The murder trial of Muhammad Ahmed Khan had come to an end. The case was exceptional in many ways: it was not tried at the court of original jurisdiction, with the appellate forum, the Lahore High Court arrogating this jurisdiction. The bench trying the case was headed by the chief justice, who was accused by the defence of having possessed malice against the person standing trial, but he disregarded the objection. The split verdict drew a wedge between the judges belonging to Punjab and the rest of the country. An interesting point to note is that this case has never been cited in the history of criminal proceedings: no criminal lawyer or judge would feel comfortable to fall back on this case to support his brief or reasoning.
As we heard the sad news, we got hold of a transistor. There was a brief and terse account of Bhutto's execution and his burial at Garhi Khuda Bakhsh. Begum Nusrat Bhutto and her children were denied their right to be present at the funeral. An eventful era of Pakistan's history had reached its finale. A trail of events started eddying in my mind — ZAB's meteoric rise, his controversial role in the East Pakistan debacle and assumption of power after the country’s break-up, all fell in place to complete the picture. From here onwards, he picked up the pieces, made strenuous efforts to retrieve the areas occupied by India during the 1971 war as well as brought back prisoners of war, rallied the Muslim world around and set a domestic agenda of reforms, which though, highly controversial, could not be ignored. The common man developed confidence and a sense of empowerment. The tiller of the soil could drag a landowner to a court of law. Ejectment of a tenant was no more an easy affair. While framing the 1973 Constitution, he emerged as a man of consensus: he gave the country a document, which is still the rallying point for this highly polarised and fractured nation. However, there were question marks on his style of governance, which squeezed the political space for his detractors. His conduct often smacked of high-handedness.
ZAB was, however, a people's man and thrived amongst the milling crowds. He was everywhere when the chips were down: in the earthquake-hit areas of Bisham in the Northern Areas to the collapse of a high-rise building in Karachi, from the flood-ravaged areas of Shujabad to the famine-stricken expanses of Thar, he was omnipresent.
On the international front, he did not fall prey to the temptation of piling up heaps of MoUs like our successive rulers. His real focus was on the Gulf and the Middle East, which opened vast avenues of employment opportunities for the Pakistani workforce. Within no time, our remittances were touching the $3 billion mark, far exceeding those of India.
ZAB possessed an empathetic chord and a hands-on approach to problems, unlike most of our rulers. As an under-training officer, I recall a petition of an old man that was marked for the deputy commissioner with a hand-written note in the margin by the prime minister. He had penned, “Retrieve his agony, he is running around from pillar to post.” The old man did get what he wanted, while many of us in our early years of service enjoyed the idiomatic directives of ZAB.
Ziaul Haq's government had been keen on getting as much evidence as possible to indict ZAB. A white paper was brought out to catalogue malpractices of Bhutto's rule. When it came to his financial probity or otherwise, there was mention of an installation of an air conditioning plant at state expense at 70 Clifton, Karachi. The residence had been declared the prime minister's camp office. The same document, however, added that at a subsequent stage, ZAB paid for the amount at depreciated cost as worked out by the cabinet division. Compare this act with the brazen conduct of many of his successors. It seemed that there was no other plausible case to tighten the noose around him than to try him in the murder case.
Two days after ZAB’s execution, General Zia was interviewed by the Urdu service of the BBC. To a question about Bhutto's execution, he tersely retorted, “The higher you go, the harder you fall.” A proverbial truth indeed, it sadly enough, became the literal truth when the general lost his life in an air crash.
There was a downside to ZAB's eventful era. While he exuded a lot of positive energy on major issues, on transactional matters, he lost his patience and poise. Dissension and differences were an anathema to his working style. The treatment meted out to nationalists in erstwhile NWFP and in Balochistan left deep scars. His governance smacked of authoritarian rule. The Defence of Pakistan Rule (DPR) was invoked on flimsy pretexts. Petty hoarders were often booked under its section 144 and imposition of the Maintenance of Public Order seemed to be the rule of the day. Dissent within the party was also an anathema to him. The shoddy manner in which senior leaders like JA Rahim, Meraj Muhammad Khan, Mir Rasul Bakhsh Talpur, Mukhtar Rana and Malik Suleman were treated is the sad story of our politics. The riddle of the Dalai camp could be resolved only after ZAB faded from the scene.
Despite these grey areas, ZAB was indeed a larger than life figure: a towering personality, but like a hero from a Greek tragedy, one who possessed fatal flaws.
