Regional concerns: Khar fends off Afghan criticism on cross-border shelling

Foreign minister urges international community to investigate mass graves in Indian Kashmir.


Huma Imtiaz September 28, 2012
Regional concerns: Khar fends off Afghan criticism on cross-border shelling

NEW YORK:


Defending allegations of cross-border shelling by Pakistani forces, Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar has said that “if 200 people cross the [Pak-Afghan] border, and behead 17 soldiers and slaughter them, what do you expect Pakistan to do?”


Speaking to reporters after the OIC Contact Group meeting on Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) at the UN General Assembly, the foreign minister said that she raised the issue of cross-border infiltration and shelling with her Afghan counterpart, Zalmay Rassoul, in their meeting.

“I raised the concern with him that if you give a statement on Pakistan at another forum — ideally, we should not be doing that.”

Khar stated that Pakistan does not resort to any kind of shelling without reason. “This is as distasteful for us as it is for you, but this is in reaction to something that happens,” she said. “We need to go to the root cause of this problem”.

Khar emphasised the need to work on border control and added that Pakistan should not be laden with everyone’s responsibility. “We will take responsibility from our side; they should take responsibility from their side.”

Mass graves

Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Khar and All Parties Hurriyat Conference (APHC) leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq urged the international community to investigate the mass graves in Indian Kashmir.

Khar, Farooq and AJK President Sardar Yaqoob Khan participated in the OIC Contact Group on AJK, which was also attended by OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin hsano lu.

Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Khar said that the issue of mass graves was the biggest validation of Kashmir’s stance on human rights violations.

“The international community cannot turn away from this issue,” Khar asserted.

Farooq said it was regrettable that the OIC fact-finding mission had not been allowed to go to Kashmir. He added that the OIC should pressurise the government of India to allow the committee to visit Kashmir and investigate the facts.

Emphasising the need for implementing Confidence Building Measures (CBMs) on Kashmir, he urged leaders to repeal “black laws” in Indian Kashmir such as the Armed Forces Special Powers Act.

The APHC leader said that while Kashmir supported the dialogue between India and Pakistan, it will not move forward until Kashmir was made part of the progress.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 28th, 2012. 

COMMENTS (2)

Shak Quraishi | 12 years ago | Reply

“if 200 people cross the [Pak-Afghan] border, and behead 17 soldiers and slaughter them, what do you expect Pakistan to do?” Well the 200 men are Pashtuns (Afghan by Race and by tongue "Pashtu") and the 17 soldiers of Pakistan who are considered as occupiers of Pashtun land or (Afghan Land) have been dealt with the same way British were in their heydays ruling millions of Indians. Sorry Miss Khar you are too young to say such things besides 8% of Pakistan (CIA factbook) who are Pashtu speakers do no consider themselves "Pakistani". I was surprised when I watched the cricket match between Pakistan and Afghanistan is Middle East and noticed all of those Pashtuns from Pakistan were siding Afghanistan team, that's when I came to conclusion that what history said was true. Pashtuns are loyal to no-one but themselves and they cannot be divided that easily despite their own differences of tongue and tribes.

Ajay | 12 years ago | Reply

She said - "Khar emphasised the need to work on border control and added that Pakistan should not be laden with everyone’s responsibility. “We will take responsibility from our side; they should take responsibility from their side.”"

We in India know (and I am sure Afghanistan knows too) how Pakistan takes responsibility. They engineer everything and then claim innocence or helplessness.

Pakistanis lifestyle is they like a lot of drama, action, subterfuge, posturing, form, style and little else.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