Lecture: ‘Religion should be separate from the state’s affairs’

Hoodbhoy says theocratic states create an unequal society.


Our Correspondent September 06, 2013
Hoodbhoy highlighted the need for states to keep religion out for the affairs of state. PHOTO: FILE.

LAHORE:


“Religion must be separated from the state,” Pervez Hoodbhoy said on Thursday.


He was speaking at the Forman Christian College on States Under Siege: Pakistan, Egypt and Syria.

Hoodbhoy joined the Forman Christian College Department of Physics as professor of mathematics and physics on September 2.

Hoodbhoy highlighted the need for states to keep religion out for the affairs of state.

“Theocratic states are unfair to monitories,” he said.

He said in theocratic states, a specific religious ideology was imposed on weaker groups. This created an unequal society.

In Pakistan, he said, the society was currently in a state of confusion.

“When you demand a state on the basis of religion, the question is which particular variant of that religion is being demanded?” he said.

On the recent ouster of Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi, Hoodbhoy said the people of the country should have been more patient with the democratic process. However, he said, they had the right to change their minds.

He expressed his reservations over the use of force by the military on pro-Morsi supporters.

He said the United States wanted to intervene in Syria for its own geo-political interests, not for humanitarian reasons.

“Weak states are prone to all kinds of disasters and collapse,” he said. “So is Syria.”

He said the state was internally weak because of the strong opposition of the Sunni rebels. The lecture was attended by a large number of students and faculty.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 7th, 2013. 

COMMENTS (9)

Indian | 11 years ago | Reply

@arshad , can a non muslim be head of a state in islamic state? if no then it is unfair and we reject it.

Adeel Arshad | 11 years ago | Reply

We first need to educate the Pakistani nation about difference between religious beliefs and religious principles. Jinnah wanted the Islamic democratic state based on Islamic principles. When it comes to politics based on Islamic principles, and then there are no or very little differences among existing schools of thoughts in today’s Muslim world. This is the very important point which we need to emphasize as religious differences are only connected with religious ideology. No sect denies or disagrees with Islamic social, economic and political laws. Islamic state should handle its affairs abiding those laws based on Islamic principles. We cannot enforce Sunni, Shia or any other ideology on society because an ideology is based on believes of an individual who have the full right to agree or disagree. In that you can accommodate all kinds of belief systems in an Islamic society. The leader of the state can be anyone who is ready to deliver his responsibilities under the Islamic laws or jurisprudence just like the constitution of any independent state. Talking about the rights of minorities, they are fully independent to follow their religion and it will never create any conflict with laws of an Islamic state in that way. The religious personalities like Mullahs etc. may not be involved in power because if they are in power then in case of corruption or bad governance it creates a chance to blame religion for the bad doings of the politician and people start getting negative impression regarding role of religion in state affairs. The law is the criteria not the ideology. Ideology will further flourish with society if politics will be based on Islamic principles.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