Amid hopes that talks for the normalisation of trade with India will restart once the PML-N’s pro-business government assumes power, the European Union (EU) urged Pakistan on Wednesday to review its policy of giving preference to trading with the EU and instead focus on trade with India.
“Pakistan’s largest trading partner should not be the EU, it should be your neighbours – in particular, India,” EU’s Head of Delegation to Pakistan Lars-Gunnar Wigemark said while speaking at the third international conference on the role of competition in fostering trade and investment.
He also advised Pakistan to become a regional champion for competition by opening its borders for trade and investment without harbouring any fears. Wigemark said Pakistan enjoys a unique position as it is located at the intersection of one of the oldest trading routes in the world, and is blessed with a “talented people, ready to work hard to realise their dreams.”
The comments made by Wigemark came on the heels of would-be prime minister Mian Nawaz Sharif’s stated resolve to improve relations with India. However, the military establishment is said to have advised Sharif to go slow on the issue.
The trade normalisation process, which was started early in 2011, was put on the backburner after the military establishment asked the previous government to link trade normalisation with composite dialogue. India’s reluctance to provide a level playing field to Pakistani exporters also silenced many pro-trade voices in Pakistan.
Wigemark said the economic benefits of regional integration are well-documented. He said Pakistan’s trade with the EU accounted for about 20% of its total trade in 2012: the EU received 21% of Pakistan’s total exports, whereas 17% of Pakistan’s imports comprised of EU-manufactured products. The current volume of trade between the EU and Pakistan stands at 8.2 billion euros.
Wigemark also had a message for the new government: “Be inspired by the recent elections and create a truly level economic playing field for business in Pakistan,” he said. He said the new government enjoys a strong political mandate, which it should use to get rid of problems such as cartels, price-fixing, distorting subsidies and kickbacks.
Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) Chairperson Rahat Kaunain Hassan, on the occasion, warned that the establishment of the International Clearing House (ICH) in the telecom industry had reversed the gains achieved through deregulation of the telecom sector.
She said the ICH was in violation of the Competition Act, and said the arrangement is based on price fixing and revenue sharing based on a pre-agreed quota, which is against competition laws.
“The country has reverted to a retrogressive policy due to the ICH,” she observed. “The ICH fixed and raised the price of calls from an average 2.2 cents to a uniform rate of 8.8 cents. The sharing of revenues was based on a fixed percentage through quotas,” she added, “For the Commission, this was an open and shut case of cartelisation,” she said. The Commission had imposed a penalty equivalent to 7.5% of turnover on long distance international (LDI) operators, which is estimated to total over Rs10 billion.
She revealed that, based on data provided by the sector-specific regulator, there has been a huge reduction in the volume of incoming traffic. However, despite the reduction in incoming traffic by 70% – from 1.9 billion minutes in September 2012, to 578 million minutes lately – the revenue of LDIs has increased by 308%.
Similarly, monthly revenues of the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority have decreased from $24.4 million to $16.7 million after the ICH arrangement. Kaunain warned that the ICH was resulting in an increase in gray traffic, and that the country was being isolated at the international front.
The US Federal Communication Commission has already ordered US companies to not pay any termination rates to Pakistani carriers in excess of the rates in effect prior to the ICH agreement.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 30th, 2013.
Like Business on Facebook to stay informed and join in the conversation.
COMMENTS (70)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Sinclair: However, I disagree with your comment greatly.
@Sinclair: As always a great comment from you. Haven't seen any from you in a while...
@Another North Indian
RK Sharma....."You are insulting him by confusing him for a Pakistani."**
Surely Mr. Sharma made a mistake and it is at best embarassing for him as well as for @Zalmai. But is it insulting to be a Pakistani per say?
RK Sharma, Zalmai is a very level-headed Afghan. He has been to India and knows India very well. You are insulting him by confusing him for a Pakistani.
@Akraman
@confucius: "it,s childish comment, india was ruled by few muslim family not by muslim,
I like it. It works both ways. It provides the overtly hurt hindus a consolation and frees the muslims from a misplaced guilt complex.