A shorter version of this opinion piece was published in The Express Tribune on April 4th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@M Adil: You are right sir in the sense that It is high time to set the record straight...with respect to the Great Tragedy and theatrics of Bhutto Sahab at UN you may go through the recently published book'Blood Telegram and Indias Secret War in East Pakistan'by Garry J Bass, professor at Princeton University ' Based on the records of white house this book presents the true picture as to what was going in at UN at that time as well as elsewhere in the world.The book shows that India was all out to grab East Pakistan and Russia was all out for him until threathened by Nixon and the presence of the Seventh fleet in the Bay of Bengal.It is in this context when you judge Bhutto's action at UN you may be compelled to call him a hero.What did the poor masses of Pakistan get from him, it is only they who have the right to reply to this question which they have been doing whenever their opinion has been fairly invited in the elections..Bhutto is still a legend for them and haunts some of the minds as strongly as he did 40 years ago.
In case of ZAB the end justified the means even if it led to the destruction of Pakistan.
In 1969 Bhutto manipulated a few of the generals and replaced Ayub Khan, then refused to accept the election results, and thereafter causing the 1971 war. His UN speech and dramatics of tearing the treaty were mere theatrics which were too little, too late - and meant to impress the poor gullible audience back home. Only now are we beginning to find out who actually caused the '65 and '71 wars. Thank God his devious and ultimately destructive nepotism is at last coming to an end. Even after 40 years, those poor people don't have his promised Roti, Kaprra aur Makaan. Though, for his son in law and his family who are wining and dining, wearing expensive suits and living it up in Bilawal House, that slogan more than came true.
Strangely enough every writer on ZAB is ignoring his years with the first military government not for one, two but eight full years...
@Nikki: In general your analysis is good, but you, I think ,did not read full article?
"It was one of the most painful days in the history of the country indeed when a popular elected Prime Minister was taken to gallows"
What about the painful time when ZAB chose to break the country for assuming the country's premiership and tried to overthrow a democratically elected Mujeeb ur Rehman, by using a country's army to wage war against its own civilians.
I pity these psuedo-intellectuals who will keep praising traitors like ZAB till the end of times.
@Author: Only two words for you: Second Ammendment
@OMer: You spelled "Destroy" wrong.
Here is an Op Ed by Dr. Mubashar Hassan. He is currently no friend of PPP. In fact he had filed the case about Swiss bank accounts. However, at his age and based upon his history he is a man of great character and has never been a lota.
http://www.nation.com.pk/columns/04-Apr-2014/the-bhutto-i-knew
THank god for sending Zia ul Haque to save our economy and country
It was one of the most painful days in the history of the country indeed when a popular elected Prime Minister was taken to gallows.The writer has tried to recall duly but cautiously the tragic day while pointing out the grey area during the tenure of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.He has rightly appreciated the services rendered to the nation by Bhutto Sahab but in my opinion the greatest compliments to Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto is that even his blood thirsty opponents have been compelled to pay tributes to him as a hero for providing atomic strength as a deterrent to the defense of the country as well as framing the 73 constitution with consensus.The writer missed to mention the most fatal mistake that Bhutto Sahab made,which in fact cost him his life , by choosing Zia ul Haq as Army Chief superseding a chain of generals..just because he appeared to be a harmless characters with a non professional back ground, good at only to please his bosses...It is at this point that there is a lesson to learn for all.
It was one of the most painful days in the history of the country indeed when a popular elected Prime Minister had been taken to gallows.The writer has tried to recall duly but cautiously the tragic day while pointing out the grey areas as well during the tenure of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.He has rightly appreciated the services rendered to the nation by Bhutto Sahab but in my opinion the greatest compliments to Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto is that even his blood thirsty opponents have been compelled to pay tributes to him as a hero for providing atomic strength as a deterrent to the defense of the country as well as framing the 73 constitution with consensus.The writer missed to mention the most fatal mistake that Bhutto Sahab made,which in fact cost him his life , by choosing Zia ul Haq as Army Chief superseding a chain of generals..just because he appeared to be a harmless characters with a non professional back ground, good at only to please his bosses...It is at this point that there is a lesson to learn for all.
All said and done, the ZAB era was not positive for Pakistan.
History has proven that ZABs assassination was a “Judicial Murder”. Thirty-five years ago on April 4, this nation was deprived of a visionary leader who gave the oppressed people hope for a bright and better future. ZAB was born to accomplish great deeds. He brought 90,000 prisoners of war with honor from India and got back the territory lost in war. Bhutto’s vision was precise and pragmatic. The Islamic summit was a milestone in the realization of the dream of solidarity and unity of the Muslim world and the 1973 constitution is a milestone in the history of Pakistan. The philosophy of ZAB , that it is the common man who is the real source of power, is a guiding light and will continue to live in the hearts and minds of those who believe that equal opportunity for all.