The story is about a planet Krypton getting destroyed due to its unstable core. But the destruction is preceded by infighting when General Zod declares martial law on Krypton and kills the scientist (Superman’s dad) Jor-El. Now, this is what our economists would describe as a “fragile natural system” or a “limited access order”, which does not have a streamlined system for elite negotiation. Their theory is that natural states limit violence by political manipulation of the economy to create privileged interests. In a fragile state, however, the elite use violence to renegotiate the political position that will then be used to draw rents. It is also believed that there are three kinds of natural states: fragile, basic and mature, and states can shift from one category to another, back and forth.
According to this typology, Krypton seems to be a planet between basic and fragile because it has a system whereby Zod is punished and he and his supporters put in incubators and shipped out to the “phantom zone”, where they remain until Krypton gets destroyed and they are released. Meanwile, Jor-El has put his newborn son (Superman) in a ship to planet Earth but also infuses the child with the codex or the genetic code for recreation of Krypton. The boy grows up in Kansas, USA, with special powers and later meets the heroine who helps him around when General Zod, who has gotten free due to the destruction of Krypton, returns to fight superman so as to recreate his own planet. She supports him because Superman is trying to save the world from takeover and destruction by General Zod.
Obviously, General Zod is the villain, who claimed (in the film) to want to destroy anything that came in the way of him defending Krypton. In many ways, he is much like Egypt’s Abdel-Fattah alSissi, who claimed to have sacked the elected President Mohamed Morsi to save Egypt. There are quite a few Arab Springers in Egypt who are willing to buy his argument that destroying an infant democracy in the country was driven by the need to save it from a bad politician who was not listening and was unwilling to bring about national unity. The takeover is, in fact, a move to do so. Of course, alSissi will not disclose the fact that the takeover is not about Egypt but about the military’s institutional interests and the personal interests of the generals. Morsi became unpopular in the eyes of the military not because of his ideology but because he had bulldozed the military and was challenging their rents. A more stable “natural state” described by the above economists would have guaranteed that the elite (religious, political, economic, social and intellectual) respected one another’s boundaries in order to establish a stable system guaranteeing maximum rents for all. Like Zod, alSissi used threat of violence (by taking over power) to maximise his own gains.
The Egyptian general, of course, has an edge over his counterpart in the film because he does not have to fight the US and its security establishment, which is happy to see the back of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was in control of the Egyptian state. Since a major setback in Iran during the revolution, when Washington was caught with its pants down supporting the Shah, the US administrations have become adapt at hiding their true loyalty to a regime. For example, it was so willing to be seen on the right side of Morsi when he was in power that some liberal political and women activists were not invited to diplomatic functions by the US ambassador. Now, the tide has turned and things may change.
In order to survive, General alSissi must try to play the “divide and rule” game, which is easy in a society that is already divided between the conservative Islamists and the liberals who tend to see Morsi’s departure mainly as “good riddance of bad Islamism” (the whole thing makes one miss the late Soviet Union more. To think of times when liberals would stand against military regimes). The genetic codex to recreate an Egypt where the military will remain powerful, requires incubating the society with a mindset that begins to see the armed forces as a necessity. The liberals can be permanently confused through the understanding that it is the military which stands between them and Islamism. Moreover, the tool for planting the mindset lies in the neo-capitalist system. In an age where people are keen to make money and idealism is kind of dead and everyone is willing to justify their behaviour as pragmatism or political realism, the Egyptian military could posit itself as the key source of power that everyone must cosy up to for maximising their rents. The current dispensation in Cairo will soon learn that numerous actors ranging from bureaucrats, and businessmen to media, academia, the NGO sector and more will all happily negotiate and surrender.
The main issue is dealing with Morsi’s supporters for which a mix of coercion and co-option will work. Though the international media will report instances of human rights violations, the military regime may not face a lot of resistance, certainly not from the region where the monarchies were already worried to see Morsi come into power. Be it the Alawite rule in Syria or the Salafi-supporting Saudi monarchy, the political development in Egypt had made all unhappy.
General alSissi will realise soon that with most things in his favour, hard coercion will take him a long way until he could turn to soft coercion, which is easier to hide and to fool people in believing that the military has the country’s best interest at heart. This way he can ensure that a “superman” is never born in Egypt.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 11th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Request general Sissi to hire you as a consultant on coups and pushing foreign agenda.
Islamic supremacy ended with the invention of Gun and better weapons compared to sword. Muslims could not compete once technological advancement took over Jazba e shahadat.
"Conservative Islamists and the liberals," yes. The division is clear. The suburbanites are mostly liberal whereas the countryside exhibits conservatism. The liberals want to bypass the Islamic era and its influences and relate to the ancient Egyptian civilization and take pride in the Pyramids, for example, which are shown on Egyptian currency. The conservative Islamists want to emulate the period of the Islamic Caliphate. The question is how to bridge the divide.