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-03-03/news/374103781middle-class-global-consultancy-deloitte-consumer-market
This research is conducted by Deloitte and the per capita income is going to grow many times in the next 20 years.
When that happens, the poor become middle class and the middle class becomes very rich
@Rex Minor:
I prefer facts to do the talking. India has the largest middle class in the world at 300-400 million people.
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-05-30/news/396030301gdp-growth-third-largest-economy-economic-growth-projection
The difference between growth rates of China and India is negligible and only 1 % percent.
FDI in India is the second highest after China.
With the growth rate that we have ,we will be creating a middle class of 600 million by 2025
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-03-03/news/374103781middle-class-global-consultancy-deloitte-consumer-market
We have a big population and it wont be overnight before we bring out all our poor to middle income.
The long term prospects of India are the strongest in the world better than China.
You touched upon the point of buying weapons. Its an integral part of our security. India needs to spend much more on weapons than we are currently.
In fact i would say that nuclear weaponisation of India and Pak has got the region much needed security otherwise we would have fought another war
Ram Krishan Sharma Ji : . Your Post : Most of the Pakistani people ( about 95% )..........Please note at today’s rate of exchange , 1 Indian rupee = 2 Pakistani rupee. . Wishful thinking my friend! The Mojority of Indians might agree with you, but, sadly it will never happen. . More's the Pity. . Cheers
@confucius: it,s childish comment, india was ruled by few muslim family not by muslim,
@Zalmai: Most of the Pakistani people ( about 95% ) are descendents of Hindus converted to Islam over a period of time exceeding 1000 years. Thus they are related to North Indian Hindus by blood , DNA and race . You are not Arabs or Turks. The land which became Pakistan in 1947 , has been sacred to Hindus for the past 5,000 years . Even today Hindus recite the names of All the rivers and mountains of Pakistan in their daily prayers. Therefore , why not there be trade between the members of the same family, ie India and Pakistan.? Once the tourism between the two countries starts , millions of Hindus , Budhists and Sikhs will visit their sacred places left behind after partition , thus bringing a lot of tourist income to Pakistan. Please note at today's rate of exchange , 1 Indian rupee = 2 Pakistani rupee.
@Bharat:
Pardon me sir, India has the potential but at prsent it is the poorest!! Too many to feed and very few to create; Indian Government is squandering money on weapon imports! Perhaps the new Bharat will emerge one day, when it has peace in the land ?
Rex Minor
at least please allow pakistan mangoes to be imported to india,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,it is the best.
@Rex Minor:
The second biggest consumer market is India after China.
Let the people of Pakistan know that the so called EU envoy does not represent the people of Europe, but the Euopean commission made up of civil servants. I can understand his concerns, with the recession in the south european economies and the higher rate of youth unemployment, it fears massive immigration from India whose economy is unable to sustain its youth, the largest in the world. The biggest consumer market namely China should be preferable for both India as well as Pakistan, instead of the trade between one banana export to another banana export country!
Rex Minor
@confucius: First learn to spell before you dream. (Lose vs Loose)
The biggest problem is that Pakistan did not develop its indigenous industries and if you see very few industries developed since independence.
Textiles is the only that i know.
If a country does not develop,then trade will go only one way since there is no choice.
In India ,now every possible industry is developed be it Automobiles,pharma, hospitals, hotels, machinery ,textiles, mining etc and so on
Pakistan needs to call back all educated pakistanis to work for the country and develop it.
No foreigner will keep on giving aid to Pakistan forever .
Most Pakistanis should understand that even China or Iran will only exploit the conditions since there are few local industries in Pakistan.
This fact can not be overlooked or neglected and its not surprising that there is very less economic growth in Pakistan in the absence of industry
@Sh. Kh: . I don’t think India will do business with Pakistan as it is linking India to Afghanistan and Central Asia via Chabahar an Iranian Port it will develop with an investment of 100 million USD. . Sir Ji, Chahbahar Port is in existence since the early 1980s and India is only "Modernizing" it to the extent of possible Deepening as well as providing Higher capacity Cranes. . India wants to use the Port of Chahbahar as Pakistan is a "Moody" neighbour which will withdraw the Transit Facilities AT THE DROP OF A HAT. . Cheers
. @gp65 : . Some imposter is telling I did not write the post. I wrote it and I am fully conscious. Anyone who disagrees can ask me for references. Thank you! . M'Lady : Please send me you E-Mail Address at enkay0001@gmail.com and I will explain to you why the "Long Message" could not emanate from you. . Trust Moderators will permit my request for E-Mail Address. . Many thanks in advance . Cheers
@confucius:
ROTFLMAO!!!!! This is the funniest thing I have ever heard.
