The motto of Indian dalit entrepreneurs to “fight caste with capital” is as profound as it is startling. Members of the Dalit Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DICCI) got together at a convention in Lucknow, on October 14, to give effect to the dictum by formally endorsing the Union government’s decision to allow foreign capital in multi-brand retail and welcoming big corporations of the world to do business in India.
Dalits, known formally as the Scheduled Castes and Tribes of India, number about 300 million. They have been treated as the lowest in the caste order and, not surprisingly, are among the poorest in the country. The new DICCI slogan marks a fundamental shift in dalit attitude to caste-based democracy, moving from the traditional demand for reservation in education and government jobs to cooperating with global capital. Political parties may have to rewrite their manifestos, right now so full of the tedious promises to protect dalits with jobs and sops.
Dalit thinker and writer, Chandrabhan Prasad, declared at the convention that dalits “don’t need reservation to grow. Instead, they need ample business opportunities to prove their merit.” He called on the industry to support dalits on a “partnership model instead of a patronage model” to help them break free from the conventional commercial culture of India, which runs on caste lines. Prasad is one among leading dalit thinkers who believes in the West and in its ideas of city, democracy, capital and primacy of the English language.
Prasad has even designed a brand new deity, ‘Goddess of English’ (Angrezi Devi Maiyaa), for whom he is building a temple in Uttar Pradesh, in the face of furious opposition from conventional quarters. His two-foot bronze goddess, modelled on the Statue of Liberty, stands on a pedestal representing a computer, sports a hat, holds a pen in her right hand and the Constitution of India in her left. Prasad holds that in the next two decades, there will be no jobs in India for anyone who cannot speak English. “If we don’t do something now, the dalits will not be job worthy,” he says. The deity is a powerful defiance of the Indian scriptures in Sanskrit, a language traditionally prohibited for the dalits and a knowledge system denied to them for thousands of years. The dalits are determined that English will not be similarly denied to them.
But it is the dalit endorsement of capitalism itself that is startling. In an interview last year, DICCI Chairman Milind Kamble said: “Capitalism dismantles rural societies and feudalism. Capitalism dismantles traditions and traditional cultures. Capitalism produces urban societies, democracy and modernity. India’s caste system thrived and survived on agrarianism and traditional culture. Caste is losing its grip over dalits because India is industrialising, urbanising and modernising. Dalit capitalism will accelerate that process and will accord a human face to Indian capitalism. Caste and capital can’t coexist. One has to give way to the other.” The dalit thinkers are now letting go of the demand for reservation as a priority because “government jobs will always be limited, but enterprise is limitless”.
The city offers freedom because a dalit or any low-caste Indian has the best opportunity to lose the oppressive caste identity in it, where he or she can walk in the street without the rural 24-by-7 tags of a ‘barber’s son’ or a ‘butcher’s daughter’, in blessed anonymity, in jeans and T-shirts. Global capitalism offers dignity because the multinational employer imagines all Indians in one colour, even if it is of various tones. The language of global capitalism in India is English. And freedom is money. Like Kamble said, “Without economic independence, dalits can never gain social independence. Without economic equality, there can never be social equality. Without a strong capitalist class within dalits, dalit politicians can never become strong.” The dalits, like Indian Muslims, could then have the strongest case to shed regional identities and set the national agenda.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 19th, 2012.
COMMENTS (29)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Dee Cee:
"Those trying to wish away the existence of caste in modern India or its urban centers just need to go through the matrimonial pages of English dailies."
Expecting or mandating people to marry outside their clans, caste, race or class is not the measure of discrimination. For example, what is wrong if a white wants to marry another white or a black wants to marry a black? Are they racists if they don't marry outside their race, caste or creed? Is it really discriminaiton? We need to leave out personal preferences out of this discussion on discrimination.
Interracial marriages were very uncommon in the US only about fifty years ago. It is now becoming more common. Inter-caste marriages in India are becoming very common now-a-days. Such changes in personal behavior takes generations to change and can't be forced or mandated.
@Yuri Kondratyuk:
"I only averred that despite the oppressive slavery, India was able to produce intellectual giants."
While any form of discrimination of human beings is horrible, abhorrent and can't be justified in any manner, you are wrong to use the term "slavery". Slavery means treating of humans as material objects to be bought, sold, owned and treated like animals.
@sid:
"According to what i have read it started with Aryan invasion of India……..About 1500-1800 BC……..so about 4000 yrs……."
There is absolutely zero evidence of any "aryan invasion" into the subcontinent that far before BC. Sure, there might have been routine migration of people from the caucusus. The only invasion was by Afghans, Alexander, Arabs and Persians, the oldest being by Alexander.
