I preferred Gavaskar though I was a bowler. He was a writer and that interested me. He was articulate in print (his dull, stammering style of commentary was still in the future) and his first two books, Sunny Days and Runs ‘N Ruins, were first rate.
Kapil was inarticulate and frankly, not of the quality that Gavaskar was. I watched the opener master the West Indies attack when fast-bowling meant something different than it does today. Of all his qualities, Gavaskar’s stand out one was his courage. There were other batsmen with as much talent as him — the Chappell brothers, Viv and Barry Richards, Graeme Pollock, Geoffrey Boycott, Clive Lloyd and Pakistan’s Zaheer Abbas and Javed Miandad.
But none of them, whether through lack of opportunity (in the case of the South Africans and Viv Richards and Lloyd) or determination, have as good a record against the world’s greatest bowling attack as Gavaskar did.
In their careers, played at more or less the same time, Miandad averaged 29 against the West Indies and Zaheer Abbas only 18. I suspect Sachin Tendulkar would not have done well either, against the battery of Andy Roberts, Joel Garner, Michael Holding, Malcolm Marshall, Colin Croft, Wayne Daniel and Patrick Patterson. Gavaskar, without a helmet, averaged 65 against the most feared attack in history and took 13 centuries off them.
Over the years, especially after he retired, I knew that my hero was not perfect. There was the episode, 13 or so years ago, of cash found in his locker at Bombay Gymkhana. The newspaper I was then editing initially went slow on the story because its chairman was Gavaskar’s friend.
But his courage was intact. In his writing, he took on the hallowed Lord’s and the powerful Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). After the Indian Premier League (IPL) began, the Mumbai Mirror reported that Gavaskar and Ravi Shastri were on contract with the BCCI. They were being paid INR36 million a year, and this money was separate from their commentary and column writing contracts. So what are they being paid for? Kunal Pradhan, who originally reported the story, wrote this comment for the Economic Times, explaining the deal:
“In simple terms, the contracts mean that what you hear from Gavaskar and Shastri on TV and in their newspaper columns may not always be their own opinion, but often what the BCCI wants them to say. In the garb of professional media men, they act as spokesmen of the BCCI, protecting its interests on contentious issues such as the Decision Review System, and by highlighting umpiring mistakes that go against the Indian team while brushing aside those that go against the opposition.”
One of them, I think it was Shastri, defended this contract by saying it helped them see both sides. Does their behaviour validate this? Let’s have a look.
A couple of weeks ago, a scandal erupted in the IPL, the tournament that makes the BCCI the world’s richest cricketing body. Gavaskar’s response to player corruption and fixing in the IPL was to say: “I don’t understand how you can blame an organisation for what some individuals do. The BCCI does not have control over these players 24 hours in a day and for 365 days. It is just like any other organisation, there will be some bad people and you cannot blame that organisation. Everybody is going very harshly at the IPL just because three players out of a possible 270 have been caught so far, indulging in illegal activities.”
A few days later, the BCCI president’s son-in-law was named as one of those involved. At such a time, Gavaskar chose to write his column on the pressing matter of the intemperate language used by Australian player David Warner.
Gavaskar’s silence is shameful. He has become an embarrassment to his fans of decades and as I said, I am one of them. I am sorry to feel this, but I should have been with the Kapil Dev wallahs instead.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 2nd, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (51)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
BCCI used to be Board of Cricket Control in India. Now it has become Board of Corrupt Cricketers International. However, my favorite is Board of Cricket Corruption India!
This board should be banned from International Cricket immediately.
@Faraz
I agree with you word for word and I am not kidding; except that your thinly veiled attempt to paint Owaisi as someone from a comic book that dilutes the implications of his speech, stupid as it is, in more than one ways. It strengthens the arguments of the hindu right. It can potentially push those hindus who are moderately secular but not as grounded in their belief as we would like them to be, into the fold of the hindu right. The difference between him and Modi is that Modi could do what he wanted to do while Owaisi couldn't and thank heaven for that. But in mindset and in intention there is no difference between the two. Intention does count. There is a danger in taking such aberration lightly. Golwalkars and Savarkars only wrote a few pages and killed none. But proved to be quite a handful in inspiring Babu Bajrangis and Maya Kodnanis.
@Faraz:
Bravo!! The "Faraz"* would have approved, Faraz!
@Faraz:
What a master piece! You don't see such succinct eloquence very often.