Pakistan media is teaching Al Sissi how to keep the nation divided. Weldone you have gone international in spreading your virus, after damaging Pakistan.
"In order to survive, General alSissi must try to play the “divide and rule” game, which is easy in a society that is already divided between the conservative Islamists and the liberals who tend to see Morsi’s departure mainly as “good riddance of bad Islamism” "Conservative Islamists and the liberals" reminds me of my flight from Cairo to Jeddah in 1987 even then this division existed. I was in a state of "Ahram” and an Egyptian asked me at to what I thought of Egypt? At the very moment the plane was passing by the Egyptian pyramids and I remarked that the Egyptians have to make a choice between the pyramids, also known as ahrams (which symbolize Egypt’s symbolical identification with secularism) and the Ahram, which one wears for Umra (which might symbolize identification with Islam.) During my extended visit, I saw for example, that the people of Roxanne an up scale suburb of Cairo where very liberal and oriented towards European culture, whereas just thirty miles south of Cairo the countryside was more conservative. Egypt also signifies the dilemma that many a Muslim society faces between becoming an Islam oriented state or a secular/liberal state.
The article does not talk about the foreign abettors and financiers of alSissi's. Saudi Arabia and UAE announced only yesterday a $8 billion token reward to this killer General and USA has not suspended the AID to Egypt and calling it short of a coup. Morsi on the other hand is a brave politician and his firmness against a powerful Army junta is a lesson for Pakistani naive politicians.
Excellent piece.
The Egyptian and Pakistani armies have much in common.
The word 'Egyptian' can be easily replaced by 'Pakistani' almost all over the NY Times article below, describing the 'untouchable' status of the Egyptian army:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/04/world/middleeast/Egyptian-military-reasserts-its-allegiance-to-its-privileges.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
The best bet of a liberal regime in a Muslim majority country is Dictatorship. Turkey, Egypt, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia are examples of how Democracy may actually turn out be be permanent Islamism and the complete restructuring of the Political space in favour of Islamists.
Most non-Muslim countries and individuals would prefer a Dictator, who is liberal, than a Democrat who is Islamist, who will later turn Dictator.
Once again Egyptian army proved its brilliance, alas, off the field. It is used to making compensation for its poor ON field performance.
Once again Egyptian army proved its brilliance, alas, off the field. It is used to making compensation for its poor ON field performance.
Pakistan Army and Egyptain Army are both are having large economic interest with same ideological orientation of secular nationalist and not liberal democratic, highly politised and considered themself only partriots.
spot on Ayesha
Call it an adverse reaction to our irrational religiosity on my part, here are my two cents. While I agree with your premise that what Al Sissy did was counter intuitive to democratic norms, however, did they need to wait for Morsi to make Egypt a Sharia compliant, retrogressive country, in perpetual war within and without? Remember, what general Zia did to Pakistan in an attempt to 'Islamize' it. Luckily Egyptian army do not believe in 'jihad fi sabilillah'' like their counterparts in Pakistan. Let us reserve our judgement on this overtly self serving power grab by Al Sissi.
Asaf
aala, spot on
The huge Egyptian army may have been repeatedly defeated by a tiny Israeli army but they sure have captured their own country for since its birth. How could they tolerate a democratically elected head of the state? After all the talk of Arab Spring one can safely say “the more things change the more they stay the same”. It is not surprising that the kingdoms and sheikhdoms are welcoming the military coup and its chosen govt and offering billions of dollars.
Dear Aisha, Krypton perished because in their desperation to access much needed, depleted source of energy they tapped the center or core of their planet which made it unstable and eventually imploded. This is how I interpret the analogy with Egypt, millions seeking their fundamental rights as human beings protested against tyranny of Hosni Mubarak and reached for the core or Muslim brotherhood to give them the energy that was beyond their reach. It worked in the beginning and everyone was happy with their new source of energy (freedom), but it made their planet (country) unstable because Muslim brotherhood was a volatile, fascist source of energy declaring Jihad in Syria against fellow Muslims (Kryptonians) promoting a much wider Shia Sunni (intra plant) conflict. As time progressed, Muslim Brotherhood wanted more power (energy) and dug deeper into their core by pushing their agenda, thus Jor-El the wise scientist had no choice but to take control of the Codex (Government).
My movie ending is different from the original, Krypton being given another chance to redeem itself. I like happy endings, why wish for total destruction of planets, countries thats no fun, good movie though.
Egyptian military can consult Pakistan military about how to rule and control all aspects of the government, in or out of power.
Brilliant writing. Algeria all over again.