The judgment is indeed historic in more ways than one. The Supreme Court has clearly and in unambiguous terms held that the Khakis have no role in politics and they have in the past breached the Constitution in manipulating elections. It is impossible to overstate the significance of this. The delight is not so much from hearing it, since most of us knew that for some time and even the generals involved were arrogant enough to repeatedly say this. It is from hearing the Supreme Court say this. Take a bow, My Lords. Air Marshal Asghar Khan and his brilliant lawyer Salman Akram Raja deserve our gratitude.
I do not want to be a spoilsport here. However, the order could have at least expunged the service record of the two generals and asked for all retirement privileges to be withdrawn immediately. Similarly, asking the federal government to investigate, while perfectly legally justifiable, deviates from the standard practice of the past few years, during which the Court has left very little to chance. Perhaps, a judicial commission could have been formed. We have seen the Supreme Court can, when it wants to, send elected prime ministers home without referring to the Election Commission of Pakistan. Continuing with the nitpicking, one may disagree with the conclusion that these were individual acts and not of the army and ISI as institutions. Especially since it reflects very poorly on the succeeding army and ISI chiefs who never thought it fit to have the matter investigated and clear the names of their institutions. The bringing in of the president’s role and political activity also is slightly discomforting. Since for sometime at the end there was the impression that the primary focus of a case where BB was illegally and unconstitutionally defeated was on president Asif Ali Zardari who, if anything, is a victim of the IJI; even if vicariously. The sceptic would still find cause for alarm on the observation on the dual offices of the president, which was originally not an issue. Nevertheless, much can be forgiven today. However today is not a day for cynicism; the Supreme Court has ruled against the chief of army staff and the DG ISI; Malala is on her way to recovery. We do not get many such days.
The onus is now on the federal government to prosecute the generals for treason and investigate the politicians named. I respect the senior citizens as much as the next person, yet I say without any feeling of guilt that seeing General Aslam Beg and General Asad Durrani behind bars would be a very happy moment. The coalition federal government has been weak in taking on the military establishment so far. However, with rejuvenated hopes I assume that the Court will be as vigilant and demanding as it was in the NRO case to ensure that the judgment is enforced in “letter and in spirit” and if the government displays reluctance to lock the two rogue generals, the Court will undoubtedly take matters in its own hands and do the needful.
Coming back to historical significance, the 1990 election was rigged, stolen; it is official now. The generals and the politicians involved did not only breach the Constitution, they betrayed us as a people. All politicians involved should be investigated. The heaviest burden lies on Mian Nawaz Sharif, the opening batsman of the IJI. Mian Sahib, if you have anything to apologise for, there is no time like now. Shaheed Benazir Bhutto stands vindicated today. The implications of this judgment are fairly severe, namely that Mian Nawaz Sharif cheated his way to first become the Prime Minister of this country. For starters, Mian Sahib should volunteer himself for accountability. All member parties of the IJI and their leadership owe an apology to the people of this country. Truth before reconciliation. Otherwise, a lot of lofty talk on “rule of law” and democracy would become nonsensical and dishonest.
The most heartening aspect of this judgment is that there is still hope for the history of this country to be corrected. The Asghar Khan case is a big milestone. However, there are many more on the road past. Mr Nasim Hasan Shah, one of the judges on the bench in the Zulfikar Ali Bhutto case, has already said on record that the verdict was delivered under pressure. This is admission of complicity in murder. Let him be summoned to court and at least publicly apologise. The Court has rightly observed that orders from superiors form no basis for violating the Constitution. There are many generals from the Zia and Musharraf eras who are still around, many have now reinvented themselves as champions of democracy, who should be summoned and tried and punished, even if they are to be token, symbolic punishments. General Hamid Gul takes indecent pride in his role in forming the IJI in furtherance of ‘national interest’ and if he is fit enough to attend and address DPC meetings, he should be able to stand trial. Then, there is the murder of BB and Nawab Akbar Bugti.
I know a lot of this is wishful thinking. The generals are unlikely to be imprisoned. However, it is a pleasurable imagination. And for once, it is for good reason. The short order of October 19, despite our little disagreements, is a good reason to be hopeful. Judgments and pieces of papers do not stop those mounting coups, their intrigues or armoured vehicles. However, it might have become slightly more difficult from now on for anyone to do so in the future. Here is to hope.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 21st, 2012.
COMMENTS (23)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Parvez: "If the 1990 election was rigged and stolen, then what about the 2008 election where 40% of the votes cast were acknowledged as bogus. "
I do not believe it is accurate that the vote was bogus. In fact the verified electoral roll by EC in 2008 elections was smaller than the 2002 rolls. This is not surprising given that many people had moved and their addresses could not be verified in a timely fashion. The courts ordered EC to include anyone in the electoral rolls who was part of the 2002 rolls. Thus EC complied with court orders and as a result had many people on its rolls whom it had not verified. To claim that this was a bogus vote is unfair. In any event, if there was as much as 40% bogus vote - as distinct from unverified vote - one would have expected a far better performance for PML-Q which was the king's party at the time of 2008 elections.
