"On one hand, it helps the Syrians emerge from the crisis and on the other it has allowed for averting war against Syria...," Minister of State for National Reconciliation Ali Haidar told Russian news agency Ria Novosti.
"It's a victory for Syria that was achieved thanks to our Russian friends."
His remarks came as US Secretary of State John Kerry met Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to brief him on the plan to eradicate Syria's chemical weapons.
Washington is seeking to bolster international support for the agreement inked in Geneva on Saturday, which demands action from Damascus within days.
The ambitious plan to dismantle and destroy Syria's chemical arms stockpile -- one of the largest in the world -- by mid-2014 was thrashed out during three days of talks in Geneva between Kerry and his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov.
It gives Syrian President Bashar al-Assad a week to hand over details of his regime's arsenal of the internationally banned arms in order to avert unspecified sanctions and the threat of US-led military strikes.
It also specifies there must be immediate access for arms control experts and that inspections of what the US says is some 45 sites linked to the Syrian chemical weapons programme must be completed by November.
Responses from across the world
The deal won the backing of China, a veto-wielding permanent member of the Security Council, which like Russia has vetoed several UN resolutions on Syria.
"This agreement will enable tensions in Syria to be eased," Foreign Minister Wang Yi told his visiting French counterpart Laurent Fabius who will meet Lavrov on Tuesday in Moscow.
It was also welcomed by German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, who said: "It is important, however, that it be put into practice."
Arab League chief Nabil al-Arabi called the deal "a step closer to a political solution" to the conflict.
Ahead of Sunday's Kerry meeting, Netanyahu said he hoped the accord would see the complete destruction of the Damascus regime's chemical weapons.
"We hope that the Russian-US agreement on Syria's chemical weapons will bear fruit but the real test will be in its implementation: the full dismantling of the regime's chemical weapons stockpile," he said at a ceremony marking 40 years since the Yom Kippur War.
Israel has voiced alarm at the use of chemical weapons inside Syria because of the potential fallout for Israelis across the border.
Some Israeli commentators raised the question of whether Washington would lean on Israel to ratify the international treaty banning the use of chemical weapons.
Israel signed the Chemical Weapons Convention in 1993 but never ratified it, despite demands to do so from Washington and Moscow.
Syrian rebels reject deal
The Syrian rebels, fighting to oust Assad since March 2011, have rejected the deal, warning it would not halt the conflict that has killed more than 110,000 people and displaced millions.
"Are we Syrians supposed to wait until mid-2014, to continue being killed every day and to accept (the deal) just because the chemical arms will be destroyed in 2014?" asked Free Syrian Army chief General Selim Idriss.
But in Damascus there was a flicker of hope the end of the devastating 30-month conflict may be in sight.
Washington says Assad's forces unleashed sarin gas on the suburb, killing some 1,400 people.
UN chief Ban Ki-moon has accused Assad of multiple crimes against humanity and said the UN inspectors' report would provide "overwhelming" confirmation chemical weapons were used.
President Barack Obama welcomed the US-Russian deal, but said the pressure was now on Assad to deliver.
And he warned that Washington, which has threatened military strikes against Syria in response to last month's chemical attacks, "remains prepared to act".
Kerry said the joint plan would be encapsulated in a Security Council resolution drawn up under Chapter Seven of the UN charter, which provides for enforcement through sanctions, including the possible use of military force.
But with Russia strongly opposed to the use of military threats against its long-term ally Syria, and also wielding a veto on the Council, Kerry acknowledged it would be up to debate in the Security Council over what sanctions to impose.
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@NP: Agree with you completely. Assad won nothing. Both Russia and USA kicked him and his people in the pants. Now they will dismantle the state in future negotiations among all parties, like they did in Afghanistan. Bye Bye Syria.
@Shamim: ""China and Russian taken stand which pushing back to usa"". Both China and Russia could not stop USA of bombing Syria. It was this threat that lead to this development. Looks like your would revolves only round CAI/RAW/MOSSAD.
I wonder if Assad will claim "victory" when the UN comes out next week and proves he massacred his own people or when the head of the UN wants him charges for "crimes against humanity"? Like most bullies he's found of talking tough, beating up little guys, and running like the wind when someone with strength confronts him. Kudo's to Russia maybe in order - but in the long run Putin is going to look rather shabby for his support of a low life like Assad.
Let us hope Syrian Government and rebels sit down now and negotiate.There is always give and take in negotiations.Syria should listen to the genuine demands of its people and introduce legislation to the effect. The rebels should lay down arms,and request all the foreign mercenaries to leave.Iran and Saudi Arabia should work towards resolving the Shia-Sunni differences peacefully(in the end they are both muslim countries) and refrain from starting proxy wars in other countries.West including Russia should stop their Paternalistic approach towards the East. East should stop using terrorism as a political tool.It hurts them more than anybody else.
Good to see Russians playing a positive role and asserting their view point and not giving in to US like they did after 9/11 and for Iraq War. It is the need of the hour that Russians enhance their role in the region and use their influence on Assad Regime to stop killing and massacre of innocent civilians too...!
No where in this story does any side claim that this is a victory over the USA...it is only the editors of ET who are calling it that...it is a victory for humanity that a ruthless dictator is being forced to relinquish his chemical weapons...there was no battle and a positive result came from the negotiations...sound like what really happened is president Obama won a victory over Assad without firing a single shot!....
There is no "victory" when a man who unleashes poison gas on his own people is allowed to stay in power. And shame on the "Muslim" world for tolerating yet another brutal dictator. All my life I have heard that the entire suffers when one muslim suffers. This never seems to apply when dictators, kings and mullahs do terrible things to their people. What hypocrisy.
Apparently it has been seems that Russia play vital role in solution to rescue Syrian peoples from strike of usa. China and Russian taken stand which pushing back to usa. So that, usa surrender the idea of attack as desired of israel.