The idea of an "aryan invasion" was a theory put forward by some British historians without any basis whatsoever. All evidence points to the indigenous development of Vedic culture along the banks of of the old dried up Saraswati river, most of it in present day Pakistan.
@1984: I certainly agree that any flaws in either design or implementation of the current reservation system should be reviewed and correced. The discussion on creamy layer however assumes that the only deprivation suffered due to caste was economic. I do not believe that is accurate. There are issues with social empowerment also that need to be taken into account.
@Dee Cee: "Secular & Liberal Indians say these things about their superstars (Yes, those superstars who are the reason why rest of the world knows what is bollywood) just because of religious differences"
I agree with you directionally but would like to go further. Any society that suboptimally utilizes the potential of 40-50% of its population based on caste identity and of the remainng 50% a further 50% (i.e. 25% of original) is underutilized due to their gender cannot compete toe to toe with societies where opportnity is not so firmly tied to the accident of birth. Thus, I do believe that increased opportnity for people who were hitherto denied that, benefits everyone (though I do recognise the transitional pain for 2-3 decades) and is not merely an act of compassion. The size of the pie is not fixed and it does grow bigger when everyone is able to contribute to it to their fullest potential rather than just a few.
Having made my stance clear on affirmative action (I support it - though if there are flaws in design those can be reviewed and corrected)., I would like to argue that though caste based identities may have existed for 3000 years, caste based exploitation was a much more recent phenomenon.
The goal as I stated earlier should not be to eliminate caste based identity (why throw out baby with bath water) but rather delink opportunity and self-esteem from a caste based identity.
What is needed for all poor people irrespective of cast, religion or creed is free good quality primary and secondary education. The current reservation system only serves the SC/ST creamy layers who have already succeeded in becoming wealthy. These people have the power in politics to keep the reservation system that only benefits their children and grandchildren generation after generation eventhough these creamy layers have become extremely wealth and well-educated.
The caste system has become irrelevant in India. It has evolved into a class syestem instead as in most wealthy and advanced countries. The politicians want to keep the caste divides alive to benefit their own creamy layers as an effective way to corner the vote bank.
It is time for India to switch to a truly secular system with emphasis on helping out only the poor and needy irrespective of caste, religion or creed.
First of all,the caste based reservation is a total good concept in design,but went wrong in implementation.. During 1950,the economical situation coincided with the castes,with the Brahmins being richest and Dalits being the poorest...So giving them incentive would help them grow up..
But the problem occurs when their sons and daughters who had the same level of education as the other caste students get reservations which was supposed to go to the poor sections of his society...
Currently,the creamy layer is eating up all the benefits,while the rest are poor..and they will remain because parties like Congress,Samajwadi Party,BSP,RJD,TMC,DMK want to woo the lower caste voters...
I believe reservations should be continued,but the "creamy layer" concept needs to be brought into effect to make sure that there is equality among citizens
@Dee Cee: "Those trying to wish away the existence of caste in modern India or its urban centers just need to go through the matrimonial pages of English dailies." I have been observing this section for more than 20 years and can safely say that you can see the change even there. Even two decades back you would have hardly found any advertisement saying caste no bar. But if you look at that section today (as a matter of fact even in several matrimonial sites) you will find the section under "caste no bar" category increasing with time which points to some development at the level of mental horizon of people. people are becoming more broad minded and progressive. Caste system is a vestigial system and at max it should remain just that a vestigial organ something like the human appendix that has lost all or most of its original function through the process of evolution, (caste system) but remains there to remind us the atrocities and exploitation we have committed in the name of socio-cultural norms and traditions!!!!
@Dee Cee: Wow! Just wow! stop flashing your left/liberal card for a second and reread my post.
I only averred that despite the oppressive slavery, India was able to produce intellectual giants. It's because, education has been made a compulsion on caste basis. I only argued that caste itself isn't the evil but discrimination is. You only need to look at the apparently "classless" Islamic societies and the violence they are soaked in. Besides, in a practical sense, what are the chances that a rich girl would fall in "love" with a daily wage laborer? That's discrimination right there for you. And it happens in every society. For example, it would be irrational to compare myself with Einstein, Gandhi, Mozart or Bradman. Though we are all as human as I am yet, they are all a class above me.
Do not blame caste for social evils. They existed and continue to exist in apparently "casteless" societies too. Hence your logic is erroneous. For me caste is irrelevant. Unfairness (whether caste based or otherwise) is what I am against.
P.S.: I am not from a so called "upper caste". I am just a rational human being who abhors prejudice.
finally a positive article from this writer.