Very well expressed saroop! But the "boots" interfere with the ongoing democratic process! This is history and it will repeat itself unfortunately.
Aslam Beg & Nasir should be sent to Adiala prison & key thrown in Arabian Sea!
In my opinion the SC has given an extra constitunal decision. In this case the former late President GIK is the focal point,who was the supreme commander of armed forces and had vast powers under 8th amendment in 1990.It is his evidence which makes the issue legal or illegal. The court has declared him guilty by saying that it has been established that he has violated the constitution without hearing him/his contention /his side for an act done by him as the President. By the way, convicting a person without hearing him is the pretext on which the SC has set aside the conviction of Nawaz/ Shahbaz Sharif after more than 8 years.
Dearest saroop, Moral values and rules of law are applicable only to PP. every body else follows different set of rules. Nothing will happen though I have to appreciate decision was fair to some extent. If PPP had been beneficiary of this fiasco, you would have seen all your wishful thoughts as part of judgement. By bow all the PPP stalwarts had been imprisoned and media had been hounding them with morality lessons of khulfae rashdeen.
1971- Genocide against then citizens of Pakistan by its army and leaders? 1977- hanging of an elected PM by the army? 1974 - Coded discrimination in the Constitution against non Muslims and minorities?
Here is to hope. Well done judiciary. Cheers!
Following on the precedents (Memogate, Arsalangate etc), SC should form an independent Judicial Commission comprising of reputable retired SC/HC judges to probe and prosecute the culprits. Any action by federal government will be construed as score-settling, create bad blood and earn khakis' ire.
It was the Courts job to award exemplary punishment to the guilty. It has however shirked that job and passed it onto the Civilian Government knowing it is too weak to take any such decision.Why is there no such tolerance shown in any other judgments ?
The judgment is important in two respects for me; first, it has given a blow, a slight one may be, to the "holy cow" status of establishment, and second, it has exposed the corruption of those who use religion to enhance their political agendas. Lets hope it will prove a milestone in enlightening the masses and enhancing their realization of who the real culprits are for many of their problems and agonies.
I am impressed with the Supreme Court decision and as a citizen extremely grateful to the courts, Asgher Khan and his supporters who made this possible, finally a wrong is being righted and this may be just the beginning Pakistan needed.
Since the elections were rigged, does that not mean the elected Government then was also illegal and all their actions such as passing of legislation etc should also be revoked?
Politicians involved with establishment need to be tried in courts and be barred from any public office for life.
Thank you Asgher Khan, may you live a long life! Thank you Supreme Court of Pakistan for delivering justice!
A great and balanced Op Ed, thanks ET for that. It is profane to see some still trying to twist the crimes and make them look ordinary. These are the worst crimes by most rich and powerful in the country against the state and its people. It is not just a mistake by common men which can be seen with sympathy. This is high crime and high treason and none of the character has shown any remorse let alone apologize. Nothing would happen and I agree that the SC has giving this decision as a win win situation for itself.
Author perhaps forgot that Mian Nawaz Sharif was the most popular leader in 90's and could have won any election on his own. Ghulam Ishaq Khan and Mirza Aslma Beg were playing games to install their puppet which was Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi. It was Mian Nawaz Sharif which turned the tables on both and ruined their game plan. One more point. It was Mirza Aslam Beg, who made 1988 elections possible and that too on party basis. On the other hand, Supreme Court almost restored Junejo government. Please consider all aspects before judging history after two decades.
While your logic may be impecable, I fear it will come to nought.
Nicely written. Justice will been done once it is seen to have been done. If the 1990 election was rigged and stolen, then what about the 2008 election where 40% of the votes cast were acknowledged as bogus. Is there anything in all this that is not rotten to the core ?
the case has been thrown in the dust bin of history the politicians like shareefs have already made excuses and n body will be none the wiser tha court should hav convicted Nawaz shareef and ji chiefs immediately till the rising of the court!!!!
@Logic Europe: Do you really believe a strong judgement would have resulted in any action. This is the 'land of the pure' Several state institutions are unaccountable and untouchable.
sir,,your excitement is misplaced, judiciary has basically given a toothless judgement knowing well that no one is going to be prosecuted and that it may helpmtonrestorenthe tarnished immage of this PCO tainted partisan judiciary,
After many years but this verdict is worth slap on faces of those who played bad role and harmed democracy. Public beware of those who try to circumvent the process and try to discredit institutions. We need change. We should support people like Imran Khan to bring some credibility in our institutions.
Well written Saroop. Democracy didn't flourish due to role of army in our politics as well as few politicians who were readily available for sale. They are found today. It is more important that we unveil their real faces and don't repeat history.
Welldone SC and I am sure it is clear message to establishment that any future intervention will be exposed and opposed. Thumbs up.
@Author:
"The bringing in of the president’s role and political activity also is slightly discomforting"
Perhaps you'd only be satisfied if Supreme Court had specifically ordered to establish PPP's Central Secretariat in the President House and permitted the President to carry on his official duties while planning how to defeat PML(N) and PTI in the coming elections.