You ruled India?!!!!! That too for 1,000 years. Do you even know who you are and what your native identity is?!!! Who are you trying to fool?!!! Hiding behind a "muslim" tag does not mean you can hide yourself. "Muslim" is not a race or ethnicity, but a religious following which anyone can become. All people of Pakistan and the Indian subcontinent are converts and not native muslims like the Arabs.
Pakistan is the converted Punjabis, Sindhis, Baloch and Pashtuns, who themselves were ruled by and converted forcibly by the Arab Caliphate when they conquered the provinces of Multan and Sindh in 700 AD. India was ruled by Turks (Khiljis, Lodis and Mughals) who came from northern Iran and Uzkekistan, that too for only 450 years (1250-1700 AD), not 1,000 years.
It is Pakistan which was ruled by muslims (Arabs, Turks and Afghans) for 1,000 years from 700-1700 AD.
You should stop taking history lessons from your madrassa and read the real history considering that you have access to the internet.
@sm
How do you know it's 'Zeeshan'? It could be 'Lala Gee' too!
@Confucius
The Afghans would beg to differ on your delusional one thousand year rule over India. It was the Afghans and their Mongol Uzbek brethren that ruled in parts of India. How do you figure in that calculation. Are you Afghan or Uzbek and do you speak Pashto/Dari or Uzbeki/Chaghatai?
By the way, Babar (Zahir al Din) is buried in Kabul not in the Indian subcontinent.
@Yasin: Well you are able to do business because "bankrupt" EU is providing aid and softened trading barriers to Pakistan. If EU just put same taxes on Pakistan's textile exports, like it does to other countries, half of Pakistan's economy will wipe out in months.So yes, they do have the gals to lecture you. Question is , can Pakistan dare and afford , not to listen to the lectures coming from its donors?
@confucius: You're a funny man, u made my day...rofl
In my view the only way Pakistan can move forward are the followings;
Separate religion from politics and make state secular. Treat your minorities with equal respect and rights. Place army in barracks and Mullas in Mosques. Normalize relations with Afghanistan and India and develop Rail and Road links which existed during un-divided India. Focus on your own country before worrying too much about Palestine and other places. Stop dreaming of flying the Mughal flag again on Red Fort in Delhi.Its highly unlikely that Pakistan can move forward without addressing these issues.
@ask: UAE is a smuggling route -that cannot be considered legal trade, as it profits the smugglers more not India or Pakistan.
Pakistan's "feudal lords" are paranoid about being swamped by Indian goods. Where as Pakistani farmers, who are little better than serf's are not able to survive because they can't get a fair price for their produce. The Indian economy is HUGE - if Pakistan just concentrates on agriculture, Pakistan can make a hefty profit from trade with India but they don't because of perverse ideological opposition.
@kaalchakra: With due respect, India is not the one on life support. You have the option of trading your way out of the quagmire or going deeper. I can see that the wise heads have chosen the latter. Good luck.
@confucius: Keep dreaming and thank the British for terminating your rule and empires elsewhere.this power across the world is shrinking because the world is moving forward and you are getting left behind.You may catch up a few centuries later like Rip Van Winkle and it will be too late by then.so best to dream for now.
