“If you are predicting the 2013 elections of Pakistan, ignore the polls and analysis of political brains, switch off your television sets, and follow the supercharged Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE). I know this is absurd for any Pakistani, but just give it a shot. At least this is what any average American must have done in case of elections,” Sam Stovall, chief equity strategist at the Standard and Poor 500 (S&P500), recently told me in an email conversation.
In the US economy, the stock market has been found as one of the best predictors of the outcomes of an election. For instance, a year ago, the market precisely predicted that President Barack Obama should be re-elected. According to Stovall, since 1948, the S&P500-index has proved to be a sound prognosticator of whether or not an incumbent president gets to be re-elected. Since 1900, the US stock market has predicted the results of elections with 90% accuracy. Of the 28 elections in the US since then, the incumbent was re-elected 15 out of 16 times when the stock market went up before elections. The candidates lost in re-election 10 out of 12 times when the market went down preceding elections.
That the stock market may be able to indicate which way an election will swing makes sense: the stock index is a reflection of investors’ sentiments, with the market going up when confidence is high and down when investors do not hold a positive outlook. If we just observe the index, it shows whether an economy is, or will be, doing good in the near future. This makes sense in terms of economic and mathematical analysis.
But the question arises whether such an analysis is applicable to our markets or not, for which purpose I canvassed students studying finance and their professors to take their opinions.
I surveyed around 150 students from the Lahore University of Management Sciences (Lums) who have some knowledge about our markets. I talked to students from different majors, ranging from economics, accounting and finance, to political science and mathematics. 78% of respondents agreed to the fact that Pakistan’s stock market is more like an elite casino, where only very few can play and make money. And, according to 90% of the students surveyed, the correlation between the stock market and the elections hardly holds in the case of Pakistan.
Our market capitalisation-to-GDP in 2011 was 15.5%, according to the World Bank. In contrast, India, Sri Lanka and China’s were 54.9%, 32.8% and 46.3%, respectively. According to an estimate by the Central Depository Company (CDC) of Pakistan, a little over 300,000 people hold trading accounts with the CDC. Out of these 300,000 investors, only about 37,000 can be categorised as active traders. Hence, in some respects, Pakistan’s stock market is still way behind many other countries’.
“I don’t believe that the market is doing good all on its own, and I do not believe it to be a true reflection of our economy. Something is wrong with it,” Dr Hammad Siddiqui, a professor at Lums and a fellow of the Centre of Economics Research of Pakistan, told me.
“Tough to answer, but Pakistan’s stock market has always been a myth for many and a straight game for the few. You just look around at indicators like unemployment, prices and the country’s condition, to get a fair idea ... You know what you can see,” said Muhammad Basharullah, another professor at Lums and an ex-Merrill-Lynch employee, when asked if he believed the stock market to be a reliable indicator of the economy.
For now, I cannot seem to reach any concrete conclusions on whether the soaring stock market can be the predictor of the outcome of Pakistan’s elections like its US equivalents, or whether our markets can really make any economic and mathematical analysis fail.
The writer is studying Economics and is interested in Financial Markets and Entrepreneurship
Published in The Express Tribune, March 11th, 2013.
Like Business on Facebook to stay informed and join in the conversation.
COMMENTS (28)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Good One. Kudos to the author!
Great!!
I think author never intends to claim that people are going to re-elect the same government, he just tried to make connection between elections and soaring stock market-performance. After all, why this index is going up all of a sudden before elections...quite a shot . Kudos to author !! Keep writing . Your last one, A night with her, was amazing too !!
nabeel, you made a nice link between us and pak stock market, but i don't think that people will reelect the current government.... lets see what is going to be happened....
Stock market a casino....perfection !! :)
Level !!
Brilliant.
You with your wits, indirectly, but somehow managed to lay down the main problem in our market. Well done!
Bravo...unique analysis :)
Nice analysis. lets see what will happen in the future.....
Commendable. Excellent analysis young man !
I fully agree that KSE 100 is not a stock market; it is like an in-house gambling in a rundown area {like Ghas Mandi). The academic rhetoric does not apply here. I haven’t noticed the directives frequently issued by an effective regulatory body governing the stock market.
When someone loses, someone else wins. The stock market is deliberately manipulated to ensure the rich get richer whilst the poor get poorer
KSE doesnt rely on political unstability its already prone to these mishaps.Rich are already making plenty of tax free money in Pakistan
Simply brilliant.
PPP is a political backwater of Pakistan consigned firmly to the history bin, never to resurface and be center of attention again. It will be the ancient whig party of England the USA whose mention will only be found in books as tales and yarns of past.
The new, emerging and the only democratic party of Pakistan, PTI, is what is the present and the future of Pakistan.
I wish this analysis should not be applicable to the case of Pakistan. One more for PPP would kill us !!...however, excellent piece . Best of luck Nabeel.
Interesting Analysis - A truly neutral analysis of Pak political and economic situation.
Excellent way of presenting the truth ...from U.S.
good one ...
Perfect Analysis...Excellent writing, kudos to the author...
If the academics do not trust the players in the stock market? Who is to be blamed these experts or the people who's money is at stake.
I am neither a finance professional nor my personal money is at stake, but I am reader business page of ET: I have read two major factors for bullish trend of the market, namely interest of foreign investors and exceptionally high corporate earnings.
Lest us wait for the election results and see whether our voters are matured enough to follow the sentiments of the stock market while casting their vote, Instead of making their comparison to one of the most sophisticated voters and stock markets.
The business acumen of the traders at stocks market all around the globe is same according their environments. They invest with objectives to earn as per rules of the game prevalent in the market, its behavior and techniques irrespective of the professional literacy levels. The less literate dealers with full mouth of Pan in addition to young or well dressed professionals qualified from big name institutions; are daily standing on the floor of KSE and sitting behind the dealing screen taking instant decisions and set the market behavior. Perhaps, the professors at the universities analyze the market based on their bookish knowledge that is why most of them do not understand the recent market behavior.
A Peshawary
Pakistani stock market is complete farce. We have a very weak Security and exchange comission, a non performing competition commission and then we have the monopoly of a few brokers in the stock market that manipulate it for their own good. The stock market is nothing more than a gambling den in pakistan since it is controlled. It does not reflect the economic situation of the country and the government must do something to regularize it.
Well the difference lies in the fact that the economy has a different representation of sectors, whereas, the stock market has a different composition in its Index. Plus the fact that, the market capitalization of the stock is a small chunk of the GDP, making it impervious to changes in economic growth.
I don't think this is accurate. Not all 28 elections in the US since 1900 have involved the incumbent president, maybe it is true for the incumbent party?
There are numerous videos in youtube by Pakistani financial experts who compare our SE with a complete farce. This bourse unlike others are completely non regulated, where black money, money laundering, and dubious accounts are rampant. All this black money goes out to dubai, and is reinvested in dubious stocks hold companies of govt agents and establishment, who uses this route to bring back money as white. Its shameful.
watch out for falling objects:"What Looks Like A Rally May Just Be The Elites Passing Money Among Themselves"
So we are to believe that the stock market is predicting that the PPP will win the election. After all that has happened? What a nightmarish scenario!