Economic policy management covers a large area encompassing several sectors and sub-section. An important area of macroeconomic management is monetary policy and the issue of discount rate and banking spread that impacts the cost of production. Another critical area is that of economic governance and law and order.
There are a host of procedural issues that industrialists and industrial managers face on a day to day basis and which impacts on manufacturing development. The working paper, “Proposed Agenda for Sustained Economic Revival” written by Dr Kaiser Bengali looks at various aspects of macroeconomic policy, considered more critical for economic revival, and argues for priority attention to these aspects.
The paper proposes reforms in the fiscal and import structures of the economy, with the aim of resolving the underlying severity of budget and current account deficits.
The paper considers plugging the rupee and dollar gaps as crucial for sustained economic recovery and, in this respect, pleads for stopping haemorrhaging of foreign exchange and for expansion of the industrial base and creating a sustained basis for employment growth.
Dr Bengali is a former Managing Director of the Social Policy and Development Centre and currently a Consultant. He has also served as Adviser to Chief Minister Sindh for Planning and Development.
_____________________________________________________________
There is an air of optimism since the change of government but the fact remains that Pakistan faces grim economic prospects and short-term measures will not do the trick. Damage that has been done over a period of decades cannot be undone in just a few years.
So far, what the governments have been doing is treat the symptoms and not the cause and no single regime can be held responsible for this state of affairs, but there is no doubt, that there needs to be a unified effort to turn things around.
The measures that need to be taken are not just economic in nature. Supremacy of the Constitution, an independent Judiciary and continuity of democracy are all elements that need to be promoted and upheld to pave the way towards a stable environment, which will then encourage economic growth. This cannot be done until the political setup which will have to include all political parties, the bureaucracy and the agricultural and industrial leadership develop a consensus on the way forward.
How we got here
However, this time around, we need to treat the disease, and not just the symptoms, we need to diagnose how we got here, isolate the root causes and eventually, find possible solutions.
One of the primary transformations that Pakistan has undergone since the 1970s is the shift from a production based to consumption based economy. This is primarily why in our case a drop in imports signals a drop in industrial output, in retail sales and in tax generation, as a result.
Today almost 85% of the GDP is generated by consumption, a situation that was different prior to the 1980s. One way that the report “Agenda for Sustained Economic Revival” looks at this and comes to this conclusion is by looking at the numbers for energy consumption. According to the report, until about 1990, industrial consumption exceeded domestic consumption but went through a gradual reversal after that. Now domestic power consumption is rising at a faster pace than industrial power consumption.
Source: Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources
One of the primary reasons given for this was when the focus of the government shifted. Up to the 70s, the main focus had been on industrial growth, agricultural revolution and economic development.
However, the regional paradigm shifted post 1977 and since then Pakistan has become a security state.
Once again, the report looks at a set of numbers and quotes defence spending to back this up. For example, according to data the growth of economic and development spending in the 70s was 21% per year while defence expenditure was growing at about two percent. In the 1980s development spending nose-dived to an annual increase of three percent while defence spending jumped to nine percent.
Saying that Pakistan has slipped from being an economic state to a security state is an opinion that can be challenged but the numbers that indicate this shift are irrefutable. And this is a result of the shift in the approach to economic management over the last three decades.
The trend shifted from accumulation of assets in the development period, including but not limited to the construction of dams, canals, motorways, power plants and, industrial zones and factories. And this growth was led by the public sector and complemented by the private sector. Whether one agrees with or supports the regimes in place, or not, it is an undeniable fact that Pakistan underwent an industrial and agricultural revolution in the 60s and 70s.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 16th, 2013.
Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.
COMMENTS (22)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Gratgy:
"Wrong, he means that you became a security state because of your desire to bleed India."
Thanks for answering @Ali Tanoli's question. Yes, as you clarified, I did mean exactly what you wrote.
Who reads economists report when the Govt. can print money out of thin air or use IMF ATM.
@Muhammad: It is against human nature to be dictated. Nobody likes dictator or dictatorship. But it is ironically funny that most of us in private life try to dictate people all the time.
If I may say so, Pakistan is the only country where dictatorship just remains a label. Had there been like Tito, Saddam, Asad, Mahatir etc govern Pakistan then Pakistan should have been a wonder by now.
Economy was in much better shape in Zia's time overall. Remittance + Aid + less corruption. In came the democratic 90s and country started nose dive.
It is a fact.
regards,
@Ali Tanoli
So u agreed that we became security state because of india
Wrong, he means that you became a security state because of your desire to bleed India.
I normally would not explain other's comments, but now since I did, that makes you really special
@Asad Khan: Yes, but you're forgetting post 1977 was Zia era which was also during army's time. Having the best economy during the army's time and the worst during the army's time really proves the army has nothing to do with anything. It all depends on how good a leader is. You dictator lovers never mention Zia when trying to change people's opinion about democracy.
"This cannot be done until the political setup which will have to include all political parties, the bureaucracy and the agricultural and industrial leadership develop a consensus on the way forward." Well said, the writer is asking solution from those who are part of the problem.
