Marks & Spencer under fire after Muslim staffer refuses to sell alcohol

The chain's policy on accommodating religious beliefs of staffers ruffles feathers in England.


Web Desk December 23, 2013
Customer service is our number one priority. We regret that in the highlighted case this was not delivered to our usual standards. - M&S PHOTO: MARKS & SPENCER FACEBOOK PAGE

LONDON: Marks & Spencer (M&S) has found itself embroiled in a major controversy after a Muslim staffer on Saturday refused to serve a customer who was buying champagne, reported BBC News.

An unnamed customer told the local newspaper they had tried to buy a bottle of champagne from an M&S store in London, but the member of staff "was very apologetic but said she could not serve me" and asked the customer to use another till.

M&S has a policy that tries to accommodate employees with different religious beliefs.

“Where we have an employee whose religious beliefs restrict food or drink they can handle, we work closely with our member of staff to place them in suitable role, such as in our clothing department or bakery in foods,” said a spokesperson for M&S.

The policy applies throughout its 700-plus stores.

This incident caused quite an uproar when the news surfaced on British websites and social media.

The BBC quoted Khola Hasan, an Islamic law consultant, who said that she thought the M&S employee's refusal to serve the customer was "ridiculous".

“I don't think the Islamic ruling is being so difficult that Muslims cannot cope in society," she said.

In comparison, other retailers said they would work with their employees on a case-by-case basis to let Muslims avoid handling alcohol or pork, and would allow similar exceptions for other religions.

The episode has caused many loyal customers to take it up to social media sites to express their frustration.

Angela Phillips, a loyal customer posted on the official Marks & Spencer page saying “If M&S go ahead with this they are going to lose so many loyal customers… if they do not want to serve people with pork or alcohol they shouldn't work in the food hall… simple!”

A Facebook page by the name of “Boycott Marks & Spencer” has surfaced the social networking site with over 7,844 likes in just a little less than 24 hours.

Following the uproar on Facebook, Marks & Spencer issued a press release that stated “Customer service is our number one priority. We regret that in the highlighted case this was not delivered to our usual standards.”

Stressing on their implemented policy, the statement added “This policy has been successfully implemented over many years and does not compromise our ability to offer the highest level of customer service.”

COMMENTS (66)

Stranger | 10 years ago | Reply

@paki v paki: Well your logic is tough to refute . IF this girl were so bad then she would have been rude or shouted or created a fuss. Instead she politely refused. I think she did the right thing by being true to herself and not hurting the customer by shouting. She did the best in her circumstances. Its the fault of the store in this case. They should have checked with her before allocating her that stall.

Wake Up | 10 years ago | Reply

@Rakib: She took up the job in a store that makes money by selling alcohol. She has no problem in getting paid from that money but doesn't want to sell it herself. How is that not hypocrisy. Selective implementation of beliefs and expecting others to adjust to your own double standards is really shallow in my opinion.

Secondly she knew the store sells alcohol before she started so should not have taken the job if she can't perform the required duties. It's not rocket science. No warped logic can defend her actions. The store is only trying to be politically correct cause the Muslim community will play the minority and discrimination card. Either way now stores will think twice before hiring Muslims cause of her senseless actions which is sad.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