@sid: Akbaruddin Owaisi conducted a pogrom where defenceless Hindus were put to the slaughter. His cohorts scrutinised voter lists and phone records to identify Hindu households and descended upon them like " the wolf upon the fold". They raped the women and eviscerated the men. They sang themselves hoarse as they did their gory work. Their songs reverberate in the minds and souls of the surviving Hindus and echo in the silences of Hindu crematoria. Just kidding, Owaisi, minor rabble rouser, major imbecile did none of that. Just invert the story, replace Owaisi by Modi and Hindus by Muslims and you should experience an epiphany real quick. Think before you speak is an age old adage. It survived the test of time because it is such good advice. I offer it to you free of charge.
Well, Gavaskar's not 'bound' to write on everything negative that happens in IPL or Indian cricket.
@Gp65:
In December he addresed a rally of his supporters he said that if the police stood apart for 15 minutes the 25 crore Muslims could kill 100 crore Hindus.
india seems to be full of nutters in every walk of life!
@gp65:
Spoken like a true indian american! As the adage goes, you can never take india out of an indian, even when they have US passports and can't even vote for the candidates they promote with their devout propaganda in these forums.
@gp65:
Spoken like a true indian american! As the adage goes, you can never take india out of an indian, even when they have US passports and can't even vote for the candidates they promote with their propaganda in these forums.
Never liked Gavaskar.... but then I'm certain Gavaskar has never heard of me........so we are even.
@Lala Gee: Running India does not require frequent trips to US and the Indian PM does not visit US without nan invitation - so it is unlikely that India would face any embarrassment on that score. Not sure whom you consider civilied but Japan government is collaborating with Modi led Gujarat in a big way and EU has revised its stand on Modi. If the US does ot change its stand, that is fine. He aspires to be PM of India not PResident of US.
@BlackJack:
"What is interesting (and rather funny) is how you jump to defend the person you DON’T know, and bring out some cockamamie story of self-defense for violence that he did not commit, just because of the sense of kinship you feel based on his name."
Any single word from my comment in Owaisi's defense? Is it just your flawed comprehension of simple English, or your irresistible compulsions to fuss around, though at the cost of your own credibility. By the way, you forgot to mention any acts of terrorism he committed. How many bomb blasts and how many people he killed in those incidents. And, more importantly, why he is still a freeman (if my guess is correct)?
@Lala Gee:
I always admire your posts.
Your posts are filled with jokes with impeccable timing.
Keep them coming. Good luck.
@Lala Gee, India is not like Pakistan. We do not care what US or any other country thinks of us too much. Modi will be elected or not elected based on his merits in the eyes of Indians, not based on what US or any other country thinks of him.
@Lala Gee:
Post-Godhra violence is just that. Whatever happened after the unprovoked and preplanned Godhra carnage. As to Owaisi acting in self-defence, Sir, as a Hyderabadi I suggest you not to speculate about things you are ignorant of.
@Lala Gee: I don’t know if Owaisi is a terrorist or simply acting in self-defense, Ok, now I believe that you really don't know who Akbaruddin Owaisi is, which in itself is hardly surprising. What is interesting (and rather funny) is how you jump to defend the person you DON'T know, and bring out some cockamamie story of self-defense for violence that he did not commit, just because of the sense of kinship you feel based on his name. And then you wonder why you guys have no credibility - too many people like you leap to defend terrorists without knowing anything about the incident or issue at hand. Note: You also don't know anything about Modi, but that is ok. I would advise that you worry about more serious immigration concerns of people back home - I don't think Modi is in a hurry to go anywhere, except maybe Delhi.
@Lala Gee
Do not worry about the USA allowing Modi to come on to the US soil. There is a saying that you are obviously not aware "The business of America is business". If Modi becomes the PM then the US will bend the protocol to invite him. After all the USA gains by doing business with India rather than with pakistan. A lot of americans are realizing that now after sinking billions of dollars into a bottomless pit called pakistan.
@Gratgy:
"@Lala Gee Who is this gentleman Akbarudin Owasi? Perhaps nobody!"
"Someone just like you"
Good to know. At last there is an Indian with integrity and clear thinking.
@Lala Gee:
"I don’t know if Owaisi is a terrorist or simply acting in self-defense, one thing, however, is beyond doubt that Modi is responsible for the deaths of several thousand innocent people."
You are right. You don't know. In fact, you know nothing.
"Regarding Modi becoming Prime Minister of India, it would be very interesting to watch this happen, as a man who is/was banned to enter in most of the the countries of the civilized world, including India’s strategic partner USA, for allowing genocide of his own citizens is elected by Indians to the post, and thus un-hiding to the world their real loathsome nature which is currently covered-up by the Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence."