@redsa: "Mr. Kaiser Bengali is the same guy who was making the case to involve IMF back to Pakistan". I don't know what all he had written before, but this is shooting the messenger. IMF is already here and has confirmed a deal. Pakistan will have a serious BoP crisis without IMF loans, especially because the global financial markets don't have much confidence in Pakistani government bonds.
@Observer So u agreed that we became security state because of india thank u man for accepting the truth.
Security should be priority in neighborhood of cukoo world.
Mr. Kaiser Bengali is the same guy who was making the case to involve IMF back to Pakistan, and his amazing "ideas" and facts & figures were mostly invested in defending the cronyism and the corruption of the peoples party govt. that acquired debt from all over the world as part of their "economic plan" or sold govt. jobs to the pouplation, these shameless paid economists can keep their plans and wisdom to themselves, everybody knows their only economic plan that they get implemented is the personal plan.
@ita economy stupit, Hahahaaha compairing Pakistan with tiny miny izraeel who gets 12 billions under the table from Abba amreeca + unlimited busniss & def protection and from france and England too
@Asad Khan:
"It is true due to perpetual security situation of North West of the Country made a security state "
No. The Northwest problems are only symptoms of a much deeper malaise.
Pakistan became a security state way back starting in 1947 due to its anti-India paradigm. The anti-India paradigm and misplaced priority on Kashmir resulted in the 1965 and 1971 wars with India. After the 1971 defeat, the security paradigm took an exponential leap with Bhutto's official declaration that "we will bleed India through 1000 cuts in a 1000 year war and we will eat grass to get the Islamic bomb". To support this obsession the Pakistani Establishment devised the Afghan strategic depth strategy, which further helped destabilize Pakistan itself.
Mr Bengali is a PPP economist and his previous writing are mainly for social development Now he is changing his tune. Under every PPP govt the private industry has suffered. Now when GOP has no funds to directly in industry he showing this lack of concern for investment. What has been his stand on investment in water storage and hydro electric development?.Please give a break.
Pakistan, India and Israel got independence at the same time. Through out the existence of Israel and Pakistan both are close to USA for geopolitical reasons. Israel utilized its closeness to USA to its fullest and has become a thriving nation with lots of economic and intellectual potentials. In contrast Pakistan used closeness to US in anti India activity rather than economic and social prosperity. The state of Union of Pakistan in simple term is that all military equipment comes with a short expiry date and becomes a rust bucket. Although the color of Pakistani flag is green but in reality brown has overtaken the green color.
Electric consumption by the industrial sector in Pakistan has declined whereas that in China is gone up. Cost of buying friendship and having a special cell in PM office. GDP is based on basket full sectors. Certain sector of economy like cinema, music, songs, concerts are dead due to some bad fatwa’s.
The issue of security in Pakistan is more significant than economic uplift. Yes, we want to grow economically but first we want our lives to be secured. Therefore, I commend our government' efforts on security issues.
And then we wonder how we got into such a mess.
Bengali makes some valid points and policy prescriptions. But I believe more than anything, it is corruption and economic and state mismanagement that has eaten away resources, i.e., taxes, that should have gone into capital accumulation. As an example how do you explain the fate of Railways and PIA in a country of 180+ million people?? Do people no longer wish to travel?? Manufacturing no longer transports cargo?? Railways should have expanded 100 fold by now and PIA should have had more than 150+ aircraft with the same number of people running them. If this has happened to public organizations, imagine the rot in not so public structures, like the armed forces and the bureaucracy?? This type of mismanagement and corruption was absent in Pakistan until Zia ul Haq, who set us off on a path of destruction. Then came Benazir, Sharif, Musharraf era of huge deficit financing hidden in the numbers by official chicanery, mastered by Shaukat Aziz's consumption driven economic model. Even IMF and WB stopped believing in our economic numbers. People are not stupid that they cannot see a huge transfer of wealth and resources having occurred in the last 30 years to family run political parties and military. People thereafter took their example to heart and followed them by stealing power, gas and water plus not paying taxes due on income. When they realized that our leaders and bureaucracy steal their money and transfer it to Swiss and other Banks abroad, then they no longer have a contract with the State, that their taxes will be used to provide education, health services and law and order. When little girls are raped without any consequences, when law and order does not exist (cite me one case that the SC has decided on merit?), corruption has destroyed the market economy, gulf between have and have nots is leading to hunger, then non-state actors will step in to fill the vacuum. Now the state is going to spend money to fight not external threats but internal. That's how Civil War starts. A little too late to suggest policy prescriptions??
prey to god....all ur problems will be solved..no need to study ......
Hope the Government starts listening to the experts more,and to maulanas less
There you go, Best era of Pakistan. (no democracy in 60s)
Two full fledged wars back to back (65 & 71) but the country did not suffer that much because the managers at that time knows that we can switch political allegiance but cant hide our corruption. (Fear of Fairness)
It is true due to perpetual security situation of North West of the Country made a security state but even then it can pull through. Had there been Kalabagh constructed and land reforms initiated then this country has a potential to withstand any 9/11s. (Energy & Food Security)
Although the author just scratch the surface and produced a more opinion oriented piece, but I think the Author should be commended.
regards,