@Yuri Kondratyuk: "One must also concede the fact that caste system helped India produce intellectual giants and Nobel laureates despite centuries of slavery. An anomaly with will never occur in any other society except the Hindu society." Wow, simply wow! Then the fact that most of these Nobel Laureates were educated and worked under the British or worked in the American universities should also convince you that India would be better off as a colony of the UK or the USA. The few Nobel Laureates are great, but how many did we kill off in the caste based oppression? Caste system brought in a chasm between the 'scripture-based knowledge' of the upper castes and the 'utility-based knowledge' of the lower castes, and as a result we were crippled in our technological innovations. Caste-based oppression has pushed a huge number of people away to other religions (most notably Islam) that treated them as human beings. Caste meant exclusion and the success of a few upper caste people doesn't justify the exclusion of numerous others. Even the few successful are woefully behind all countries with similar population and history simply because caste prohibited exploration (concept of kalapani killed Hindu trade, concept of untouchability didn't allow Indian doctors to explore human body and hence we do not have an Indian history in surgery apart from the random legends of Charaka) and India did not have any worthwhile contribution to the world for centuries. And the inherent injustice of the caste system cannot be wished away by pointing out some upper class success. That's exactly what Nazis recommended in their eugenics program. Wow again! Truly 'modern and democratic' Indians we are!
Discrimination is fundamental to nature and isn't exclusive to human beings. In fact it is the sense of discrimination that drives evolution and natural selection. Caste system was an attempt to make productive use of this fundamental instinct. One must concede the fact that caste system did help in preserving,propagating and furthering knowledge of the traditional skills. You only need to look at the fact that the famous Damascus steel had it's origins in India. And in that sense caste system provided economic security. Additionally, caste originally wasn't determined by birth but, rather by aptitude. One must also concede the fact that caste system helped India produce intellectual giants and Nobel laureates despite centuries of slavery. An anomaly with will never occur in any other society except the Hindu society. And the same narrow caste determined focus on knowledge helped India that knowledge and not Kalashnikovs or nukes that ensure power and prosperity.
Discrimination itself isn't at fault but, uneven application of standards, rules and principles is.
Dalit capitalism will accelerate that process and will accord a human face to Indian capitalism. Caste and capital can’t coexist. (Milind Kamble quoted by Author)
If Caste and Capitalism can't coexist why is DICCI Chairman providing the suffix "Dalit" to Capitalism? IMO: (1) Dalits may not have much interest in seeing an end of caste system except for eradication of "untouchability". Mere so-called equality is not a compensation. There is obviously a paradox here. The desire for upward social mobility & acceptance in to the rarefied atmosphere of the high castes runs concurrently & equally strongly with practical considerations such as Reservations in jobs where State & Central Govts & undertakings are the biggest employers. One wants to be high caste for social status & low caste for economic reasons. Dalits would prefer to make the system work both ways to their advantage for a change as is already happening. (2) Even if the high caste Hindus were to eschew their ways, many Dalits, especially the tradition bound ones, are not likely to give up their worldview. The very same suppression & discrimination that Dalits accuse their tormentors of is practiced by them on their own too. Dalit of low caste may not think twice about being mean to another Dalit of still lower caste & so on. Theirs is not a homogeneous group and socially they are a fragmented lot even if it may be politically expedient for purpose of collective bargaining to project themselves as one group. (3)Far more important is to rid the pernicious state of mind that derives satisfaction only if there is somebody on the social rung below one's own, to look down upon. Urbanisation is one way for curing that malady & the Author is correct in seeing some merit in capitalism. In the process, evils that "global capitalism" may create elsewhere is another matter.
Those trying to wish away the existence of caste in modern India or its urban centers just need to go through the matrimonial pages of English dailies. Just because urban centers do not have untouchability doesn't mean suddenly caste-based identification has gone away. Look at the heartburn caste-based reservation generates in students in metros, and the automatic assumption that Dalits are of inferior merit. We still cry about a "300 year old" colonial past that apparently destroyed our confidence, sapped our resources, and made us poorer. How about a 3000 year old system that has continuously denied a set of people ANY rights (the British at least educated us), practiced eugenics in a way that the Nazis would be proud of, and created a hegemonic discourse of caste superiority that American imperialism can only dream of? It is the greatness of the democratic structure of India that such systemic abuses are slowly being rectified, but to do away with reservation in the govt sector is to ignore the 3000-year old structure of oppression that made it difficult for Dalits to compete on equal footing. The psychological internalization of inferiority has gone away to a large extent because of the power of Dalit politics, and slowly their focus is turning to enterprise. This is a positive step and, as some comments mention, this is one of the steps for providing opportunities.Many of our ancestors (mine for sure), enjoyed the caste-based privileges. History is balancing that and we should accept the balancing act with grace and compassion.