You don't even know what you are talking about.
@Water Bottle:
"You are comparing one of the most successful chief-ministers of India to a terrorist .... Modi could become the PM of India one day."
I don't know if Owaisi is a terrorist or simply acting in self-defense, one thing, however, is beyond doubt that Modi is responsible for the deaths of several thousand innocent people. Regarding Modi becoming Prime Minister of India, it would be very interesting to watch this happen, as a man who is/was banned to enter in most of the the countries of the civilized world, including India's strategic partner USA, for allowing genocide of his own citizens is elected by Indians to the post, and thus un-hiding to the world their real loathsome nature which is currently covered-up by the Gandhi's philosophy of non-violence.
Mr. Aakar, candidly and honestly speaking, you're the only reason why I open ET website on Sundays. Keep your writings coming. They're really insightful and a treat to read. Regards and love from Lahore.
@VK Swamy:
"“Gavaskar is the Shahrukh Khan of Cricket and Ravi Shastri Ajay Devgun. Throw some money at Gavaskar, and throw a few cheerleaders towards Shastri. Both will be happy and can do anything.”"
That's unfair.
I consider Gavaskar and Shastry to be greedy and poodles of BCCI.
However, comparing them to Shah Rukh Khan and Ajay Devgan is like elevating Shah Rukh Khan and Devgan to the levels of human beings with brains.
Sorry to Shah Rukh and Ajay Devgan's fans, these two are buffoons and not actors. They have absolutely no talent. They have come to prominence because we are a country of a billion idiots.
On the contrary Shasrty and Gavaskar are talented. They came to prominence on the basis of their talent. Well, later on they sold themselves and became slaves to BCCI.
@Lala Gee Who is this gentleman Akbarudin Owasi? Perhaps nobody!
Someone just like you
@sid:
"similarly as some people write about Modi and remain shamefully silent on Akbarudin Owasi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Who is this gentleman Akbarudin Owasi? Perhaps nobody!
I suppose he is making up for earnings lost during his playing years. Back then cricketers weren't paid much.
@gp65: truth remind truth... by denying each and everything things don't get sacred.... and the truth is ALL ROADS TO MATCH FIXING LEADS TO INDIA AND BCCI..
@sid: agreed.... but it does not a search sunny of his shameful attitudes
@Noman Ansari: then why did PCB and even Park govt and people were termed as thievez when Pakistan trio were arrested.
Majority of the runs scored by Sunil Gavaskar against WI were in 1971 and 1976 or 1979 (minus Packer players) when the Windies pace attack was not at it's best. He certainly did not average 65 against Roberts Holding Croft Garner and Marshall during the 80's.
Ok, so let me get this straight.....
You, while a newspaper editor, knew of certain indiscretions committed by Gavaskar, and chose not to publish details, because you were earning your bread from the newspaper...yet...yet, you chose to accuse Gavaskar of not speaking up, knowing full well, that he earns his bread from the BCCI/IPL..
Really...what was that about 'good for the goose, should be good for the gander'!!
I am also big fan of Gavaskar and Kapil Dev. Kapil did not cooperate with BCCI and you can see what happened to him, at the end he has to bow down. Gavaskar being shrewed knew initially itself that there is no need to confront BCCI and he had all his finger in deshi ghee. Why blam him? Under current UPA gov. the only motto of everybody is to grab as much as you can without worrying about moral implication, he was smart enough to indentify it early.
Mr Patel has nailed it. Gavaskar and Ravi Shastri have sold their souls to BCCI. A friend recently put it this way. "Gavaskar is the Shahrukh Khan of Cricket and Ravi Shastri Ajay Devgun. Throw some money at Gavaskar, and throw a few cheerleaders towards Shastri. Both will be happy and can do anything."
@F: "As long as you are smooth and know English – you can afford to be cunning, play the system and rake in millions. If you are “desi” – salt of the earth but don’t speak English well, you get the crumbs." You have hit bull's eye! This is the difference between Miandad and Imran Khan and other cricketers like M. Yousuf. If you are English medium and foreign educated the elites and powerful would make you their voice. Smooth talking always works. Regards, M
Gavaskar conspired to defeat India many times- when he was not made captain. 1987 World cup springs to mind. So let us not discuss him. He is not the role model.
