, to the vote of the House and if Passed by the House, a copy thereof shall be forwarded to the Division concerned. (2) The Division concerned shall apprise the Assembly the action taken on the resolution within a period of six months from the date of communication by the Assembly Secretariat.”
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Heisenberg: That was a right thing to do.
Maybe it will take couple of months in convincing court about government and national assembly decision of opening it as per public demand. People needs to be a little patient.
@Parvez: "If that is the case…..then why do we spend millions on this useless institution ?" . The Europeans though have a longer tradition of making democratically anchored decisions, yet they too raise the same question. They keep getting their own share of Bread and Circus.
So what the senator is admitting to is that this whole charade of elections and assemblies is a farce. And that even if the whole parliment agrees on something it is meaningless. And the only rule in this coutry is the rule by the gun.
in modern world this is not the solution to ban a web site, because everyone like me watching youtube with proxy.how many web sites we will ban? I think we should response in logical way to condemn all racist material. we should show that we muslims are peace loving people and respect all nations and religions, not in statements but in action. we can avoid watching anti religion, anti any nation videos but we cant ban any web like youtube and others.
@Heisenberg: No one is forgetting. We are noticing how PMLN is following all the bad policies of the last government, on top of it's own mess.
Sanity is not binding on the PMLN government.
People always forget that YouTube was actually banned in PPP's govt, the secular one :D
If that is the case.....then why do we spend millions on this useless institution ?
Looks like youtube is banned forever! Waiting for the day government bans breathing.