ET: The following post has NOT been written by me. It is by an impostor. Please remove "The world economy after the recent global recession was revived by India’s poweful 8600 trillion + economy. India is soon to surpass all the World’s economy put together. India’s exports products like state of the fighter jets (F-22 raptor), tanks (T-90), airspace equipment (NASA is 90% Indian), cars (Honda; Toyota; Ford; Jaguar; BMW etc), submarines, portable bridges, handheld roads, pocket sized river dams, cell phones (Nokia; Samsung); electronics (Toshiba, hp) etc etc. We don’t need Pakistan to trade with. The only problem is ever year illegal refugees come to India from Middle east, Europe and north america and pull down the economy"
this is a 'Asia pacific' century.the future belongs to Asia pacific region, there were are many routes which once played a great role in trade and economics, most are dead now.They played their role during their prime time,times change. have you changed with it or still stuck in the past?It is now the oceans that have become the important trading routes.
yep.....but most are misguided, used by political parties etc etc.
One sentence from 'Confucious' was enough to send half a dozen Indians in to a silly tizzy. The wise guy must be gigling away! Indo-pak direct, official trade is not very attractive to many Indian exporters except for those involved in perishables. UAE is a major importer of Indian merchandise & that is because whatever Indian produce is needed in Pakistan is routed through that gateway. Some legally,some clandestinely. Cost of frieght is not a major consideration since customs duties, bribes are saved & mark ups are huge. Pakistan however is a big loser in the bargain since not much of its traditional agrarian exports & cement can be sent that way.
@Khattak: Sorry, no respect for pakis in India!!
@Yasin: And get 900 million in investment in 20 years...hahahahah!!
@confucius WHO IS YOUR REAL DAD? AFGANI ?
@confucius: Spirit has led to 4 defeats with Hindu India.....hahahaha!!keep trying until Pak gets destroyed into 4 pieces...hahahaha!!Muslim ruling Hindus again ....hahahahahahahah!!Poor man should have limited dreams..!!
@Deepwater:
Also, emperor is wearing no clothes and in fact he wasn't even an emperor.
@confucius:
So you prefer single malts?
Good advice EU thank you. Pakistan will trade with India because it is in her interest. Pakistan needs to drop the outdated dogma.
@confucius: We don't care and if this is so then why India is dying and expecting for declaring itself the Most Favorite Nation by Pakistan????? Why not honest,sincere and time tested comrades China and Iran and why only India?????
so easily You called EU as broke People of France came out on the roads to protest against the new government when the employment rate rose to ..... 3% and seeing the population of france that total figure of 3% would be less than the number of unemployed youth being brainwashed by TTP and other mullahs in just the city of Peshawar
@confucius:
you ruled us for 1000 yrs....u muslims cant maintain a country whch we hindus gave you from our land.
but why would you listen to to EU,you pakistan have destined to doomed.
@ali
Tough luck, my friend. The choices have been made. Fasten your seat belt. The ride is only to get a lot tougher for pakistan. Call it bad KARMA.
No thanks. Please trade with your global ummah.
But that makes too much sense; we can't do that!
@Yasin: "So now even the bancrupt EU has the gal to advise us on how we shoud run our business. " ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Wondering who is more bankrupt: EU or Pakistan?
@kaalchakra I STRONGLY disagree with your comment.
@kaalchakra: As always, you have captured the crux of the issue, salutes !!!!! :-)
@Ali: Ouch!!, That would hurt many a pakistanis!!!
We should not even have diplomatic relations with India let alone trade.
No, thank you. Does Pakistan need any more terrorism? Let Kashmir be freed if India really need to trade with Pakistan.
ET: My post is fctual. What do you not like about it that you filtered it? @confucius: "Never ever. Emperor can trade with Emperor, not with subjects. We ruled them for 1000 yrs."
So did the emperors you talk about rule from Delhi or Islamabad? Who ruled whom? Oh and by the way India, Pakistan and Bangladesh have roughly similar number of Muslims - so it is unclear why you claim the Muslim rule in India to be Pakistan's rule over India. This is without even getting into whether the 1000 years myth that people in Pakistan have grown up with is true or not.
@confucius: first learn to spell - there is a difference between "loose" and "lose" for your information!
@confucius: Well as far as history goes, the last "Mughal" emperor died in a dingy room in Rangoon. Are you saying you are from that "Mughal" family? If not then you probably are a converted one either by force or by fear.And your pseudo name shows your love for your new Chinese masters :)
Please do it. Please let me see my country India. My grand parents came to Pakistan from India. Why should I suffer for their faults?
