Ogra scam: Supreme Court summons NAB chief

Bench orders the bureau to explain non-compliance of its orders.


Hasnaat Malik January 21, 2014
The bench, however, noted that there was only a period of five months, when NAB was without a chairman. PHOTO: AFP/FILE

ISLAMABAD:


The Supreme Court summoned National Accountability Bureau chief Qamar Zaman Chaudhry today (Wednesday) to explain why its November 2011 ruling in the over Rs82 billion Ogra scam hadn’t been complied with.


A three-judge bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Jawwad S Khawaja, observed on Tuesday that the progress on the Ogra corruption case was “extremely slow”.

“Order sheets show that for a period of more than 26 months, which elapsed since the date of our judgment, very little or at most negligent progress has been made in the investigation and the prosecution of at least four aspects of the case, which have been repeatedly referred to in earlier orders,” the court order said.

 photo 29_zpse0739d96.jpg

Four aspects of case

Reeling off four features of the Ogra corruption case, the court says that first is the question of those who may have been responsible for, and involved in, the appointment of Tauqir Sadiq as Ogra chairman.

The second is the matter of prosecuting Tauqir Sadiq and others and recovering the amount, which according to the initial investigation made by the NAB, exceeds Rs82 billion.

The third is identifying persons who were prima facie, complicit in enabling Tauqir Sadiq to abscond and get out of Pakistan.

The fourth is the case of whether persons within the NAB or outside of the bureau may have been less than diligent in pursuing the case.

Court unsatisfied

During the hearing of the case on Tuesday, NAB Prosecutor General K K Agha appeared before the bench and pointed out that a reference had been filed in this matter, which was pending adjudication in the accountability court.

He also said that between May 2013 and October 2013 there was no NAB chairman, a fact that stalled all progress in the case.

The bench, however, expressed dissatisfaction over the prosecutor’s statement and noted that over 26 months have passed since its judgment and there was only a period of five months, when NAB was without a chairman.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 22nd, 2014.

COMMENTS (1)

Saleem | 10 years ago | Reply

Justice Khawaja is correct in asking what has NAB done all these years? Why there is not a single high profile criminal that NAB was able to prosecute and put behind bar. If this Chairman is not capable of cleaning NAB and delivering results then he must be fired.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