ICAP silent about Rs25m penalty by CPP

Accountancy body was penalised by CCP for restricting training of non-ICAP students.


Kazim Alam February 22, 2013
ICAP has not paid the penalty even after one and a half months of the CCP order.

KARACHI:


Irish playwright George Bernard Shaw considered silence to be the most perfect expression of scorn. Apparently, top officials of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) agree with Shaw, as they continue to keep mum about the January 10 order of the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP), which imposed a penalty of Rs25 million on the premier body of chartered accountants for restricting the training of non-ICAP accountancy students by its approved training organisations.


ICAP has not paid the penalty even after one and a half months of the CCP order. Neither has it approached a competent forum to appeal against the order so far. Despite repeated attempts made over the last month, no ICAP official showed willingness to come on the record about the institute’s future course of action to deal with the heavy fine imposed by the anti-trust watchdog.

“I cannot tell you right now whether we are going to pay the penalty or file an appeal against the order,” ICAP Secretary Shoaib Ahmed said while speaking to The Express Tribune last month. He was not available for comment this time.

However, in background conversations with The Express Tribune since the CCP order was passed, officials as well as members of ICAP have claimed that paying the penalty is “out of the question” because the institute’s management still believes it is its right to protect the interests of ICAP students.



“Our students aren’t getting training opportunities that they deserve. Although it’s been going on since 1994, it’s gotten much worse in recent years,” one ICAP official said but requested anonymity because he did not want to be seen talking about the issue publicly.

He was referring to ICAP’s rival accountancy body, the UK-based Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, which came to Pakistan in 1994.



The CCP imposed the Rs25 million penalty on ICAP while declaring that a July 2012 directive of ICAP that asked its member organisations not to engage non-ICAP students as interns or trainees had no legal basis.

Under Section 42 of the Competition Act 2010, the appeal against an order of the CCP can be filed with the Competition Appellate Tribunal within 60 days of the communication of such order. The CCP does not pursue the recovery of penalty until expiry of the time available for filing of appeal. If ICAP continues to violate the CCP order, it will be liable to pay a penalty of Rs1 million everyday afterwards.

According to an official of the CCP, who also did not want to be named because of possible legal implications, the CCP may recover the amount from ICAP under Section 40 of the Competition Act, which includes the recovery of amount as arrears of land revenue or attachment of property.



In addition to the penalties prescribed under the Competition Act, the CCP can also initiate court proceedings against ICAP for failing to comply with its order, as it constitutes a ‘criminal offence,’ the source noted.

“Several accountancy students have approached the CCP to enquire about ICAP’s compliance with the matter. On receipt of any actionable evidence that suggests non-compliance with the order, the CCP will proceed against ICAP in accordance with the law,” the CCP official added.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 23rd, 2013.

Like Business on Facebook to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (5)

Major Sahab | 11 years ago | Reply

ICAP is clearly wrong even if it file's an appeal it would lose because it doesn't have strong reasonable basis to defend its point. It can't limit competition by creating monopoly. Its like PTCL an UFONE taking over the market and not allowing other operators to operate.

A similar case "Wateen -DHA" case happend in Lahore. Wateen tried to be over smart like ICAP taking over the market creating monopoly. Thankfully CCP came and issued ordered fined Wateen & DHA and relieved residents of DHA Lahore.

I hope CCP makes ICAP an example by collecting million a day after which no company will act in such a way.

Thank You CCP, Thank u President Pakistan Sir Asif Ali Zardari for making CCP stronger after signing a bill in 201O or 2011 giving CCP powers.

Ahmed Umair | 11 years ago | Reply

@jameel ur Rasheed

If you had read the order of CCP dated January 10 (a 42 page comprehensive fact finding report) you would infer clearly if CCP has ignored ICAP's point of view or whether ICAP has acted ignorantly. ICAP was given complete six months to prove that they had the authority to pass such a notification under there own charter and legislation's. Furthermore commenting on your point of view that "every country and accounting institutes protect its members " i can only say that if protection was really needed ICAEW would be a highlighted savior but ironically when ICAEW's opinion was sought by CCP regarding ICAP's notification

This is what they had to say: a. there is a strong demand from practice and business to ensure that they are able to develop their staff in order to be able to compete internationally; b. there is a significant demand from school leavers and graduates in Pakistan to gain an internationally recognized professional qualification; c. ICAP‟s directive appears to place protectionism above both the professional and national interests and we would suggest that these are better served by strengthening the profession in Pakistan through maintaining an open environment to encourage continual investment and improvement.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