What is EU suggesting ? Trading with the enemy ? toba, toba !
@Yasin: China's Trade with Pakistan = $18 Billion China's Trade with India = $73.9 Billion
I guess your friends are more friendly with your enemies.LOL
@Yasin:
"China is bigger than the whole of EU"
So is India!
@confucius:
"We will rise again if only we don’t loose the spirit."
You have already lost it.
@confucius: . Never ever. Emperor can trade with Emperor, not with subjects. We ruled them for 1000 yrs. Times have changed but the spirit is same. We will rise again if only we don’t loose the spirit. . Indian Population is about Six Times Pakistani Population - which is about 210 Million now as it was over 197 Million in 2011 - and has Nine Times the Economy. . NEVER FORGET - INDIA does not go around the World with a "Begging Bowl" in each Hand . The Real CONFUCIUS said : The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions! . PAKISTAN SHOULD NOT TRADE WITH INDIA. If Pakistan allows free Trade to India then Imports from India will Destroy Pakistani Industries just as the FREE TRADE WITH CHINA DESTROYED OVER THIRTY PAKISTANI INDUSTRIES!! . You take care, you hear!!! . Cheers
@Yasin: "They should know that China is bigger than the whole of EU and we do business with China." So do they and so does rest of the world. What's your point?
@confucius: "Never ever. Emperor can trade with Emperor, not with subjects. We ruled them for 1000 yrs."
Ummm...the Mughal Emperor sat in Delhi not in Isamabad or Karachi and India has as many Muslims as Pakistan. So what is the basis of your claim that Pakistan has ruled India for 1000 years?
As for choosing to give MFN or not, has it occurred to you, that if this was as important to India as you think it is, it could go to WTO and enforce it, since this is a basic requirement of WTO membership that each country has to give all other WTO members an MFN status. Pakistan has draged its feet for 16 years and India has let it slide. That should tell you something.
@Yasin: Good to put it this way, that the chinese do trade with us, and has completely captured out markets, forced closed our small and medium sector, have complete control on all our important segments like telecom, power, ship, ports, rail, military, cars, garments, ..... the list goes on. Open your eyes, and see that from dawn to dusk, you are surrounded by cheap chinese products flooding our markets and turning us a meager colony.. So who is the emperor and who is the subject now ?
I don't think India will do business with Pakistan as it is linking India to Afghanistan and Central Asia via Chabahar an Iranian Port it will develop with an investment of 100 million USD. Now they have a direct link to do business in Afghanistan and Central Asia. EU knows that and our strategic link to Central Asia is lost because of Iran's agreements with India. India - Iran - Afghanistan - Central Asia Business Route will see a huge trade flow, naturally India will have more presence in Afghanistan and Central Asia's landlocked resource rich areas.
@Yasin, actually it is us who are begging EU to give us special quota for exports. Though it is against ideology of Pakistan to trade with idea but this may be the only option. Our choice to beg IMF/WB/IDB for loan & spent it on low quality imports from China or have respectable trade with India for the mutual benefits.
They want much more than trade......a pound of flesh.
@confucius really 1000 years? I can refute your stupid comment by facts. But i will keep it short. Your statement is like a Indian Christian or Pakistani Christian saying we ruled you for 200 years.
@Yasin You are doing business with China, and they realize you have nothing to offer to them apart from towels and undies which is called by a fancy name called Textiles. And China is not bigger than EU. EU's economy is nearly $18 trillion whereas China is around $8 trillion.
@Yasin: Or, is it that EU’s Head of Delegation to Pakistan Lars-Gunnar Wigemark has invested in a big way in Indian companies?
yes they are right. they have invested in india and they also dont want us to dump their market with cheap goods. but our insane leaders will never understand this...
So now even the bancrupt EU has the gal to advise us on how we shoud run our business. They should know that China is bigger than the whole of EU and we do business with China.
Never ever. Emperor can trade with Emperor, not with subjects. We ruled them for 1000 yrs. Times have changed but the spirit is same. We will rise again if only we don't loose the spirit.