Chetan Bhagat has over time become the JK Rowling of Bollywood. He may not be as creative, influencing an entire new wave of fantasy in the post-modern readers, but he has definitely polished the ‘Shining India’ theme for the modern readers and viewers. 3 Idiots saw a boy from a not-so-well-known background chasing smaller, but significant things in life instead of cramming up text books and eventually making his own empire out of it. Kai Po Che! on the other hand, was more direct and in sync with the ground realities of modern day capitalist India. It was a story of three friends and how their paths in life cross each other and social responsibilities make them question their relationship. The only friend who succeeds in achieving his dream is an entrepreneur, who always took calculated risks in life. The one who gets killed always took decisions rather impulsively (such as paying special attention to coaching a Muslim child).
This synchronisation of Bhagat’s narratives with a new spin on ‘Shining India’ gives film-makers enough room for creating an equally dramatic and inspirational experience. That is the reason why Bhagat should have restricted himself to writing books that ended up being adapted by film-makers and not writing books for the purpose of adaptation by film-makers. 2 States is a clear example of the latter and a major misfire from both Bhagat and the director Abhishek Varman.
The story begins with Krish (Arjun Kapoor), a Punjabi boy arguing with his friend Ananya (Alia Bhatt) who is a Tamil girl from Chennai about small matters such as the quality of food. From friends they become lovers and share the bed with each other — but that obviously has been edited out of the print that is running in Pakistani cinemas. To the misfortune of the film-maker, the intimate scenes are so abruptly edited by the censor board that it’ll take you sometime to figure out why the film seems so rushed and pointless in the first half hour.
Story moves on, but of course the arguments between the two leads remain, which in the larger picture represent the conflict between the Tamil culture and the Punjabi culture. However, right when it seems that the cultural conflict is essentially the hindrance between their marriage and also presumably the plot of the film, we find out that fathers from both the families also have psychological problems. All of this adds up to a rather stretched second half after a relatively engaging start to the story, which also had the most loosely performed song of the year Locha-e-Ulfat.
That does not overshadow the cultural conflict, which is established by a few very good one-liners such as when the Punjabi mom whines over the fact that her future daughter-in-law finished both of her juice packs.
However, the disappointing part of the film is that all such excitement and highs and lows are generated by the side characters, so much so, that it often seems that it’s only the families of the couple who are interested in putting up a show and not the couple itself.
Despite repeated attempts by Alia Bhatt to generate some sort of chemistry with Kapoor, boredom oozed out of every single frame that they shared together. Bhatt was consistently trying to infuse some sort of a reaction from Kapoor, who on the other hand remained timid and restricted throughout the narrative, which also proved to be the film’s fatal flaw.
The script was mediocre with its set of clichés such as the drunkard father, but even that could have been saved by a relatively talented male lead. Kapoor’s monotony is the film’s weakest link; after all he gets more screen time than Alia Bhatt and fails to make any use of it, apart from mimicking the not- very-talented Abhishek Bachan on several occasions.
Abhishek Verman needs to choose his actors wisely and Bhagat needs to think less like an extension of Bollywood and more like a novelist.
Verdict: 2 States is just a mediocre script that could have been saved by solid performances from the leads. It is a sort of film that is not worth buying a cinema ticket for, but rather, watch it to kill time, when it runs on cable.
Rating: 1.5/5
Published in The Express Tribune, April 23rd, 2014.
Like Life & Style on Facebook, follow @ETLifeandStyle on Twitter for the latest in fashion, gossip and entertainment.
COMMENTS (17)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Some have rightly said here that Pakistanis cannot understand multiculturalism. So far I had an idea that Pakistanis also have various cultures in their land. But this review proved that I have misunderstood Pakistanis. A person born in Mumbai in a tamil brahmin family, who grew up in Kolkata can understand and enjoy it. Most of India is like me. To me this movie is far better than Highway. Arjun Kapoor was far better than Rajdeep Hooda. May be Pakistanis like those types of characters and cannot appreciate soft characters. This critic mentions Alia Bhatt complaining about food but has not understood what the movie wants to say. She is relishing chicken and wants beer in Gujrat (where it is prohibited because it is the birth place of Mahatma Gandhi) and at the same time saying that she is from a pure vegetarian family. Other narratives in the movie, when they describe the punjabi homes, the furniture and even the inside of the homes with that in south India can be understood only by Indians. It was also laughable when Alia Bhatt's dad passes on when he was offered alcohol in front of others but enjoys it when his wife is not at home. I watched this movie with my American friends and they do not know any Indian language. They could follow only the sub-titles and were laughing and enjoying the movie thoroughly. They could understand the finer points that the movie has described not just in words and actions but also visually. They realized that every state of India is a country by itself, with cultures, attaire and habits that are so different. After the movie, we went to have some Indian beer and food at an Indian restaurant and I had time to boast with them that there are more than 100 languages in India, each with its own script and not just this but we also have different calendars in India and told them that we just had our new year in south India on April 14, whereas in the north they have it around October. I also boasted that Sanskrit the root language of many Indian languages is over 5000 years old. I think that this critic should not have attempted to review this movie with such a limited knowledge and experience.
Totally agree...it was just a waste of time. I had high expectations when I saw the trailer but the actual film disappointed me. The lead had a monotonous character and I saw no progress till the end.
Is this your first review?? Because it sucks. It was an average movie and the script is very good!! I think Chetan Bhagat is a very good novelist.
We should be making and watching films that are relevant to our culture. No Pakistanis will be able to relate with the story of this film.
@vikram: Remember what they did with East paksitanis Yes, I'm sure India did nothing in it.
i agree with Rafay Mahmood because arjun kapoor is not to the mark his perform not attrack the audience i thank varun dhawan is perfect for this role
Saw this movie and I want my money back!! Horrible acting by all except the character of hero's mum, she was the only one acting well in the movie. Hero was trying to copy abhishek bachpun who himself is not a good actor. I could not remember any song after coming out of the theatre as they were all very artificial and forgettable. I was expecting good work from Alya Bhut however she was having an off day in the whole movie. Locations are nothing exciting. Cinematography is pathetic. It looks like this film was shot on a shoe-string budget. I went to see this movie because I saw highway and was greatly impressed by Alya however this movie turned out to be a disappointment.
Kindly be kind enough to read the book before reviewing - There are hardly any movies who do justice to the book - this one does it. Your criticism is so immature.
Only Indians can understand the film. And I am Indian.
Saw the movie and I completely agree with this review. The movie is Bollywood's attempt to portray the 'westernized' part of their culture. nothing new.
Hmm. You haven't even tried to explain the north- south divide which the movie actually depicts. Poor review.
i think you dint get a chance to watch the movie yourself dearie :)
@Rationalist--Hey buddy ..The writer is a pakistani who like his countrymen are not aware of rich cultural diversity of India..Hence may be they would have found it boring..Pakistanis dont believe in cultural diversity..Remember what they did with East paksitanis
A bad review from a home made critic!!
Don't agree with this review at all. It is a very good movie and I enjoyed every minute of it.
Bias is smelled from each letter of this review. Just compare this review with other reviews for this movie. The reviewer certainty seems to be giving verdict based on his personal preferences, rather than the movie itself. ET please publish.