Civilian court: Eight men convicted by military court to face fresh trial

Earlier charged for involvement in 2003 attack on Musharraf convoy.


Mudassir Raja December 18, 2012

RAWALPINDI:


Eight former army and air force officers, earlier convicted by a military court over their involvement in the 2003 suicide attack on former president Pervez Musharraf, are likely to face a fresh trial in a civilian court.


The Anti-Terrorism Court in Rawalpindi has been awaiting a response from the Punjab home department to initiate the trial in this regard.

Seven of the convicts were handed down the death penalty by a Field General Court Marshal FGCM in 2004 for their role in the twin attacks on the official convoy of President Musharraf near Jhanda Chichi on December 25, 2003, killing 15 people mostly passersby.

The army court had rejected their appeals against the convictions, saying that they could not get any relief from the superior judiciary, including the Supreme Court.

the

The men – Ghulam Sarwar Bhatti, Arshad Mehmood, Ikhlas Ahmed, Zubair Ahmed, Rana Naveed, Amir Sabeel and Adnan and Rashid Ali – have been shifted to Adiala Jail from different prisons, after the Civil Lines police sought permission for a jail trial after submitting investigation report against them.

Prosecution has argued that the men were tried and convicted for mutiny and waging war against the army and could be tried for terrorism, murder and use of explosives.

Earlier, the ATC had acquitted a woman, Shazia Mubashir, after her lawyers maintained she was earlier tried by a military court and was acquitted in the same case and could not be tried again.

The next date of hearing for the case is set for December 20, when it will
be determined whether the convicts can be tried in the jail or not.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 18th, 2012.

COMMENTS (2)

Hamid Hassan Khan | 11 years ago | Reply Blood of Shaheed Benazir waiting for justice yet....!
Karim | 11 years ago | Reply

seems these people will be acquitted eventually on lack of substantial evidence.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