@Nitish: My friend, I must ask you to re-examine your prejudices which prevent clear thought. DICCI is not asking for reservations, they are asking for pro-active partnership from existing firms to help Dalit entrepreneurs set up new businesses. These firms will then be able to create jobs for many youngsters like you. They do not see reservation as the best solution to break the shackles that inhibit upward mobility of SC/ STs in Indian society. You cannot 'reserve industry business for either upper or lower castes' as you indicate - but commerce has been the preserve of the dvija varnas because they have traditionally controlled much of the capital and knowledge required for wealth creation. It is this wall that needs to be broken for broad-based growth focused on meritocracy rather than caste and should be supported by even those who define themselves primarily by their caste - which is a declining number in urban India, as one of my friends above indicates. Caste cannot disappear (and I would argue that the rigid social structures in India to some extent prevented conversion through coercive taxation in the middle ages, contributing to the survival of our ancient culture), but can be made irrelevant to economic status, and should be.
Ive seen many stories documented of Dalits who have become incredibly successful business people. Great to see. All the best from the other side.
*
Dear Author, please donot confuse Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. They are two totally exclusive groups and have little in common. Only Scheduled Castes can be referred as Dalits. Definitely not Scheduled Tribes.
While both groups may be among the poorest, the Scheduled tribes NEVER came under the CASTE system. A significant portion of Scheduled Tribes ( 30% - 40%) are Christians of the North East States. Many Scheduled tribes donot follow any organised religion - many follow individual animistic Faiths - examples - tribes of Arunachal Pradesh. Many Scheduled tribes are Buddhists. Some of course follow Hinduism (eg, largest - Bodos of Assam, Meenas of Rajasthan) - but they NEVER followed the Caste system and neigther were they EVER referred to as DALITS.
Please correct.
Excellent! So can the DICCI now appeal to the government to stop unfair caste-based reservations and ask for equal chances?
It will surely go over………u hardy find caste in urban metros……..Give people time 4000yrs ill practice cannot be eliminated in few decades…….
FACT:caste is not more than 2000 years OLD maximum 2300-2500
_
@Raj: There are many forms of identity that one gains at birth - gender, religion, language, sexual orientation, nationality etc. Problem is not with the identity itself but if the identity becomes the basis of for limiting opportunity. In a more egalatrian society there should be no barriers to opportnity based on identity gained at birth (barring nationality). I hope that I live to see India transform to such a society in my lifetime. It is definitely headed in that direction but there is a ways to go.
To expect that people will treat everyone the same socially regardless of identity and socioeconomic status is a utopian dream. Even some forms of limitation of opportunity are inherent in the nation state way that the world is organized. People in Western Europe and USA have more opprotunity than most people born in India and Pakistan - simply because unhindered labour mobility is simply not a reality today. This is unlikely to change and all borders are unlikely to become porous - at least in my lifetime.
@Nandkishore: It will surely go over.........u hardy find caste in urban metros........Give people time 4000yrs ill practice cannot be eliminated in few decades.......
@sid: IT is not inherently the caste system that is a problem - for it defines the roles and responsibility of different functions e.g. teachers/white collar workers, traders/industrialists, rulers(the executive branch of government in current times) and blue collar workers .It is the lack of upward mobility by linking caste to birth that is a problem. If a butcher's son chooses to be a butcher and is known as a butcher - surely there is no harm. The problem arises if 1. a butcher's son is denied the opportunity to become a Doctor or an IAS officer 2. even if the butcher's son becomes a Doctor or an IAS office he continues to be addressed as butcher's son.
The lack of upward mobility was clearly a social corruption of what was listed in our books for example we know that Vaaliya did become Maharshi Valmiki. I think the laws in India today are actively addressing 1 through affirmative action. But people's mindsets related to no. 2 have to be changed over a period of time. Fortunately visible trends point in the right direction though quicker progress would definitely be better.
yes...India has taken steps for the upliftment of dalits.. Indians respect Scheduled Castes and Tribes.. The days of untouchability are history.. India is industrialising, urbanising and modernising.. yes..we have to continue our hard work.. we will overcome poverty..
Prakash - I am glad that you have brought this topic. The article is very positive and rightly gives a sense of direction without any useless cynicism. There is no denial of the Caste system that has plagued our societies for centuries, but I hope that day is not very far when there is a general consensus that people should be treated as people irrespective of his caste, religion, ethnicity, economic and social status. There is definitely a change initiated as depicted by your article where the new age leaders have started believing in right to education and equality rather than reservations and quotas.
Caste will never go away. Caste brings identity. What money will do is to bring financial equality. To choose your way of life.
First article written by u which is optimistic about India...........
Caste system was a mistake by our ancestors we have to eliminate it...............I hope to see India 20 yrs from now with no castes..........
this will be a victory we would have undone 4000yrs of discrimination in About 80-100 yrs........We are Hindus no caste please
i request the Dalits not to vote as per caste...........