Sunil Gavaskar and Asif Iqbal are the FIRST obliging parents of bookies. Both of them were the first ones to give information about the pitch to the bookies when Pakistan toured India in 1980. We all know the allegations of Manoj Prabhakar against Kapil Dev. Ajay Jadeja, Mohammad Azharuddin, Salim Malik were banned for life for their activities. In recent memory, Pakistan
s failed tour of Australia three years ago was kind of fixed. Pakistani trio
s conviction in England, now fixed IPL matches, make me believe that I am watching a circus. Sachin Tendulkar is God for Indian cricket lovers, with due respect to this athlete, I have the right to know his occasional dismissals in the 90s between his 99th and 100th Century.SG is even my hero. Heroes lead, not follow their fans. So Mr. Patel can't tell what SG has to do. If you like him follow him. If you don't forget him. If he has fallen its your tragedy, not his. However from what I get from your article is that SG was never your hero in the true sense. He had a good following and had a high TRP. Whatever one wrote about him, sold. You as a journalist and an editor used his name to get better returns. (Similarly, even though he brought more titles to Pakistan than the whole of cricket, who writes about Jahangir Khan?. He does not sell). How many articles did Mr. Patel write about the great Indian athlete PT Usha? Here too you, Mr. Patel, are using his name to get your article printed.
@sid:
"similarly as some people write about Modi and remain shamefully silent on Akbarudin Owasi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
I agree with the principle of your comment.
But, I am disgusted by the content of it.
You are comparing one of the most successful chief-ministers of India to a terrorist who openly called for slaying of Hindus. Also Owaisi is a third rated politician, whose influence does not transcend the locality in which he lives. Modi could become the PM of India one day.
So, Aakar is right in ignoring Owaisi. Though Aakar's criticism of Modi often comes across as unfair.
Another point about 'chill'er parties and the 'cool'er dudes who shamelessly say "cool down, just chill, it's just entertainment".
Unfortunately in India (I don't know about Pakistan) the words like cool and chill have come to mean and being used in something like one of the following :
1) You jumped traffic light and reached your home in 10 mins and the cop was whistling but you didn't stop? That's so cool, man.
2) You did a business worth 10 rupees and charged 1,500? Wow! Cool.
3) Just chill, dude, I will slip in 50 bucks to the cop and make the traffic ticket disappear.
4) He talked back to me and I beat his * up. Ain't that so cool?
5) You lied to your parents and went out to a hill station with your boyfriend? How cool is that?
Don't be disgusted by what I am about to say (ET, there's nothing ugly about what I have to write here) : I can imagine the Delhi gang-rapists saying "cool dude, it's entertainment" even as they committed those horrible crimes.
India has become a huge slum. A huge slum of mind and matter. Sometimes, I feel disgusted to call myself an Indian.
IPL is damaging cricket, and Indian cricket in particular. India had a very decent Ranji circuit which produced several greats for them. IPL is just promoting greed and a brand of cricket which is anything but cricket! Sad to see players like Viv and Gavaskar supporting this mess.
The IPL tamasha and now its rottened underbelly are both accurate portrayals of the modern indian society--cool on the outside, corrupt to the bone on the inside! No one has done more damage to global morality in the spheres of politics and sports than the indian "geniuses" who have burrowed their way into these institutions from Washington to Mumbai.
You ran out of ideas. I am no fan of Gavaskar (except the batsman he is) but he is right when he says it is impossible for any sporting body to keep watching hundreds of players, officials etc. 24X7 365 days. Are you going to hold the Election commission accountable if people are caught betting on election results? There is only so much one can do.
Gavaskar worships money. If he shakes your hand he will ask for money.
Standing up against a fast delivery is completely different than standing up for a truth. No cricketer has done it before and no cricketer will do it in future. A sportsman cannot be a Hero.
similarly as some people write about Modi and remain shamefully silent on Akbarudin Owasi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As long as you are smooth and know English - you can afford to be cunning, play the system and rake in millions. If you are "desi" - salt of the earth but don't speak English well, you get the crumbs.
Poor Kapil, feel sorry for him. His choice of IPL's rival did him in. BCCI simply ground him into the ground....
While I agree that Sunil Gavaskar is a paid representative for the BCCI, and often acts as a mouthpiece for their agenda, I think you are being a bit harsh on him here. Nothing about the following statement seems unreasonable:
The Board of Cool Cricket in India (BCCI) will not tolerate these preposterous allegations against Sunil Gavaskar.
and Sunny responded very differently when Pakistan trios were found involved in spot fixing not very long ago.