As the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) forms government at the centre and in Punjab, the leadership of the party in Gilgit-Baltistan (G-B) has hinted at replacing the governor with one from the PML-N.
“I think the governor should be someone from the PML-N,” Hafizur Rahman, G-B president of PML-N told journalists in his office on Sunday. “And we will have a word over it very soon.”
He shot down suggestions of toppling the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP)-led G-B government ahead of time, saying the ‘Mehdi Shah administration’ should be given a fair chance to complete its term, which ends in 2014.
“We hope [in the polls] the result of the PPP government and its allies in G-B will be no different from those in the rest of the country,” said Rahman, referring to the dismal performance of the PPP in the general elections.
Pir Karam Ali Shah, a PPP stalwart from Ghizer Valley, is the current governor of G-B. The PPP is the ruling party in the area with the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl, Muttahida Qaumi Movement, and Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid as coalition partners.
In order to fix discrepancies in the system, Rahman asserted a strong governor, free from party biases, was the need of the hour; but at the same time he pushed for a governor from the PML-N.
“There is no accountability system to check corruption in the region and we need to establish such a system,” he said.
The PML-N G-B chief said all development programmes being run in Punjab would be extended to G-B to improve the regional economy, which suffers from a shortage of funds.
Rahman expressed his desire to strengthen G-B’s ties with Punjab, stating relations with Khyber- Pakhtunkhwa only gifted negatives such as arms and ammunition to the region.
As party celebrations continue, people from all over the region flocked to the PML-N regional office to offer congratulations over the party’s landslide victory.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 13th, 2013.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